Hi Jake,
The first thing I did to our 'phantom boat' was to power it up a little as Carl suggested to 300 sqft of sail area. Then I increased the crew righting lever arm until the boat had the same 'total righting moment to sail area ratio' as the Tornado Sport. This rational leads to a boat that has a higher power/sail area to weight ratio than the TS and the same righting moment to sail area ratio as the TS. This leads to a boat that is faster than the TS.
My whole point was to show that this design thing is a difficult task and you can't just grab a few features and throw them together and have a faster boat guaranteed. You have to do Performance Analysis on paper before you fly off and build a boat that misses your goals.
Your analysis, Jake, gets your boat up to the same righting moment as the TS but it is a heavy boat so it will be slower in all conditions because it is down in power/sail area to weight ratio relative to the TS. Your boat has 264sqft of sail area according to a web site. To have the same righting moment to sail area ratio as the TS, your boat needs a total righting moment of 6415 ftlbs. This leads to 11ft wide rails or a 22ft wide boat with nobody on the trapeze. Get out on the wire and the boat is 28ft wide. It happens fast doesn't it and it is still slower than a Tornado Sport.
Keep this in mind: If the goal is to build a faster boat than some objective, the overall performance goal will only be met when the basic design parameters of the new design exceed the competition. Building a new design with equal performance design parameters to the competition will always fail to be successful. At best the new boat will be equal to the old boat and who wants to build a new product that is the same performance as an old product. For a new design to be faster than an old design, the new design must EXCEED the old design in every performance related design parameter.
Good Sailing,
Bill