| Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: Todd Berget]
#106095 05/07/07 03:29 PM 05/07/07 03:29 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 807 Hillsborough, NC USA Isotope235
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807 Hillsborough, NC USA | A shoal definitely is an obstruction to a boat that draws more than the shoal depth. Therefore, RRS 18 might apply, but you don't give enough information to tell. It sounds as if the two boats in question are on opposite tacks on a beat to windward, though. If so, then rule 18 does not apply. The port boat would be obligated to keep clear and apparently did not.
If the starboard boat immediately hailed "protest", flew a protest flag at the first opportunity, and filed a written protest that accurately identified the incident within the protest time limit, then his protest would be valid.
Regards, Eric | | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: Todd Berget]
#106097 05/08/07 08:41 AM 05/08/07 08:41 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | I don't see why the red boat couldn't duck starboard since the obstruction appears to be on their other side?
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: Jake]
#106098 05/08/07 07:10 PM 05/08/07 07:10 PM |
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 263 SC zander
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 263 SC | I'm with Jake, Port boat has to slow down or foot off to duck the starboard boat.
Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won't expect it back.
| | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: zander]
#106099 05/08/07 08:25 PM 05/08/07 08:25 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 744 Bob_Curry
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 744 | You can debate rules all you want but the reality in any rule situation is how it is presented in the "room" and how the situation is interpreted in there by the judges. The rest is all hogwash and blah-blah-blah. In other words, stay out of the room. For learning, sit in a protest hearing and witness first hand how the process works. Dave Dellenbach and Dick Rose also have some cool stuff to download. You can purchase a rule book(s) anywhere (hint).
Bob <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
"The election is over, the talking is done, Your party lost, my party won. So let us be friends, let arguments pass, I’ll hug my elephant, you kiss you’re a $$.” Liberalism = A brain eating amoeba & a failed political ideology of the 20th century!
| | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: Bob_Curry]
#106100 05/08/07 09:47 PM 05/08/07 09:47 PM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered | Bob:
Understanding the rules 2006-2008 or someting like that by Dave Perry is best rules book I have found. Pics hekp explain things.
Doug | | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: ]
#106101 05/08/07 10:03 PM 05/08/07 10:03 PM |
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 471 NC drbinkle
addict
|
addict
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 471 NC | I agree with Doug. I have never understood rules as well as when I was sitting on the Victory Challenge team's chase boat listening to Dave Perry explain an America's Cup start sequence to me. His books are definitely a must read for every sailor.
Last edited by dbncsu; 05/08/07 10:03 PM.
| | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: drbinkle]
#106102 05/08/07 11:10 PM 05/08/07 11:10 PM |
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 951 Brisbane, Queensland, Australi... ncik
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 951 Brisbane, Queensland, Australi... | The FREE ISAF Case Book is as good as anything have to pay for. Pictures are included and it is official! Walk into a protest with a case book extract and you will instantly have the protest commitees attention. And it's free... Did I mention it is free? ISAF Case BookThe only thing I like about some of the books is when they give you the little boat shapes, very handy for playing out scenarios and debating with other ppl over a rum-bo. I don't think there's any that provide cat boat shapes though. | | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: ncik]
#106103 05/08/07 11:24 PM 05/08/07 11:24 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... hobie1616
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... | ...very handy for playing out scenarios and debating with other ppl over a rum-bo. That explains a lot. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> I don't think there's any that provide cat boat shapes though. Glue two monos together. US Sail Level 2 Instructor US Sail Level 3 Coach | | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: Bob_Curry]
#106107 05/09/07 08:13 AM 05/09/07 08:13 AM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 807 Hillsborough, NC USA Isotope235
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807 Hillsborough, NC USA | You can debate rules all you want but the reality in any rule situation is how it is presented in the "room" and how the situation is interpreted in there by the judges. The rest is all hogwash and blah-blah-blah. In other words, stay out of the room. As a protest committee member, I have seen several protest hearings go the wrong way - simply because the protestee or protestor did not adequately present his case. If people do not present the facts accurately, then the outcome will be incorrect. Therefore it behooves us to understand the rules. That way we can: 1) fulfill our obligations on the course (not break any rules) and exonerate ourselves if necessary, 2) assert our rights on the course (for tactical advantage), and 3) present a good case in the protest hearing if need be. Discussing hypothetical scenerios is a useful learning tool. Regards, Eric | | | Re: Another Rules Question
[Re: Todd Berget]
#106108 05/09/07 08:29 AM 05/09/07 08:29 AM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 807 Hillsborough, NC USA Isotope235
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807 Hillsborough, NC USA | You are correct, both boats were on a beat (the shoal ran parallel to the port layline). The shoal was shallower than what the Red boat's draft requirements so it was a continuing obstruction (rule 18 does apply). Red had two avenue's available to them to avoid the blue boat - Duck them or slow down. They could not tack due to the water depth. Since they could not tack because of an obstruction, does that mean that rule 14 does not apply? First of all, race committee should be flogged for setting a course with an obstruction on the layline. That said, RRS 18.5 "Passing a Continuing Obstruction" does not apply for 2 reasons: 1) RRS 18.5 reads "While boats are passing a continuing obstruction...". Note the plural "boats". Only one boat is passing a continuing obstruction here -- the other is not. More importantly: 2) RRS 18.1 states "Rule 18... does not apply...while the boats are on opposite tacks... on a beat to windward", so 18.5 does not come into play at all. RRS 10 "On Opposite Tacks" and RRS 14 "Avoiding Contact" both apply. The port tack boat (red) was obligated to keep clear under RRS 10, and to avoid contact under RRS 14. In this scenerio, blue had to take avoiding action (tack). Therefore, red did not keep clear. The starboard tack boat (blue) was obligated to avoid contact under RRS 14. Blue fulfilled that obligation by taking avoiding action (tacking). If this situation came to me in a valid protest, I would rule that red broke RRS 10 and disqualify her under RRS 64.1. Red could have: 1) slowed down and let blue cross, 2) ducked blue, or 3) exonerated herself under RRS 44.1 Regards, Eric | | |
|
0 registered members (),
353
guests, and 80
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,056 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |