| Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8 #134097 03/01/08 12:33 AM 03/01/08 12:33 AM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered | Does anyone know the actual displacement of both the lighter and heavier H-18's?
Does anyone know the actual dispacement of the early Nacra 5.8's?
I'd appreciate your thoughts or web links that you might have.
Thanks
Mike | | | Re: Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8
[Re: ]
#134098 03/01/08 12:42 AM 03/01/08 12:42 AM |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 531 Lake Murray SC FasterDamnit
addict
|
addict
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 531 Lake Murray SC | 5.8 was 160kg- 353lbs, factory spec
TheMightyHobie18 had a min class weight of 400lbs- but tended to be a little over that
Race cheap, race faster, Damnit!
E-Scow 24' ULDB
18HT hulls plus Gcat 5.7 rig = 18GT!
| | | Re: Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8
[Re: FasterDamnit]
#134099 03/01/08 10:56 AM 03/01/08 10:56 AM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered | I also posted this question of the Hobiecat.com forum.
In case anyone is reading this wanting an answer to this question, here was the response that I liked the best.
"My 1982 weighed in @ 435#at the 2001 Nationals, My 1988 weighed in @ 411# at the 2003 Nationals If your only concern is with the weight of the boat as you are moving it around on the beach, take the Daggerboards off when you are moving it, and there's your difference."
"At the Clear Lake nationals, the Heaviest Hobie 18 in the event was one that had been badly damaged and poorly repaired, it weighed about 465# and his two best finishes were in the lightest air races. If you let the actual weight of the boat get into your head, you are only messing with yourself. I lose way more in one bad tack than I ever give up because of a boat that is a few pounds heavy."
I believe this answered my questioned with factual details and set me at ease. If anyone has the same question, perhpas this will help. | | | Re: Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8
[Re: ]
#134100 03/01/08 08:36 PM 03/01/08 08:36 PM |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 757 japan erice
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 757 japan | for cat. numbers like weights etc. it is best to download something like the full texel ratings spreadsheet with all of the various boat measurements
eric e 1982 nacra 5.2 - 2158 2009 weta tri - 294
| | | Re: Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8
[Re: Keith]
#134102 03/02/08 09:20 PM 03/02/08 09:20 PM |
Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 216 Lakewood, Colorado MUST429
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216 Lakewood, Colorado | Look at how they float???? Whoaaaaaa .... Hold on there, that's not a totally fair comparison! I'll grant you some truth in that comparison, but there is a huge difference in the weight placement on the two Nacra's vs where the two fella's (Team Beefcake)are sitting on the Hobie. I'll grant you that the Nacra's ride differently, and are a bit more "sporty" in the way they feel, but the difference is not "all that". If you REALLY want to compare the difference, take a look at the PHRF ratings. Just my opinion, and in the interest of fairness and full disclosure, I am a die hard H-18 owner.
Stephen H-18
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass... It's about learning to dance in the rain
| | | Re: Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8
[Re: Dlennard]
#134104 03/02/08 10:51 PM 03/02/08 10:51 PM |
Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 216 Lakewood, Colorado MUST429
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216 Lakewood, Colorado | Dave, I should have added a Question Mark after the (Team Beefcake) comment. If you look at the two Nacra's, both the skippers and crews are up at the front crossbars, while both skipper and crew on the 18 are much closer to the rear crossbar. Weight placement is a lot of how the boats present themselves in that picture. And, as you noted the H-18 does have the extra wing weight hanging behind the usual center of weight.
A little research on comparing the Portsmouth Ratings after my comment in my prior posting
DPN for the Hobie 18 & Hobie 18 Magnum is 71.4 DPN for a Nacra 5.8 is between 66.4 and 66.6 depending on whether it is classified as a NA or an Original.
Hmm, I would not have thought the difference was quite that much
Just as a comparison, the Hobie 20 rates a DPN Number of 65, while a Tiger rates a 62.4, as does the Nacra F-18
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass... It's about learning to dance in the rain
| | | Re: Displacement of a Hobie 18 and Nacra 5.8
[Re: MUST429]
#134105 03/03/08 12:01 AM 03/03/08 12:01 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD Keith
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD | Granted, the weight is not trimmed great on the 18 in that pic, however the 18 crew is certainly not team beef. The 5.8 crew is not at the crossbeam either. The 5.5 crew is though, and it is interesting to note the difference between the 5.5 and the 5.8. Here's a pic of that 18 in better weight trim. Still looks a little low... Here's another 18. This one happens to be mine. I took the wings off for racing, I'm the beef, the crew not so much. By the way - you really notice the difference when you try to get back on a 5.8 or 6.0 after a capsize.. And yes, I'm well aware of the PN number differences - lots of things contribute to that. But the truth is as stated before, the 18 has less freeboard and less bouyancy than the 5.8. | | |
|
0 registered members (),
681
guests, and 111
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,056 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |