| Re: "hull year"
[Re: sail7seas]
#41418 12/24/04 10:47 PM 12/24/04 10:47 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 390 samevans
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390 | Chris, The story about Hobie hull "year" versus the actual year a hull was constructed has been discussed here before. Supposedly H-Corp. builds large numbers of hulls at a time without serial numbers (look at the hand etched serial numbers on hulls). As they construct boats, they put the current year serial numbers on the hulls. Hulls built by one group of incompetants could be used for several years production. If a company found a group of its products to be defective, they could stop using that product run for production boats, and use the remaining stock as replacements. Of course that would be rude and tacky (possibly illegal?) and we all know that the GREAT AND BENEFICENT HOBIE CORP would never do that to their loyal customers | | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: flumpmaster]
#41420 12/27/04 04:32 PM 12/27/04 04:32 PM |
Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 101 chesapeake bay davidn OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 101 chesapeake bay | What it lacks is a class legal spinnaker. Once you are used to running a spinnaker downwind on a beach cat I think you are spoiled for life. No matter what the attraction of one design (or formula) racing on non-spinnaker boats, I think the adrenaline trip of running a spin out weighs this. Now that's what I suspected! The Hobie 20 is a great, non-spin boat, but to attract new owners, I think it must have a spinnaker these days. You make an interesting point about running an extra set of wires from the top of the mast to support it. Also, is the Tornado spin about the same size as the I20/N20 spin (I think about 270 sq. ft.)? David H20 | | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: majsteve]
#41425 12/27/04 09:07 PM 12/27/04 09:07 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD Mark Schneider
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD | Hi David
It sounds like you would like find a consensus among the Hobie 20 racers for some kind of "unoffical class" approved spinaker rig... much like the New England 6.0 nacra group did. The goal of course is to get a level playing field on the race course while providing an unofficial and unsanctioned upgrade path that any H20 sailor could join in and support. If the Texas 20's, who are pre disposed to this kind of tinkering, have landed on a Tornado chute for the boat... you might have the begining of a consensus.
One thing to keep in mind. Texel and ISAF rate spinakers by size relative to the length of the boat and the Tornado chute at 25 sq meter for a 20 foot boat is considered oversized and docked another percent (in Texel ratings at least.) USPN does not regulate spinaker size with respect to rating adjustment (although Darline has long thought that such a thing should be regulated)
Take Care Mark
crac.sailregattas.com
| | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: flounder]
#41426 12/29/04 11:30 PM 12/29/04 11:30 PM |
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 248 Colorado SteveT
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 248 Colorado | 1. Make the boat lighter weight. It is not an easy boat to lug around a beach with two people. 2. Automate some of the adjustments. Waves, H16s and Getaways are popular because they are simple. There are a lot of lines on an H20 and adding a Spin. isn't going to make it more popular. 3. Wings. I don't know if the "Euro-Wings" are avail. for the H20, but wings: A. are comfy & B. Help when in a good blow. 4. Price. The cheaper they can make it, the better. Oh, Man! I can't imagine that any of this would make the boat more popular. On the contrary, it would probably sink (pardon the pun) the class. The H-20 is a technical, difficult boat to sail well. It's that challenge that brings people to the fleet. Why else would someone move up from a H16 or TheMightyHobie18, or anything else, if the 20 was less technical and less challenging? 1. When considering lighter weight, consider durability. The boat is already built lighter per foot than the 18. 2.See above 3. My couch is comfy and sailing skill is much more usefull in a big blow. 4. I'll pay for quality. Don't change a thing. The boat is great the way it is. If you want to race one-design with a spinnaker, get a spin-designed boat. If you want to do distance races, modify a spinnaker for the 20, but any major class-sanctioned changes won't make the fleet more appealing.
Last edited by SteveT; 12/29/04 11:35 PM.
H-20 #896
| | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: SteveT]
#41427 12/30/04 11:32 AM 12/30/04 11:32 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 833 St. Louis, MO, Mike Hill
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 833 St. Louis, MO, | Good Post Steve!! I totally agree. I think the H20 class is great the way it is right now. I would hate to see a bunch of changes made to one of the best boats ever produced.
Mike Hill Tiger #1520
Mike Hill N20 #1005
| | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: Mike Hill]
#41428 12/30/04 04:53 PM 12/30/04 04:53 PM |
Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 101 chesapeake bay davidn OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 101 chesapeake bay | Mike, Not to be argumentative, but you used to own an H20 and now own a Tiger. Why did you switch? If it was because the class was dying out where you were sailing, how much larger is the Tiger class? In my area it is smaller than our extremely small H20 class. Was it for the spinnaker? Was it to get on an up and coming boat? SteveT says that is why and where he is going in 2006.
Your switching boats and Steve's anticipated switch seem to make my point that, even though the H20 is a wonderful boat and basically the only 20 footer racing without a spinnaker, those facts may not be enough to attract new skippers or even retain current skippers. I could just try to sell the H20 and go out and buy a Tiger, but I would like to stay with the 20 and would like to see the class flourish. Since I don't see any 2 person race boats being developed without spinnakers, that leads me to highly suspect a spinnaker may be needed to keep the boat current. If Hobie had a another 20 foot spin boat (like the I20) I would not see any reason for them to consider a change, in fact I would expect them to phase the Miracle 20 out. Since the above is not the case, I think there is a good argument to be made to consider updating the Hobie 20.
Since Matt says emphatically there are no changes going to be made to the H20, I would ask him what he sees in the future for a top-of-the-line 20 foot racing cat from Hobie. Is the Tiger going to be the top line boat? Is the Miracle going to be the top line boat? (It could; it more than matches the Tiger upwind and with a spin would outrun it downwind.)
David H20 | | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: davidn]
#41430 12/30/04 05:45 PM 12/30/04 05:45 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 833 St. Louis, MO, Mike Hill
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 833 St. Louis, MO, | I switched for a lot of reasons. I really loved racing the H20 and resisted changing. I also ran a chute on my H20 in some distance races which was fun. Since the H20 was not designed with a spinnaker in mind from the start it suffers from some helm issues under spinnaker.
I switched because I do like sailing with a spinnaker better. Also I saw the class moving to the F18 class Nationwide. I saw the Tiger as giving me lots of alternatives for racing around the country.
And contrary to what some others think in my opinion an H20 can not compete fairly against an I20 in a heads up race. An I20 is simply faster upwind by a good margin. An I20 has a 32 foot mast compared to a 30' 6" mast. It simply has a more powerful engine. I'm sure an I20 is also faster downwind but I don't have any personal experience to base that on.
Mike Hill Tiger #1520
Mike Hill N20 #1005
| | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: davidn]
#41431 12/30/04 06:10 PM 12/30/04 06:10 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA David Ingram
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA | Since Matt says emphatically there are no changes going to be made to the H20, I would ask him what he sees in the future for a top-of-the-line 20 foot racing cat from Hobie. Is the Tiger going to be the top line boat? Is the Miracle going to be the top line boat? (It could; it more than matches the Tiger upwind and with a spin would outrun it downwind.)
David H20
David I used to drive a H20 about 4 years ago, and I also wrote Matt asking him if Hobie would consider changing the sail plan to be more competitive with the N60 (the hot boat at the time). He gave me gave me exactly same answer he has given here. At the time I was a little put out by his response. Now in hindsight (many years later) I can appreciate Matt's position and his support of the class. I'll be the first one to admit I have an issue or two with Hobie and Mr. Miller, but I really do respect their position when it comes to preserving a one design class (still love on the Hobie edict though Matt). As you have also pointed out the H20 is one of the last 20’, sloop, non spin, and two up boats left. I’d be willing to bet a large portion of the folks sailing the H20 are rather one design centric and aren’t looking for the kind of changes to the boat you are proposing (otherwise they would have left by now). You have yourself a very nice niche, try to exploit it! Not every team wants to run a spin around the cans and as several people including you have stated you can always put a spin on the boat and have a competitive distance racer. Just because the H20 isn’t the bell of the ball anymore doesn’t mean she doesn’t have a lot of fans out there. The TheMightyHobie18 Magnum has made a respectable comeback in FL, and for a while the H14 was pretty hot. If for some reason Matt has a complete break down and allows the H20 to be modified as you propose, I’d bet a case of Mt. Gay the H20 will join the ranks of the P19MX and NE60/N60 inside a year. One more thing, if Matt had allowed the sail plan changes I wanted way back when I would have left anyway. I had/have a serious hard on for the N20. Dave
David Ingram F18 USA 242 http://www.solarwind.solar"Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda "Excuses are the tools of the weak and incompetent" - Two sista's I overheard in the hall "You don't have to be a brain surgeon to be a complete idiot, but it helps"
| | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: David Ingram]
#41432 12/30/04 09:31 PM 12/30/04 09:31 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD Keith
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD | Some ramblings...
The differences between the H20 and the P19 and NE 6.0 are that the P19 class was pretty much already dead when the MX rig showed up, and the NE 6.0 seems to be dying for just the reason folks would like to see Hobie update the 20 - it sounds like they're going to the I20 because it has a factory rig that includes the spin instead of having to cobble something together.
The 20 is still a viable boat in some areas, and even if you don't add the spin, some updates to the rest of it just may help keep things going and fresh. I always got the feeling with Hobie that once a boat is designed and built, that's it, no updates to the class. After awhile it feels like a joke.
So Hobie is left with no viable answer to the N20, and until they can find another boat to import, they won't. And by viable answer to the N20 I don't mean something that will necessarily run head to head with it, but something that will at least capture sailor's imaginations enough to stay with the Hobie. From a new boat perspective, I'd see little reason to buy one over a Tiger, except that at my weight and size I like a 20 foot boat, so it would be N20 for me if I wanted a spin.
At the point I sold my 20 I was contemplating adding a spinnaker, not because of any illusions of catching I20s, it was just because I really liked sailing with a spin. I was a bit hesitant regarding the hull strength, as my boat had previously had a repair to the infamous hull problem - it had been repaired with no problems showing anymore, but I didn't want to push it.
I liked the feeling of the 20, it's pretty and it's responsive and balanced and quick, but it wasn't up to the speed of a 6.0 with no spin, and the 6.0 holds crew weight better. The first time I powered through chop without slapping the crossbeams and tramp in the water I knew that even though I missed the 20 I was happy with the new boat. But, if the 20 had the speed potential near the 6.0 I probably would have stuck with it.
So maybe there's an idea for the 20 foot non-spin boats - try to get some parity among them through updates and sail heads up in a non-spin formula class as well as in one-design. I'd bet you could update the H20 with mods that could fold back into the class, and give it dual life, and breath some life into some dying classes.
I've always felt that with dying-class boats that there was an opportunity for an owner's group to form a non-factory class association and take the boats where the factory won't. This could happen - the NE 6.0 guys had something like that going, but it's now faltering. I think in the end, the basis of strength for these kinds of things would come from people willing to breath new life into older boats because they don't want to spend the cash for a new one, or are just big fans of the particular design. But it also relies on something else that is a big soap-box issue for me - you need enough sailors. Here I'll get off topic, sorry.
We're still in the game of moving sailors from one class to the next. In the end, one class thrives and another one dies. Maybe that's just the way it will be, some sailors are always going to move around, and why shouldn't they? But if we continue to bring new sailors into the sport, the variety might thrive and might indeed be the reason the new sailors come in.
So, new blood, new blood, new blood, new blood. With new sailors comes the critical mass to keep existing classes alive and keep new ones growing. David - spec out some changes to the 20, and pump it up not just among the existing sailors but to new blood - "here's a great bang for the buck alternative, find out if you like cat sailing without buying a new N20" kind of a thing.
In our area the A-Cats are the growing class, and with good reason. And some people have traded in their whatever boats to go there. But we've also gotten some mono converts, and we're always looking for the next batch of people to join the WRCRA to take the spots the A-Cats might leave behind.
Why am I saying this? Because the H20 is a nice boat and I think an upgrade would be great, but no upgrade is going to change an I20 sailor back. But it might make a great alternative to somebody who hasn't gone there yet, and that person might be the fresh blood - whether the upgrade is something Hobie offers or some other package of specs. The Hobie 20 is not unique here, I think the 18 could still be used in such a manner, but it would take some vision. And you'd have to remember that the target is new blood.
As a relatively new 6.0 sailor, I have to admit I'm disappointed that the NE scene doesn't seem to be working out, it's something I would have moved my boat towards. But we've got three 6.0s in our club, who knows, maybe the Chesapeake 6.0 spec is next...
Ramble mode off, Happy New Years to all! | | | Re: Hobie 20 mods
[Re: Keith]
#41435 12/31/04 12:39 AM 12/31/04 12:39 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,911 South Florida & the Keys arbo06
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,911 South Florida & the Keys | The H20 is a nice boat. The Fox is a nice boat too but not nice enough to bait the H20 guys into making a fresh investment. Although I am a "B Fleet" sailor, there have been many times that I have hung in there with the rock stars until I made a fatal error, always my fault, not the boats'.
Eric Arbogast ARC 2101 Miami Yacht Club | | |
|
0 registered members (),
300
guests, and 36
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |