Announcements
New Discussions
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Robi] #81365
08/01/06 06:51 AM
08/01/06 06:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Timbo Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Timbo  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Robi, the damage could have been done weeks or months ago, it just finally let go now. Did you ever have a crew hang on it, even for just a moment?


Blade F16
#777
--Advertisement--
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Timbo] #81366
08/01/06 10:13 AM
08/01/06 10:13 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,718
St Petersburg FL
Robi Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
Robi  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,718
St Petersburg FL
I agree that the damage has been or occurred weeks or months ago.

Why I agree with that statement?

Becuase I barely made any pressure on the pole, and it just snapped.
I am thankfull, that it did break on the beach and not out while sailing. The carnage could have been worst.

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Berny] #81367
08/01/06 01:30 PM
08/01/06 01:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe


Quote

... That rivet has made the pole weak in at that point. ...



Really guys, that is is non-sense.

I hardly never refer to my myself as a fully schooled mechanical engineer, but I am. And that rivet and hole did not make weaken the pole by any significant amount. That pole is under normal sailing circumstances under compression, in that situation it is practicall impossile to snap it as is show in the pictures.

The break surface is smooth without any deformantion that would occur when it snapped under compression. This pole snapped under tension, which can only mean that the (initial) damage was fully caused by a loading situation unrelated to sailing or the spinnaker. Additionally crack growth can not happen under compression as the crack itself is closed by the compressional forces. If robi broke this pole with only a very small amount of force then a small crack must have been have present already AND the pole was broken in a way you tear a piece of paper. It is very hard to pull part apart when it is loaded in its plane, but by tearing it (skewed loads) it is alot more easier. This directly points to a misloading of the pole as again spi forces while sailing will never lead to unskewed forces. Most likely Robi could have sailed with this pole and have it survive even with the prior damage being there. The spi pole design is actually very well made from the spi loads point of view. Especially with the stabilizing lines from the bridle chainplates to the strut.

This pole was certainly broken (or initial damaged) by a force that was put on it outside of the upper vertical plane. Either a downward force or a horizontal force with a downward component.

The rivet hole, errornously refered to as weakening the pole, is of no consequence under spi loads as the compression forces in the pole do not allow a crack to develop around this hole. Therefor the hole is perfectly acceptable for sailing. Even when it is fitted under prebend. Metal fatique is not an issue either again because of the compression loads and the the fact that there are only very small fluctuations in the loading while sailing. Both of these work again crack growth with the last even delaying crack initiation to many many many fluctuations, properly in the order of 100.000's or millions of them. These will very easily make up 10 or more years of hard use.

The rivet hole is also insignificant because under spi loads the pole is not under bending at all. The tip support lines transform all possible bending into compression loads. Ergo the material around the full circumference of the pole is under loading and not just predominantly the part on the top and bottom as would be the case in bending. The crosssectional area of the whole is ONLY 5 % of the total crossectional area of the ring of material. This is downright negligiable.

However this whole situation changes when the pole is not loaded by the spi, but by a unrelated to sailing force that has a downward component when the spi pole tip is unsupported in that direction by tying the two halyards to eachother and tensioning them up. The support wires will now hang slack and all the load on the pole, with a very significant leverage, must be taking up by bending. It will be as if the pole it just stuck into a wall with 2 mtr sticking up and somebody is pushing down on its end. It will bend downward to same degree, as far as its elasticity will allow, and then bend permanently or break. Many of us use this principle when breaking and dividing a bar of chocolat on the corner of a table or bending waterpipes or steel garden wires.

I can assure everybody that a pole supported by a nacra ring will bend and break just as easily in this situation. So don't blame the rivet hole, it is really not the culprit

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Wouter] #81368
08/01/06 03:21 PM
08/01/06 03:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
I think Robi said he used the pole to lever the boat around when it's on the beach. So do I. My first instinct is to gob something up with epoxy and ram it up the pole to the broken spot in hope of preventing the break. How about a piece of pvc?

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: fin.] #81369
08/01/06 03:45 PM
08/01/06 03:45 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,246
Orlando, FL
tback Offline
veteran
tback  Offline
veteran

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,246
Orlando, FL
Pete,

Ever look inside your pole (or boom for that matter)? I think you'll find rivet casings protruding that will prevent you from "stuffing" anything up there that will do any good -- unless you first remove the rivets and re-insert.

The spi' pole shouldn't be very expensive to repair by using the SS collar or even a good machine shop could likely weld it together (not sure of strength)...worst case the spi' pole isn't the most expensive thing you can break. Ask Robi.


USA 777
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: fin.] #81370
08/01/06 04:37 PM
08/01/06 04:37 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,037
Central California
ejpoulsen Offline
old hand
ejpoulsen  Offline
old hand

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,037
Central California
Guys,

You can LIFT the pole and wheel your boat around all day long. Just don't push the pole down--that's where it isn't adequately supported and will eventually break unless you change it out for a steel I-beam.


Eric Poulsen
A-class USA 203
Ultimate 20
Central California
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Wouter] #81371
08/01/06 05:54 PM
08/01/06 05:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 308
Reno NV
R
Rhino1302 Offline
enthusiast
Rhino1302  Offline
enthusiast
R

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 308
Reno NV
Looks like a fatigue failure to me.

If it failed due to a single overload, I'd expect the tube to cripple (buckle in) at the bottom. Imagine what would happen if you took a thin aluminim tube and bent it - the tube would squish and form a hinge, but you'd have a hard time tearing it. If you've got a cheap source of aluminum tube, you could do the experiment yourself.

If you're pole is pre-bent, it should be under tension at the top when you don't have the spin up. With the spin up the top goes into compression. That certainly would cause fatigue sooner or later depending on the magnitude of the stresses. Corrosion could exacerbate that as does a stress concentration point.

Once it has lost a lot of its strength due to fatigue, it'll be a lot more vulnerable to minor mishandling.

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: tback] #81372
08/01/06 06:20 PM
08/01/06 06:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
T, I did in fact look down the inside. Didn't see any insurmountable problems.

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: fin.] #81373
08/02/06 02:43 AM
08/02/06 02:43 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
Berny Offline
addict
Berny  Offline
addict

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
Quote


Quote

... That rivet has made the pole weak in at that point. ...



Really guys, that is non-sense.

I hardly never refer to my myself as a fully schooled mechanical engineer, but I am. And that rivet and hole did not make weaken the pole by any significant amount. That pole is under normal sailing circumstances under compression, ..............BLA BLA BLA........


What an absolute crock!!! In general Wouter, I believe you speak a lot of sense but this is not one of those occasions.

In contrast to you I'm not a certified mechanical engineer but I've been involved in mechanical engineering manufacture for most of my 65 years on the planet and I can state with absolute certainty that the most significant load on the pole is a bending moment. There is a compression loading but this in itself is not significant, but because the pole is not 'in column' while under that load there is a significant bending moment being applied. This is a result of the compression load and the pole being lifted at the middle while the outer end is being pulled/held down causing it to bend and the point at which the bend changes direction, the point of maximum load, is at that saddle. As a result the, while the lower wall of the tube is being compressed, the top is in tension (being stretched) and under these circumstances the rivet hole has a significant effect as it reduces the area of tube wall at that critical point significantly making it considerably weaker.
While I may not be able to back it up with calcs, it's not rocket science, just simple logic. The pole is in essence a simple lever, loaded at the outer end, effort at the saddle, fulcrum at the beam.
Bern

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Berny] #81374
08/02/06 03:56 AM
08/02/06 03:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Jalani Offline
veteran
Jalani  Offline
veteran

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
<img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Simple experience tells me that you have a point Berny.....


John Alani
___________
Stealth F16s GBR527 and GBR538
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: fin.] #81375
08/02/06 05:41 AM
08/02/06 05:41 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
T, I'm gonna put the tail end of my hotstick inside the tube. I'll keep you posted.

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Rhino1302] #81376
08/02/06 07:16 AM
08/02/06 07:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
Berny Offline
addict
Berny  Offline
addict

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
Quote
Looks like a fatigue failure to me.

If it failed due to a single overload, I'd expect the tube to cripple (buckle in) at the bottom. Imagine what would happen if you took a thin aluminim tube and bent it - the tube would squish and form a hinge, but you'd have a hard time tearing it.

Unless it had a weakend starting point such as a normal drill hole with a torn perimeter.

Quote
If you're pole is pre-bent, it should be under tension at the top when you don't have the spin up. With the spin up the top goes into compression.

There can only be a compression load if the rig has a solid connection between the pole and the bridle intersection.
In this case, the pole end will move up and down independantly which will cause it to fatigue at the intersection.

How many spi poles have prebend?

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Berny] #81377
08/02/06 08:20 AM
08/02/06 08:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Jalani Offline
veteran
Jalani  Offline
veteran

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
[Linked Image]

Note the pre-bent pole....

Attached Files
82320-polecopy.jpg (181 downloads)

John Alani
___________
Stealth F16s GBR527 and GBR538
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Berny] #81378
08/02/06 09:45 AM
08/02/06 09:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 443
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
bobcat Offline
addict
bobcat  Offline
addict

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 443
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
[quote
How many spi poles have prebend? [/quote]

The Blade, as can be seen in Robi's pic
[Linked Image]
uses a compression strut below the bridle to hang the pole on. The assembly manual spec's out 2" of pre-bend.

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Berny] #81379
08/02/06 10:30 AM
08/02/06 10:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 308
Reno NV
R
Rhino1302 Offline
enthusiast
Rhino1302  Offline
enthusiast
R

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 308
Reno NV
Quote
Unless it had a weakend starting point such as a normal drill hole with a torn perimeter.


I'd still expect a ductile failure, not a rupture, from a single overload even with an ugly drill hole.

Without pre-bend Wouter is correct. In that case there would be negligible tensile stress in the pole. The upward force applied by the spinn should be counteracted by the lines that extend from the bows to the point where the tack of the spin is attached to the pole. Because the pole extends in front of the bows, those lines also exert an inward, compression force on the pole. Resisting that compressive force is the pole's main purpose. Essentially the system is a truss. It would be a pure truss if you had a hinge in the pole at the bridle connection.

With pre-bend the pole is also a cantilever beam between the bridle and the spin tack. Fatigue damage accumulates every time you rig the boat, and when the spin is unloaded (every dowse, gybe etc.).

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Rhino1302] #81380
08/02/06 05:33 PM
08/02/06 05:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
Berny Offline
addict
Berny  Offline
addict

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
IMO, fatigue damage is occurring continuously while sailing because of the ongoing, varying intensity of the halyard load and the inability of the lines that extend from the bows to the tack point to resist that load completely due to the acute angles of attachment.

I don't understand the logic behind making the connection between the pole and the bridle, a solid strut. This only exacerbates the problem as I see it.

Last edited by Berny; 08/02/06 06:33 PM.
Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Rhino1302] #81381
08/02/06 06:03 PM
08/02/06 06:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
P
phill Offline

veteran
phill  Offline

veteran
P

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
Folks,

I think there is some other influence outside normal use to cause the failure.

On the prototype I have my saddle inside the pole as the finish is a bit cleaner once assembled. I always move my boat around with the wheels beneath the hull at the rear beam and the end of the pole as a handle.
I have also given the boat a bit of a hiding on the water with some pretty severe nose dives looking for its limits.
For a while the pole has had a bend in it where I hit in one capsize.
Take a look at the holes in my pole. They have not caused any poblem.

Regards,
Phill [Linked Image]

Attached Files
82371-DVC00917.JPG (163 downloads)
Last edited by phill; 08/02/06 06:05 PM.

I know that the voices in my head aint real,
but they have some pretty good ideas.
There is no such thing as a quick fix and I've never had free lunch!

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: phill] #81382
08/02/06 06:07 PM
08/02/06 06:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
P
phill Offline

veteran
phill  Offline

veteran
P

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
assembled [Linked Image]

Attached Files
Last edited by phill; 08/02/06 06:09 PM.

I know that the voices in my head aint real,
but they have some pretty good ideas.
There is no such thing as a quick fix and I've never had free lunch!

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: phill] #81383
08/02/06 06:36 PM
08/02/06 06:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
Berny Offline
addict
Berny  Offline
addict

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 461
Sydney Australia
I see the your secret Phill. It's the relationship between the ant and the crawdad. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Re: Went sailing this weekend [Re: Berny] #81384
08/03/06 02:25 AM
08/03/06 02:25 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe


You just have your certification revoked my dear Berny. Look more closely at the total setup of the pole including the bridle strut and mid pole support lines.

The pole is indeed under small bending stresses due to the small amount of prebend, but these are not significantly compared to the other loading.


Quote

This is a result of the compression load and the pole being lifted at the middle while the outer end is being pulled/held down causing it to bend and the point at which the bend changes direction, the point of maximum load, is at that saddle.



You are talking about a buckling failure mode here, HOWEVER the pole at the saddle is supported in all directions but the bridle strut, pole itself and the mid pole support wires. Ergo the compression forces put on the pole by the spinnaker are NOT taken up by the pole in bending but by compression loading in the bridle strut and tension loading in the midpole support wires.

The other poster said it right. The setup is essentially a truss setup with a slight prebend in the pole to force to remove any slack and force it to try to bend more against the bridle compression strut. 2 inches of prebend is really not allot of prebend (low stresses) on a pole of overall 3.50 mtr. length.

It is however not a cantilever suetup under spi load. It will be when the owner tries to handle the boat and pushes down on the pole. For that reason it is much more weak in that role, one for which the pole was never designed.

Quote

While I may not be able to back it up with calcs, it's not rocket science, just simple logic.



True to some extend but you are still wrong. Buckling failures and truss setups are not commonly understood not even by many engineers. Sorry.

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Damon Linkous, phill, Rolf_Nilsen 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 714 guests, and 83 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,404
Posts267,055
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1