Catsailor.com

GPS plots over 22 Kts

Posted By: scooby_simon

GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/05/04 04:50 PM

Chaps and Chapesses

Still having a debate on http://www.yachtsandyachting.com fastest dingy thread
does anyone have an GPS plots over 22 kts I can use to show how fast cats (or any other boats for that matter will actually go ?

Thanks

Simon
Posted By: MauganN20

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/05/04 09:29 PM

I had my gps tell me I was doing 23knots once, but I didn't have a computer cable to record it with.

I can go ahead and forge one up if that'd work. (I used to work for CBS but we'll keep that on the d/l mmk?)
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/05/04 09:49 PM

No. I want this 100% pukka.

I know the T is fastest, just got to prove it....
Posted By: macca

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/05/04 10:30 PM

Bout 8 years ago, so old rig T. We were shy reaching in Pittwater in 15kts of breeze and had a coach boat tailing us very close, He had this stunned look on his face the whole way accross the bay. when we stopped he told us we were sitting on 20 - 22kts all the way accross. And we thought we were just cruising!
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/05/04 10:56 PM

Quote
Bout 8 years ago, so old rig T. We were shy reaching in Pittwater in 15kts of breeze and had a coach boat tailing us very close, He had this stunned look on his face the whole way accross the bay. when we stopped he told us we were sitting on 20 - 22kts all the way accross. And we thought we were just cruising!


This is my whole point I am trying to get over to these people who will not believe how quick Cats are. Few years back I did a race in the UK which is basically 30 miles down wind and then 30 back again and (after an upwind start) we got the the end of the Downwind leg in 1 1/2 Hrs (gybing down wind) - so 20+ kts as-the-crow-flies, but no GPS.

ho-hum.....
Posted By: Will_R

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/05/04 11:55 PM

I have some off the CFR of 18mph..... upwind in 20-25

I'd have to check the downhill numbers.....
Posted By: Barry

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/06/04 12:40 AM

I am headed out this Sunday on a N20 with a good wind forcasted (upper teens). I plan on having the GPS onboard. I also have skilled crew. I may need some help with the ploting.
Posted By: Jamie Diamond

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/06/04 02:01 AM

Barry, It plots best if you set the GPS to do "bread crumbs" on a steady basis, like every 30 seconds or every minute.
Posted By: Wouter

I have .... but do skiffies have proof themselfs - 11/06/04 03:25 AM



I have a track showing 18 knots but do skiffies have proof themselfs ?

I can have a look where I have the 18 knot track but it is not spectacular as this was one of the first tries and it was the first time we sailed together so we were not a oiled machine or anything. More speed was in it.

Wouter
Posted By: hobiegary

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/06/04 06:01 AM

I do not have a gps track that has consistant speeds in excess of 22 knots. But I hope that this video might help you state your case.
Bacardi Blast

It's a big file. You might want to right click on it and go with "save target as."

GARY
Posted By: hobiegary

Spitfire footage - 11/06/04 06:24 AM

Here is a link to take you to my favorite catamaran video. It is large, so use your "save as" function.
Spitfire Promotional Video "Want one yet??"

This video, at times has a data box in the lower left corner of the screen. It has two values shown in it. The boat speed in knots is on the left, while the wind speed is on the right. At one point, the boat decelerates from 21.4 knots to nearly zero, in just about a second. 3.5 G-force is claimed.

Music is good in this video; two songs are used. Be sure to view both halves of the production. It is beautifully crafted.

An oh... these are only 16 footers, I think!!

And here is one very fast H16! Please, please right click and save only on this one! Please, right click and save. Right click and save

GARY
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Spitfire footage - 11/06/04 12:35 PM

seend the Spitfire Video, it's the Biz....

AS for the GPS, depending on make, set it to sample 1 second rate, you will then get a good plot that you can download ti excel tha twill look something like this :

[Linked Image]

In about 10kts of wind BTW
Posted By: Wouter

Re: Spitfire footage - 11/06/04 04:36 PM

Sadly this following makes the claims a little dubious :

>>At one point, the boat decelerates from 21.4 knots to nearly zero, in just about a second. 3.5 G-force is claimed

1 G = 10 M/s^2 means a decelleration from a velocity of 10 mtr a second down to 0 mtr a second.

21.4 knots = 10.997 = say 11 mtr/sec velocity therefor a decelleration occuring during a whole second would only constitute 1 G and not 3.5 G.

3.5 G however would stop the boat dead in its track within 11/35 seconds = 0.31 seconds. That is only twice the amount of what a human being needs to react to the the decelleration. It would stop the boat within distance x = 0.5 * decelleration * Time^2 = 0.5 * 35 * 0.31^2 = 1.68 mtrs or 5 feet 6 inches. from full speed to zero within 6 feet. That is quite a "wall" you are hitting. Shock forces of about 250 kg are pulling on each person sailing this craft during this manouvre and I see the skipper remain on the trampoline ?. The total force required to perform "hitting" this wall is (130+150+ some sailforce)*3.5 = at least 280 * 3.5 = 980 kg acting on the rounded and smoothed bows.

Anyone else find this a bit 'out there' ?

I have never seen a catamaran do a full stop from full speed within a boatlength, let alone within 6 feet.

Think of it, coming to a full stop within 6 feet would not even allow the water to hit the mainbeam from the moment the bows submerge OR when the decelleration is caused by the mainbeam, allow the beam spray or wake to pass the rearbeam.

One more thing

The kinetic energy inclosed in the crew trapezing would be sufficient to sling him upward in front of the mast (remaining upright) to 6 mtrs. Or level with the attachement point of the trapeze hounds.

What do you think ?

Wouter
Posted By: Wouter

Speed claims in vids. - 11/06/04 05:02 PM

In the tornado clip they say the best time sustained an average speed over the measured distance 12.53 sec of 27 miles = 12.07 m/sec average over 150 mtr. = 23.45 knots.

The Hobie 16 video claims 20 knots speed for the Hobie 16 on a reach.

The Spitfire video claims 27.2 knot max speed.

Personally I'm very skeptical of any speed claims over 20 knots and that includes the claims made by skiffies.

Personally I only trust averages over at least 5 seconds (preferably 10 seconds !). Shorter measurement spans are to susceptable to freak occurances of various causes. Not to mention momentary surfing of a wave or something.

While on the water it certainly feels like you're doing 100 at least but when you look at real measurements you are often disappointed. Breaking through 20 knots is quite a feature and you are often marginally in control. Any water that hits your feet will throw you of the boat at these speeds. Hobie 16's doing 20 knots or more. I want to see that and and see the GPS plot of two runs back and forth (currents !). Looking at the wake a Hobie makes in such conditions I doubt it. But that could be just me.

Here I have a Taipan 4.9 (165 kg on board = overweight, no spi, on a lake = no currents)) GPS plot in a good force 5 blow (20 knots). Geert and I were sailing the boat and were new to eachother never sailed together. Thing that surprised me was the fact that we achieved the same maximum speed on a 45 degree upwind beat + a downwind leg as we did on a flat reach. The wind was gusty and we were hanging on from time to time. Geert has only one functioning arm and our styles were conflicting here and there so it was a wild ride.

The cel width = 10 seconds. So each colom shows the averaged speed over 10 seconds. Therefor points 1, 8 and 14 show stretches were we averaged at least 28.5 km/u for 20 seconds = about 160 meters (about 15.5 knots). Our best average was 30 km/u = about 16.2 knots over 10 seconds = about 85 mtr.

When taking the light blue and red together at point 14 we have on average 26.7 km/u over 60 seconds = 450 mtr = almost official speed record distance and here was AVERAGED 26.7 km/u = about 14.5-15 knots in about 20-22 knot winds. It was gusty so min and max speeds may swing a little around this average but I don't think we ever came past 18 knots. All the mono's in this race where WAY behind.

[Linked Image]

This is the best I have. Other plots show speeds at less windspeeds (and therefor boatspeeds) and aren't of interest to you. The other times we or I went out in these strong winds we/I didn't bring a GPS unit.

Wouter



Attached picture 39981-Improved_plot_tracking.gif
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Speed claims in vids. - 11/06/04 06:12 PM

Wouter,

don't suppose you have the max of the red ones (28kmh is only 15kts+) ?
Posted By: Wouter

Re: Speed claims in vids. - 11/06/04 08:53 PM


>>don't suppose you have the max of the red ones (28kmh is only 15kts+) ?

We have lost the max speed readout as that was not logged. I remember it as being less than I expected it to be. Hence my comment that I don't think we ever passed 18 knots THAT DAY. This is not to say that the boat couldn't be sailed faster just that we didn't do it that day and that we don't have any GPS plots/tracks of others day where we may have sailed faster.

As a Dutch person I'm very experienced in cycling and 30 km/u on a bike requires some very serious paddling. The speed sensation you get from that makes it feel like you are going very fast. Same with boats.

In all honesty I have yet to find any convincing proof that cats sailed faster than 23.5 knots under sailpower alone ever. Claims of 20-25 knot are mostly anecdotal and rarely, if ever, substantiate by dependable data. Often these claims are so badly supported that effects like currents (easily some 3 knots) and momentarily surfing of a large and fast wave can not be ruled out. Actually the tornado claim of 23.5 knots(as calculated from the vid commentary) is the only claim above 20 knots that has some credit. ALL others involved phrasing like :"We went really fast and when I looked at my handheld/etc GPS it said "**" knots topspeed, WOW !". The 5 or 10 second average may well have been significantly slower but is never reported.

We all know how dependable momentary acquired maximums are. Afterall they are derivatives of a measured travelled path and so some significant errors may exist if things like waves and currents can be assumed to not have influenced the read out. Averaging the speeds of a period of time is the only way to acquire dependable measurements. 5 seconds is the minimum timeframe for that.

Yet many classes claim regular speeds of 30 knots or even more. Skiff sailor make even higher claims.

Havig said this I think we could have travelled a little faster during the race where I supplied to plot from but not enough to reach anything near 22 knots.

I proposed that we contact the skiff sailors and agree upon a universally applied format.

Something like.

-1- we all set our GPS cel widths (average times or sample times) to 10 seconds.
-2- we regard the acquired average speed of these sample times as a measure for top speeds even though peak speeds may be a little higher as the min speeds are a little slower.
-3- We agree that this cancels out most electronic, alorgarithmic and freak off set and errors except currents.
-4- We agree only to acquire test series on lakes without currents or by validating the speeds on a return leg (2 legs opposite to one another.) In locations with currents this means that we average the speed of both runs to get the final measurement
-5- We most supply a traveller path plot with each speed data. Like I did. So we can see on what course the record was set and wether current or something was present.

This will also allow relatively cheap GPS units to be used as the sample time of 10 sec will average out most of the errors than the cheaper units are linked with due to their cheaper components.

Over time we will achieve a good picture of the differences and who is fastest.

Wouter
Posted By: Tony_F18

Re: Speed claims in vids. - 11/06/04 11:13 PM

This cat will do 25+ knots, Mr Parlier says it will do 40Kts.
You dont need no GPS logs to see that this little cat realllyyy flies...
And yes, it IS a beachcat ;-))


http://www.parlier.org/hydraplaneur/images/images_evenements/139_ev12_010704parlier.jpg
http://www.parlier.org/hydraplaneur/images/images_evenements/170_ev13_230804parlier.jpg


Anyway, the fastest I've logged was 17kts in a gust going dead downwind with just the main. Although I am sure I've hit the 18-20+ mark more than once with the chute up. IMHO the times when you go fastest is when you forgot to take your GPS ;-)



/* Tony_FX1
The Netherlands */
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Speed claims in vids. - 11/06/04 11:23 PM

Nice piccies, but not quite what I am looking for.........
Posted By: Tornado_ALIVE

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/07/04 09:30 AM

1997 Bermuda World Tornado Championship, during an event called the Bacardi Blast sprint. A timed run between gates that were 500 feet apart.

The Record stands at 27 MPH or 23.5 knots average over the 500 foot course. Completed in 12.53 seconds.

You acn find some footage here on John Forbes web site http://www.acay.com.au/~gonzo/tornado.mpeg

This was the days of the old rig with no spinnaker.
Posted By: Steve_Kwiksilver

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/08/04 10:08 AM

"This was the days of the old rig with no spinnaker. "

Looking at that video clip, I believe that`s a GOOD thing !!
Wonder how long it would have taken them to get it upside-down with the new rig & spinnaker on that course - much less than 12.53 sec is my guess.
Love the end, where Mr. Forbes (I presume) is just hanging around in the rigging.

Cheers
Steve
Posted By: Wouter

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/08/04 01:58 PM


>>UK which is basically 30 miles down wind and then 30 back again and (after an upwind start) we got the the end of the Downwind leg in 1 1/2 Hrs (gybing down wind) - so 20+ kts as-the-crow-flies, but no GPS


Land miles or nautical miles ? Current ? How many gives where required ? Was the bottom mark perfectl downwind.

Land miles ? = average 17.4 knots
Current helping ? = deduct 1 to 2 knots => 15.4-16.4 knots
Bottom mark not prefectly downwind => more and more equate the 'as the crow flies" speed to real boat boat speed despite gibing downwind.

And this is why GPS readings are so important. Especially as the show what the current was by looking a drift right before the start.

Wouter
Posted By: grob

Re: GPS plots over 22 Kts - 11/08/04 02:10 PM

Simon,

On the Marstrom web site they caim that downwind the M20
Quote
will lift its bow knuckle clear of the water and semi plane up to a GPS verified 30 knots.


See
http://www.sailcenter.se/administration/Boats/M20/index.asp

and follow the about M20 link

Perhaps you need to contact the company about this to settle your argument.

I am sure there are many on this site that would like to see the proof of this

All the best

Gareth
Posted By: Seeker

Re: Speed claims in vids. - 11/08/04 02:22 PM

I know most of the discussion has centered around cats 20' and under but I thought this might be interesting to add. I copied and pasted this from the Aquarius Web Site (ARC Catamarans).

"In 1984 Bill [Roberts] started designing and developing the RC-27, a design which would set the standard for many boats well into the future. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s the RC-27 set numerous records in the US and Europe. In 1989 Bill, his son Eric, and Peter Zboyan set the record for the lowest elapsed time in the Miami Key Largo race at 1 hour 44 minutes for the 45 mile course, that is an average speed of 26 knots! "

If the average speed was 26 knots, can you imagine what maximum speeds they were hitting in short bursts? And this was on an actual open water race course ... not some 500 meters of dead flat water in a ditch or lee side of a sand bar. Must have been a wild ride!

Regards,
Bob
Posted By: catman

Re: Wouter, you should have known!! - 11/10/04 05:42 AM

Quote
I have never seen a catamaran do a full stop from full speed within a boatlength, let alone within 6 feet.


I have not only seen it, I've done it. It's called a pitchpole Wouter you should have known!
Posted By: Sycho15

Re: Wouter, you should have known!! - 11/10/04 10:35 PM

My G-Cat 5.7M pitchpoled well within a boat length. Once that front trampoline dug in, the bow turned submarine and the stern turned catapult. BOTH bows went in up to the mast beam and the boat hit a 75 degree verticle angle before laying over on its side.
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Wouter, you should have known!! - 05/12/05 11:17 PM

Just to bring this back up the radar, I know have a plot of me doing 22.7 mph ~ 18 kts last weekend without the kite up and I am hoping to be out tomorrow too. Anyone else ?
Posted By: Wouter

Re: Wouter, you should have known!! - 05/12/05 11:43 PM



I'm trying but weather overhere is not really helping. Either lightwinds or it is very strong and blowing from the North. It is bloody cold overhere. Only several degrees over freezing. We still have mild frost over night which is very strange for the Netherlands in this time of year. We are still wearing wintercoats. Has been like that for weeks. Water temp is just as low because the air temp was too low to warm it.

My best speed, with GPS on board, is still 16 knots. Was on a reach without a kite bank in 2003. Had one or two promising runs since then but GPS logger died. My logger has a very sensitive back light switch. When it is on than it drains to batteries in about an hour.

Can you publize your GPS plot Scoob ?

Wouter
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Wouter, you should have known!! - 05/13/05 12:23 AM

OK, I will have to withdraw my claim of 22.7 as the GPS plot only records the actual average over the same course(I could take a Digital picture of the GPS Screen I suppose...), however I can claim 20mph (17.38 kts) for 24 seconds :

Paste of the plot log (edited for clarity, I can post all 566 plot polint if anyone wants):

Quote
1 08/05/2005 10:56:53 123 ft 162 ft 00:00:11 10 mph 343° true N52 17.912 W0 18.980
2 08/05/2005 10:57:04 125 ft 305 ft 00:00:17 12 mph 345° true N52 17.938 W0 18.993
3 08/05/2005 10:57:21 119 ft 180 ft 00:00:07 18 mph 28° true N52 17.986 W0 19.013
4 08/05/2005 10:57:28 119 ft 408 ft 00:00:16 17 mph 41° true N52 18.012 W0 18.990
5 08/05/2005 10:57:44 125 ft 521 ft 00:00:19 19 mph 43° true N52 18.063 W0 18.919
6 08/05/2005 10:58:03 128 ft 28 ft 00:00:01 19 mph 39° true N52 18.126 W0 18.824
7 08/05/2005 10:58:04 128 ft 102 ft 00:00:04 17 mph 17° true N52 18.129 W0 18.819
8 08/05/2005 10:58:08 128 ft 175 ft 00:00:08 15 mph 347° true N52 18.145 W0 18.811
9 08/05/2005 10:58:16 127 ft 80 ft 00:00:05 11 mph 336° true N52 18.173 W0 18.822
10 08/05/2005 10:58:21 125 ft 161 ft 00:00:11 10.0 mph 210° true N52 18.185 W0 18.831
11 08/05/2005 10:58:32 128 ft 264 ft 00:00:11 16 mph 209° true N52 18.163 W0 18.852
12 08/05/2005 10:58:43 131 ft 456 ft 00:00:17 18 mph 198° true N52 18.125 W0 18.886
13 08/05/2005 10:59:00 134 ft 701 ft 00:00:24 20 mph 201° true N52 18.053 W0 18.923
14 08/05/2005 10:59:24 128 ft 467 ft 00:00:18 18 mph 210° true N52 17.945 W0 18.990
15 08/05/2005 10:59:42 127 ft 574 ft 00:00:22 18 mph 193° true N52 17.879 W0 19.054
16 08/05/2005 11:00:04 127 ft 368 ft 00:00:13 19 mph 177° true N52 17.787 W0 19.089
17 08/05/2005 11:00:17 128 ft 84 ft 00:00:03 19 mph 190° true N52 17.727 W0 19.083
18 08/05/2005 11:00:20 128 ft 54 ft 00:00:02 19 mph 205° true N52 17.713 W0 19.087
19 08/05/2005 11:00:22 127 ft 216 ft 00:00:09 16 mph 222° true N52 17.705 W0 19.093
20 08/05/2005 11:00:31 125 ft N52 17.679 W0 19.132


Image from my PC attached :
[Linked Image]




Attached picture 49385-Pic for 20mph.jpg
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Wouter, you should have known!! - 05/13/05 12:26 AM

Night all. Off to bed after spending the last 36 hours re-boulding (well trying to) my Hard disk on my PC.

See you in the later morning, it's 01:11 here and I am sleepy !
Posted By: Wouter

Personally - 05/13/05 09:00 AM


Personally I think momentary (display) speeds on a GPS are highly undependable. The minimum average time should be 10 seconds. I think your 24 seconds is small enough to get a good average speed reading. 17.38 knot (European Inter-17 singlehanded no spi) is the current top score.

What were the winds and sea conditions, on what course did you achieve the top speed (reach, broad reach?)

Thanks,

Wouter
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Personally - 05/13/05 10:05 AM

Overpowered tight(ish) reach, Kite down. As you can see from the short plot, headings were not constant for long as it was gusty and shifty F5-7. Sea state was "Grafham chop" at about a foot or so - Short square waves that eat you if you are not carefull. Off out for a sail soon, so I'll see what I can do. Agree that 10 seconds is a good basis for "Agreed speed" for any want of a better word.
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Personally - 05/13/05 01:19 PM

Got to the club just as a squal went thru. Talked to the coxwain who said "it's been like this all day".

While I was with him it was registering a steady 30kts, with gusts up to 35.

No yotting as it was onshore and not easy to launch and recover. Try again next week.

Think the 300 oppies will have fun this weekend as it's not scheduled to drop much all weekend
Posted By: cyberspeed

2005 Steeplechase Day 1 - 05/13/05 01:59 PM

During the first day of the Steeplechase a couple of weeks ago we logged 23 mph on our gps. It was blowing over 20mph and we were at a beam reach in the bays double trapped on our SC-20 short rig. What a blast, we were screaming. There were boats in front of us so I am sure they were logging higher.

Once we got into the ocean it was way too choppy to create any good speed.
Posted By: grob

Re: Personally - 05/13/05 02:13 PM

Scooby,

I thought you were being a bit "optimistic" when I read you were going sailing this morning, I had booked the day off to go out on my new boat, took a walk down to the seashore to see what looked like perfect conditions, 10-15mph with a flat sea due to the NNE Wind. However when I got home and checked the shipping forecast a Gale warning F6-F8 sent me back to work to save the day off for a better day.

From my office window I can see I made the right choice.

Gareth
www.fourhulls.com
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Personally - 05/13/05 02:31 PM

Yes it was windy, but totally sailable If I could have (sensibly) got out and back - Had the kite up in the same sort of winds on sunday but it was along the lake so making launch and recovery much easier.

Problem was that it was just about dead onshote which makes it a little difficult managing the boat and the trolly on its/your own. It's then really difficult when you come in as I do not want to leave a boat to drift onto the beach while I get the trolly.
Posted By: grob

Re: Personally - 05/13/05 03:19 PM

Quote
I do not want to leave a boat to drift onto the beach while I get the trolly.


Why don't you just pull it up the beach and then go and get the trolley? are the hulls that fragile? What boat do you sail?
Posted By: Tony_F18

Personal best... - 05/13/05 05:48 PM

Last weekend (7/5/5) during the Round IJsselmeer race in The Netherlands I clocked a speed of 17.1kts (20mph/31kph). Wind conditions where NW F6-F7 with nasty short steep waves. My boat is a Hobie FX-One, during the topspeed I was sailing with just the mainsail with an AWA of +/-120°.

Topspeeds are always a bit doubtfull but exporting the GPS track to Excel showed I have 13 occurences of 16kts (without the spi), which accounts for a total of 180 meters or 00:01:07 minutes. So, if 16 knots is a "normal" speed I would say that the 17 knot topspeed is very real. I'm convinced if I wasnt sailing in survival mode ;-) 20kts+ is possible.

Anyway, an hour later after I pitchpoled, poked some battens through the main, and blew the spi panels apart (Yes the glue let go!) I abandoned the race. When I came ashore someone measured 30kts+ of wind, only 17 out of 65 cats made it to the finish. Texel is easy compared to this ;-)
(ps.Wouter, will you be there next year? ;-) )

Complete GPS track available upon request...
(Garmin's Foretrex 201 rocks!)

Attached picture 49434-PersonalBest.jpg
Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Personally - 05/13/05 08:02 PM

Quote
Quote
I do not want to leave a boat to drift onto the beach while I get the trolly.


Why don't you just pull it up the beach and then go and get the trolley? are the hulls that fragile? What boat do you sail?


Inter 17. The beach is mud / stone so really do not want to dit this.
Posted By: Wouter

Well I got out ... - 05/13/05 10:49 PM


Well I got out today (this evening) about 300 km to the east of you and boy it was "hanging on" weather. I was hoping for flat water because of the eaterly winds we had the last days but is just swing N to NW this afternoon and it had quickly build up a seastate that had us going up and done like climbing Everest.

Good fun though. Water is still bloody cold though. We;ve had day temperature below 10 degrees Celsius for the last 3 weeks. Normal temp would be 16 to 17 degrees celsius. On average we are about 8 to 10 degree to low for the time of year. it is pretty strange to fire up the heater and dig your winter coat up from the closet in halve may.

No GPS recording today, I was taking my new crew out and I already had enough to worry about. So I left my GPS on the shore. With the seastate I don't think I would have broken my own record anyway. It was way to rough for that

Wouter
Posted By: Wouter

Top speed or 10 second average ? - 05/13/05 10:57 PM


Quote

of weeks ago we logged 23 mph on our gps



Top speed or 10 second average ?

Rules to this "high score' game are simple. You need to provide a GPS track plot and track with your post and it must be AT LEAST a 10 second (averaged) leg. Momentary and GPS display top speeds don't count. These are just to undependable. Leave your GPS unit outdoors stationary and it will show speeds upward to 5 km/hour speeds due to measurement in consistancies.

Personally I value 500 mtr = 50 seconds averages the highest.

Wouter


Posted By: Wouter

Re: Personal best... - 05/13/05 11:18 PM



Tony,

Can you proces your track data so it averages the speeds over 10 second intervals (even 30 second intervals).

I think that 17.1 knots topspeed for the duration of 1 second and 29 ft = 8.8 mtr is a bit short. Natural inaccuracy looks like a likely cause for this reading especially since 1 sec before you were doing 14 kn and 1 second after you were doing 13 kn. I feel it is unlikely that you can both accelerate from 14 to 17 and decellerate from 17 to 13 in the time span of 1 second. When looking at the spread of data in the provide track log this 17.1 kn speed really looks like an suspective outlier. It looks like you average about 13.5 kn over roughly 500 mtr.

Ofcourse the name of this "high score" game is best average over at least 10 seconds.


Quote

Topspeeds are always a bit doubtfull but exporting the GPS track to Excel showed I have 13 occurences of 16kts (without the spi), which accounts for a total of 180 meters or 00:01:07 minutes.



180 mtr / 1 min 7 second = on average 2.686 mtr/sec = 5,2 knots. Either you've made a typo or these 13 occurences are highly suspect.


Quote

So, if 16 knots is a "normal" speed I would say that the 17 knot topspeed is very real.
I'm convinced if I wasnt sailing in survival mode ;-) 20kts+ is possible.



I fully agree that 16 to 17 knots is a speed that most catamarans must be able to achieve in the right conditions. The newer cats even rather easily. However 20+ kn has proven to be very illusive. At least when looking at either 500 mtr legs or 10 seconds sustained speed. Many feel that these 4 to 3 knots is only a small gap to bridge but reality is showing that this 17 % to 25 % speed increase is rather large.

Of course the problem several us are finding is the seastate (survival mode as you call it) For 20+ we really need windforce 5 or more with very flat water. This is actually a rare combination of conditions. I'm looking for a good summer day with a very calm morning and a good heavy thermal wind that quickly builds from the land after noon. Not too gusty. So probably one only has an hour or so when the winds pick up to make the record. After that the water gets choppy and the gusts come through big and heavy.


Quote

Anyway, an hour later after I pitchpoled, poked some battens through the main, and blew the spi panels apart (Yes the glue let go!) I abandoned the race.


I'm sorry to hear that !

[qoute]
(ps.Wouter, will you be there next year? ;-) )
[/quote]


Was looking to be there this year but I didn't want to do it solo. Just took my new crew out today. Little lady of 55 kg with a big heart and guts that is the envy of many guys. Was bloody windy today as you most likely know. If she stays than I'm considering doing this race next year.

Did you participate in the voorjaarsbokaal at Almeerderstrand this year Tony ? If so than I know who you are.


Quote

Complete GPS track available upon request...
(Garmin's Foretrex 201 rocks!)



Ain't that the truth !



Hey guys ? Any US or Aussie sailors in for a "best GPS average over 10 seconds" high score game ?

Wouter

Posted By: scooby_simon

Re: Personal best... - 05/14/05 01:43 PM

OK, I'm thinking of introducing this "self policed" speed contest over on the Y+Y forum so the 1/2 boat sailors can get involved, but can anyone think of any more rules to add over and above :

1, Must be a GPS plot posted showing:

Quote
13 08/05/2005 10:59:00 134 ft 701 ft 00:00:24 20 mph 201° true N52 18.053 W0 18.923

Plot no, date, time, Alt, distance, time on heading, speed heading and location (Northing/southing and easting/westing)

2, Graphic of the plot(s) in question.
3, To qualify the plot must be more than 10 seconds in duration

Basically as I have above.

Comments ?

© 2024 Catsailor.com Forums