Nope, the recorded finish was an hour longer than the actual time we took. We had a recorded time of 20:47:02 whereas I think it should have been 19:47:02 (by my own watch I had called it 19 hours and 47 minutes even, I'll give them the 2 extra seconds without much complaint ).



If the person recording times had a watch on that was set to Eastern time, it would make the elapsed time seem to be one hour longer than the correct elapsed time. Hypothetically, if we finished at 4 am central and started at 8am, we would have had an elapsed time of 20 hours. If the person recording the time was on eastern time, they would record 5am, therefore an elapsed time of 21 hours it would seem. Seeing as I don't have a clue who was recording the times (I didn't even see them on the dock), I wouldn't know if this was a possibilty or not.



I don't think it makes much difference either way, just wanted to make sure I wasn't going crazy.