[quote]
As such the FORMULA F16 class rules will have done their job. For it is not the responsibility of such class rules to prevent stupidity in its class members but to merely level the playing field and allow normal people with normal budgets to have a fair chance.
Wouter
There are no restrictions in any class as to what can be done within their current rule set. A lot of money can be spent to make the ultimately stiff F18 platform (and this is possible within your rules). Carbon is cheap compared what it costs to develop, engineer, manufacture and a product. Judicious use of carbon to achieve what MAY be considered a better product is often a less expensive alternative than restricting yourself to older technology.
More small builders and individual/groups developing “uber” boats on the side can only help the class. This is free development and experimentation that if it works will make the class better. Small builder development of techniques and material use prove in systems that in time become the standard and all classes (should they choose) have the possibility of benefit. Shy of mounting an engine on one, races are still going to be won by the best sailor.
The few F18 and other guys who keep coming to this forum claiming this class is in chaos and doomed because we are not following their rule set, or placing ridiculous restrictions that do nothing, should look at their own classes. Costs keep coming back, if you really want to limit this; then kill all development. Pick your ride and go 1 design. Look at how many new models of boats are being designed, tooled and marketed to keep on top the leader board. Pro drivers being sponsored so their models sit on top. And probably one of the bigger items, sail and rig development. These are the things that are expensive and manufacturers WILL recover these costs if they stay in business.
