Originally Posted by Jalani
Andrew, F16 is a semi-development class. Wings can be retro-fitted (at a cost and adjustment to beam width) and should a carbon, folding wing setup be trialled and found to be leap forward in performance, it would then be up to each owner to decide whether they should go that route........
I (and other F16 owners) fail to see the struggle in that?


My bad... the wing rule serves no purpose, not sure why its even in there really.

However, I do like the "F16 is a semi-development class" part. If the class is open to development why are curved boards banned? it seems that there is a risk of falling behind the development curve...

was there a reason as to the banning of curved boards? almost anything else goes so why not the bent boards?


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com