Hello to all,

As the original poster, I thought it wise to give a brief follow up. First, contrary to some replies, the post was not to ruffle feathers, nor make a statement. It was simply to see how other Hobie fleets handled the A class cat. Somehow, the conversation drifted to X class and the acceptance or denial of such.

That topic leads me to the following. As a believer in the supply side market system, I understand that a financial “contract” exists on a voluntary basis. Both buyer and seller agree to such exchange, and both expect to be “better off”. Using this rationale, I sold my Inter 20 (rather sad day, as that is a great, great boat to sail), and I purchased an A cat.

The purchase, as stated was in a group sale, so that I (we) would have an ‘instant fleet’ out of the box. Shortly thereafter, word got out of the ‘mass’ purchase and the infamous letter (email) arrived. Voila! Instant topic for catsailor.

I am surprised at some of the remarks made, and even understand them somewhat. I can applaud and even appreciate loyalty to brands. However, understanding the S and D curve, and the above theory of voluntary exchange for goods and services, I must now consider the following.

Why would I want to buy a product that is not going to give me satisfactory results? Indeed, if 7-10 like boats show up at a race and are merely used to generate revenue, i.e.: not scored, awarded, and honored. I ask again, why would I want to participate? There are other options available that would be beneficial to both parties involved. Thus far, that is my mind set.

In all my web surfing, I have come across several Hobie fleets that recognize and award X boats. There are even Hobie fleets that have more than one X start! Hopefully, this attitude can prevail up here in the Northwest. If the powers that be think that ought not to happen, then all I can say is THANK YOU for all the past races, and good times and memories.

I suppose that is enough for now,

Michael (Interless! In Seattle, Waiting for A cat)