| Hobie Tiger weight #4716 12/13/01 08:06 PM 12/13/01 08:06 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Can someone tell me the the class weight (one design)
of the Hobie Tiger. A boat sailed in the USA at a Hobie Event.
Thanks Fritz | | | Re: Hobie Tiger weight
[Re: Tom Korz]
#4719 03/22/02 06:19 AM 03/22/02 06:19 AM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | 180kg * 3.281 = 590.58 Lbs
386 Lbs = 117.6Kg :Light Tiger (no mast and rigging maybe) | | | Re: Conversion factors
[Re: Eric Anderson]
#4721 03/22/02 11:26 AM 03/22/02 11:26 AM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Eric-
Very entertaining! The part about the beer, not the electrons!! Pull some strings this weekend!! DCS
| | | Re: Hobie Tiger weight #4722 04/01/02 11:22 PM 04/01/02 11:22 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | where can i go to get the NAF rules? crew weight, tiger weight, other rules, etc. i just bought a tiger and have only raced hobie regattas in the past. | | | Re: Hobie Tiger weight #4723 04/02/02 11:26 AM 04/02/02 11:26 AM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Congratulations with the new boat. You can find the website at http://www.naf18.com/.Bob O’Connor Tiger852@palm.net | | | Re: Hobie rules
[Re: samevans]
#4725 04/05/02 12:31 PM 04/05/02 12:31 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 46 Michigan, USA RCochran
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 46 Michigan, USA | Hi Sam,
I'm not clear on your post. If a Hobie Tiger meets the NAF-18 rules, what modification would be required?
Regards,
Roger
Nacra F17
USA 320
We Don't Need No Stinking Jib!
| | | Re: Hobie rules
[Re: RCochran]
#4726 04/05/02 02:17 PM 04/05/02 02:17 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 833 St. Louis, MO, Mike Hill
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 833 St. Louis, MO, | Hobie Tiger rules don't allow other manufacturers of sails. They also don't allow the self-tacking jib. I'm sure there are plenty of other rule differences but these are the biggies.
These features are allowed in NAF-18 and F18 racing.
Mike Hill
H20 #791
Mike Hill N20 #1005
| | | Even better is ...
[Re: samevans]
#4729 04/06/02 02:38 PM 04/06/02 02:38 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe |
Hobie Tiger is a one-design class but as soon as hobie decides to go with new spreaders, new squaretop, selftacking jib, new boom outhaul setup and other goodies; Hobie corp itself just changes the rules of the ONE-DESIGN class to allow these changes.
I say "ONE-DESIGN" is only a lip service with respect tp Tiger. So forget this "One-design" crap and go formula all the way.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Tiger is NAF18
[Re: samevans]
#4730 04/08/02 12:00 PM 04/08/02 12:00 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Sam,
What do you mean by your statement, "Many of us are using the new Harken Carbo...", did you get a Tiger? Is there something you aren't telling us?
Anyway, Harken Carbo blocks are not made of carbon fiber. Its just a fancy name for the new type of plastic composite that they mold the blocks out of. My Tiger came from the factory with some carbo blocks, so how could they be illegal? Its my understanding that Harken will be phasing out the old blocks anyway.
Dennis | | | Re: Even better is ...
[Re: Wouter]
#4731 04/08/02 12:17 PM 04/08/02 12:17 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Wouter,
How does updating equipment on a boat make it no longer one-design? If that is true, then how does the Tornado class consider itself "THE" one design catamaran? They have been updating the Tornado for over 30 years, yet they are still considered one design. Am I confused, or should the Tornado class be called Formula 20 with a hull shape and foil restriction? Because those are the only things about that one-design that haven't changed over the years.
Dennis | | | Re: Tiger is NAF18
[Re: samevans]
#4733 04/08/02 05:56 PM 04/08/02 05:56 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | http://harkenstore.com/uniface.urd/SCCYSPW1***From Harken Website We designed our 75 mm Carbo AirBlocks for speed. Made of high-strength engineering plastics, the single weighs in at a very light 6.9 oz (195 grams) - including the shackle. Doubles and triples aren't much more! The strength-to-weight ration on these blocks is extremely high. They are the first all-plastic blocks with a safe working load of 1,200 lbs. *** End Harken web site Note: the last sentence "First All-Plastic Blocks " I wonder why they would not want to advertise that there is carbon in them? In fact when I do a search for "carbon" on their web site, I only find reefing and furling systems for much bigger boats.... I don't understand? Sam, am I looking at the wrong blocks? Thanks Bob O Tiger 852 | | | Tornado is often considered a formula class in EU #4734 04/09/02 02:50 AM 04/09/02 02:50 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe |
The Tornado is often considered to be a Formula class in EU. For example multiple manufacturers can make tornado's and sell them for racing. However Marstrom competed all others out of business. The tornado class has very strickt formula rules and is strcikter than say F18 for it rules on hull shape too.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Carbon blocks
[Re: samevans]
#4736 04/09/02 12:18 PM 04/09/02 12:18 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Sam,
FYI for the future
Take Care
Bob
From Harekn Tech Support.
Bob,
It is a reference to the color not the element. The blocks are molded from
a long grain plastic of a proprietary material but they do not contain
carbon.
Jim Bourne technical service,
----- Original Message -----
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Carbo AirBlocks
> Hello,
>
> Do Carbo AirBlocks have carbon in their construction? My class rules
state
that I can not replace blocks with blocks made of Carbon.
>
> Thank you for your time.
> Bob O'Connor | | | Re: Tiger is NAF18
[Re: samevans]
#4737 04/09/02 04:19 PM 04/09/02 04:19 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 46 Michigan, USA RCochran
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 46 Michigan, USA | Thanks for the clarification.
Nacra F17
USA 320
We Don't Need No Stinking Jib!
| | | Re: catch 22 - carbon
[Re: RCochran]
#4738 04/09/02 05:30 PM 04/09/02 05:30 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 390 samevans
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390 | Actually, almost all plastics and rubbers that appear black, or other dark colors, contain Carbon black for UV stabilization.
The Harken catalog even states that their Big Bullet, Dinghy, 2.25" and 3.00" blocks have "Carbon-black filled balls" and "UV stabilized Delrin sheaves and cheeks".
Are these considered deadly "carbon blocks"?
The point I am trying to make is that some knucklehead at Hobie thinks up these arbitrary "rules" and has them approved without properly researching them through.
Here is the rule in question:
"6.6 Replacement blocks or fittings shall not be constructed of exotic materials such as carbon, titanium, etc."
In the first place, carbon is not so "exotic" anymore.
By using the term "Replacement", the onus is on the boat owner to prove that the blocks came on his boat.
What if they are not the original purchaser of the boat?
Now in reality, if every Tiger shows up with the same "carbo/carbon" blocks, then no one will protest, but the screwed up rule is still there.
I have done a lot of contract administration and I just don't like goofy rules.
HEY, a least the Tigers and Foxes are allowed to use an 8:1 mainsheet :-)
Most of us are stuck with a 7:1 or lower :-( | | | Re: Conversion factors
[Re: Eric Anderson]
#4739 05/29/02 09:07 PM 05/29/02 09:07 PM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 251 beaufort, sc dannyb9
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 251 beaufort, sc | ouch! europeans are far less cultured than whom? where did the tiger come from and why?
marsh hawk
| | | Re: Conversion factors
[Re: dannyb9]
#4740 05/29/02 10:15 PM 05/29/02 10:15 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | who cares? is there any racing going on? or just idle chat and politics? i am ready to switch to a monohull where i can actually go one design racing every week and talk about RACING, not read two pages of whats in some blocks, or what changes may or may not occur. get focused guys or you are going to lose any interest you may have left. It is spelled R-A-C-I-N-G and there doesn't seem to be any of it going on. what am i supposed to do with my new Tiger? go look at the blocks and wonder whats in them? thats all its worth right now because there are no RACES that i can even enter, as an F18, NAF18 or whatever you are this week, and we all know where the Hobie fleet is heading. Yes i'm bitter, that is alot of hard earned money that is just sitting on the trailer. an expensive daysailer. i post as anonymous, but i say the same things to anyones face. who says this is not important, but that is posted here might wake some people up. If i am wrong i'd love to hear about the west coast F18 races that are scheduled, or where there might be some 20-boat (or even 10-boat) Tiger starts. I did my part, i bought a boat. I will show up at any race and pay my money. I will work committee, donate my power boat, whatever it takes in addition. But lets go RACING! | | | Re: Hobie rules
[Re: samevans]
#4741 05/30/02 01:31 AM 05/30/02 01:31 AM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | wait a minute.. i bought a Tiger because it is an F18 also...right? or wrong? If not, i got ripped off and am a victim of mis-representation, plain and simple. Someone in the know please clarify...? | | | Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4742 05/30/02 06:58 AM 05/30/02 06:58 AM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Dear Tiger sailor,
You obviously feel "ripped off" and mislead because you were sold a Tiger and apparently promised One-design or Formula racing. This is wrong of the dealer, however quite naive of you. There simply are not enough Tigers around YET to have a one-design class. Nor are there enough NAF-18 class members to have a formula race, especially on the West Coast.
The largest pockets of Tigers are currently in the NY area and in the Georgia/upper Florida area (Hobie Div 9). Even in these pockets, the numbers are not proven large enough for true one design racing (4-5 boats usually). As far as the NAF-18 class, it is strongest in the Mid-West, near its "wizard" Mark Biggers. The NAF-18 guys recently received new Nacra F-18 boats for 4-5 NAF-18 members. Hardly a great "fleet".
My point goes back to my previous posts, stating that racing these classes, as well as the F-18HT, will be best within the Portsmouth Class (scored together and separately). The numbers are not there and I don't see these classes gaining necessary DENSITY (as opposed to total numbers) to acheive more than sporatic one-design or formula racing. The F-18HT class stands the best shot of acheiving this density in the East Coast areas and they are a waiting for the next two loads of customer's boats to acheive this. Even then, the HT guys plan to sail all but their North Americans, W-1000, and World Cup within handicap class (scored separately and together).
Group ALL THE BOATS into classes of similar performance, and score them under handicap and separately as one-design or formula class (for 5 or more 1-designs or formula boats). IMHO, this is the best way to nurture catamaran racing in the USA.
| | | Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4743 05/30/02 09:31 AM 05/30/02 09:31 AM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Thanks for the input... I see your point. It may have been naive of me to buy and assume I could race it, and now I'll just do the best I can. I want to race "one design", and given the realities of this I thought "one formula" was a good compromise. Looks like it may not happen here though! Part of my decision was based on other sailors saying they were going to buy; then they didn't. It's a fun toy anyway and if this is my biggest problem in life then I'm doing well, right? Thanks again, I'll stop whining now and try to do some sailing. Hope the east coast boys realize what they have... sailing this boat I just drool over being able to race it with the chute up in 15-20... enjoy it guys!! | | | Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4744 05/30/02 09:32 AM 05/30/02 09:32 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD Mark Schneider
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD | UH OH!
Hello Feg
Needless to say, I agree with you completely and wish you well in your subsequent debate with Carl! (grin)
Take Care Mark
crac.sailregattas.com
| | | Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4745 05/30/02 12:50 PM 05/30/02 12:50 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Thank you, for your input. But their is only 3 HT sold in North America & not a snow balls chance in Hell of becoming a national fleet. | | | Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4746 05/30/02 02:09 PM 05/30/02 02:09 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | Only 3 F-18HTs sold in North American????????????-I think (know) your info is inaccurate. There are currently 7 HTs sailing here and another 20 or so sold and on order for delivery over the next three months.
I do agree that the HT will not acheive enough DENSITY throughout the USA to offer their own class consistantly in the near future. This is my point! I propose racing within handicap classes and be scored as a both as a formula/one-design AND handicap! | | | Re: Hobie rules
[Re: RCochran]
#4747 05/30/02 02:28 PM 05/30/02 02:28 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | if I may:
I think what Sam means is, that you can make modifications to a Tiger which are perfectly legal under ISAF/NAF-18 rules. However those changes might not be in compliance with the the IHCA Tiger (one-design) rules.
So if you were then to show up at an event which was being governed by the IHCA Tiger class rules, you might have to change those modifications back, to avoid an equipment protest.
A good example might be that you decided to put a non-Hobie (but properly sized) jib on your Tiger. That would be fine in an F-18 event. But other Tiger sailors might object, in an event being run under IHCA Tiger (one design) rules. | | | Re: a couple of points
[Re: samevans]
#4749 05/30/02 08:24 PM 05/30/02 08:24 PM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 39 Ontario, Canada Alan Maguire
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 39 Ontario, Canada | Sam,,,
It is my understanding that US Inter-18's are only allowed to race NAF-18 IF they purchase the new NAF-18 certified sailplans. Which, of course, would give them the same sail area limits as everyone else.
Keep at least one hull in the air !!!
Alan Maguire
| | | Re: a couple of points
[Re: samevans]
#4750 05/30/02 11:31 PM 05/30/02 11:31 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | samevans & feg.. thank you for your input. valuble information. For the record it must be stated that although I may have been persuaded to buy a boat i can not race as much as I would like, it was not the dealer who did that. He showed me the boat: I bought it. Please don't read any more into it than that. It was my sailing peers who talked me into it, and I'll pay them back on the water. When i suggested that I had been duped, it was in regard to the Hobie corporation marketing a boat as F18 compliant, which i now see that it is, with a twist or two. I am learning. Thanks again for the valuable info, & I hope to see you folks on the water some day. I'll enjoy this boat alot as i get over this more and more each day. The boat is awsome, which is even more reason I want to race it. ciao. | | | Re: Conversion factors
[Re: Eric Anderson]
#4751 06/29/02 01:51 PM 06/29/02 01:51 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | | | Re: Tiger is NAF18
[Re: samevans]
#4754 10/25/03 11:08 PM 10/25/03 11:08 PM | Anonymous OP
Unregistered
| Anonymous OP
Unregistered | My birthday cake is a composite material, so was yesterday's lunch and neither have carbon fiber in them. The blocks are not called composite because they have carbon in them. They're called composite because they're made of more than one material. | | |
|
0 registered members (),
322
guests, and 188
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,057 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |