Announcements
New Discussions
Best spinnaker halyard line material?
by '81 Hobie 16 Lac Leman. 03/31/24 10:31 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Carbon blocks [Re: samevans] #4736
04/09/02 12:18 PM
04/09/02 12:18 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Sam,

FYI for the future

Take Care

Bob





From Harekn Tech Support.

Bob,

It is a reference to the color not the element. The blocks are molded from

a long grain plastic of a proprietary material but they do not contain

carbon.

Jim Bourne technical service,



----- Original Message -----

To:

Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:30 AM

Subject: Carbo AirBlocks





> Hello,

>

> Do Carbo AirBlocks have carbon in their construction? My class rules

state

that I can not replace blocks with blocks made of Carbon.

>

> Thank you for your time.

> Bob O'Connor

-- Have You Seen This? --
Re: Tiger is NAF18 [Re: samevans] #4737
04/09/02 04:19 PM
04/09/02 04:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 46
Michigan, USA
RCochran Offline
newbie
RCochran  Offline
newbie

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 46
Michigan, USA
Thanks for the clarification.


Nacra F17 USA 320 We Don't Need No Stinking Jib!
Re: catch 22 - carbon [Re: RCochran] #4738
04/09/02 05:30 PM
04/09/02 05:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390
samevans Offline
enthusiast
samevans  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390
Actually, almost all plastics and rubbers that appear black, or other dark colors, contain Carbon black for UV stabilization.

The Harken catalog even states that their Big Bullet, Dinghy, 2.25" and 3.00" blocks have "Carbon-black filled balls" and "UV stabilized Delrin sheaves and cheeks".

Are these considered deadly "carbon blocks"?

The point I am trying to make is that some knucklehead at Hobie thinks up these arbitrary "rules" and has them approved without properly researching them through.

Here is the rule in question:

"6.6 Replacement blocks or fittings shall not be constructed of exotic materials such as carbon, titanium, etc."

In the first place, carbon is not so "exotic" anymore.

By using the term "Replacement", the onus is on the boat owner to prove that the blocks came on his boat.

What if they are not the original purchaser of the boat?

Now in reality, if every Tiger shows up with the same "carbo/carbon" blocks, then no one will protest, but the screwed up rule is still there.

I have done a lot of contract administration and I just don't like goofy rules.

HEY, a least the Tigers and Foxes are allowed to use an 8:1 mainsheet :-)

Most of us are stuck with a 7:1 or lower :-(

Re: Conversion factors [Re: Eric Anderson] #4739
05/29/02 09:07 PM
05/29/02 09:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 251
beaufort, sc
dannyb9 Offline
enthusiast
dannyb9  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 251
beaufort, sc
ouch! europeans are far less cultured than whom? where did the tiger come from and why?


marsh hawk
Re: Conversion factors [Re: dannyb9] #4740
05/29/02 10:15 PM
05/29/02 10:15 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



who cares? is there any racing going on? or just idle chat and politics? i am ready to switch to a monohull where i can actually go one design racing every week and talk about RACING, not read two pages of whats in some blocks, or what changes may or may not occur. get focused guys or you are going to lose any interest you may have left. It is spelled R-A-C-I-N-G and there doesn't seem to be any of it going on. what am i supposed to do with my new Tiger? go look at the blocks and wonder whats in them? thats all its worth right now because there are no RACES that i can even enter, as an F18, NAF18 or whatever you are this week, and we all know where the Hobie fleet is heading. Yes i'm bitter, that is alot of hard earned money that is just sitting on the trailer. an expensive daysailer. i post as anonymous, but i say the same things to anyones face. who says this is not important, but that is posted here might wake some people up. If i am wrong i'd love to hear about the west coast F18 races that are scheduled, or where there might be some 20-boat (or even 10-boat) Tiger starts. I did my part, i bought a boat. I will show up at any race and pay my money. I will work committee, donate my power boat, whatever it takes in addition. But lets go RACING!

Re: Hobie rules [Re: samevans] #4741
05/30/02 01:31 AM
05/30/02 01:31 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



wait a minute.. i bought a Tiger because it is an F18 also...right? or wrong? If not, i got ripped off and am a victim of mis-representation, plain and simple. Someone in the know please clarify...?

Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4742
05/30/02 06:58 AM
05/30/02 06:58 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Dear Tiger sailor,



You obviously feel "ripped off" and mislead because you were sold a Tiger and apparently promised One-design or Formula racing. This is wrong of the dealer, however quite naive of you. There simply are not enough Tigers around YET to have a one-design class. Nor are there enough NAF-18 class members to have a formula race, especially on the West Coast.



The largest pockets of Tigers are currently in the NY area and in the Georgia/upper Florida area (Hobie Div 9). Even in these pockets, the numbers are not proven large enough for true one design racing (4-5 boats usually). As far as the NAF-18 class, it is strongest in the Mid-West, near its "wizard" Mark Biggers. The NAF-18 guys recently received new Nacra F-18 boats for 4-5 NAF-18 members. Hardly a great "fleet".



My point goes back to my previous posts, stating that racing these classes, as well as the F-18HT, will be best within the Portsmouth Class (scored together and separately). The numbers are not there and I don't see these classes gaining necessary DENSITY (as opposed to total numbers) to acheive more than sporatic one-design or formula racing. The F-18HT class stands the best shot of acheiving this density in the East Coast areas and they are a waiting for the next two loads of customer's boats to acheive this. Even then, the HT guys plan to sail all but their North Americans, W-1000, and World Cup within handicap class (scored separately and together).



Group ALL THE BOATS into classes of similar performance, and score them under handicap and separately as one-design or formula class (for 5 or more 1-designs or formula boats). IMHO, this is the best way to nurture catamaran racing in the USA.




Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4743
05/30/02 09:31 AM
05/30/02 09:31 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Thanks for the input... I see your point. It may have been naive of me to buy and assume I could race it, and now I'll just do the best I can. I want to race "one design", and given the realities of this I thought "one formula" was a good compromise. Looks like it may not happen here though! Part of my decision was based on other sailors saying they were going to buy; then they didn't. It's a fun toy anyway and if this is my biggest problem in life then I'm doing well, right? Thanks again, I'll stop whining now and try to do some sailing. Hope the east coast boys realize what they have... sailing this boat I just drool over being able to race it with the chute up in 15-20... enjoy it guys!!

Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4744
05/30/02 09:32 AM
05/30/02 09:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116
Annapolis, MD
Mark Schneider Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Mark Schneider  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116
Annapolis, MD
UH OH!



Hello Feg

Needless to say, I agree with you completely and wish you well in your subsequent debate with Carl! (grin)



Take Care Mark


crac.sailregattas.com
Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4745
05/30/02 12:50 PM
05/30/02 12:50 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Thank you, for your input. But their is only 3 HT sold in North America & not a snow balls chance in Hell of becoming a national fleet.

Re: NAF-18 and Tiger boat population density #4746
05/30/02 02:09 PM
05/30/02 02:09 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Only 3 F-18HTs sold in North American????????????-I think (know) your info is inaccurate. There are currently 7 HTs sailing here and another 20 or so sold and on order for delivery over the next three months.



I do agree that the HT will not acheive enough DENSITY throughout the USA to offer their own class consistantly in the near future. This is my point! I propose racing within handicap classes and be scored as a both as a formula/one-design AND handicap!

Re: Hobie rules [Re: RCochran] #4747
05/30/02 02:28 PM
05/30/02 02:28 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



if I may:



I think what Sam means is, that you can make modifications to a Tiger which are perfectly legal under ISAF/NAF-18 rules. However those changes might not be in compliance with the the IHCA Tiger (one-design) rules.



So if you were then to show up at an event which was being governed by the IHCA Tiger class rules, you might have to change those modifications back, to avoid an equipment protest.



A good example might be that you decided to put a non-Hobie (but properly sized) jib on your Tiger. That would be fine in an F-18 event. But other Tiger sailors might object, in an event being run under IHCA Tiger (one design) rules.

Re: a couple of points #4748
05/30/02 05:21 PM
05/30/02 05:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390
samevans Offline
enthusiast
samevans  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390
You broke the first rule about racing boat selection: "What boats ARE BEING RACED in my target area". I am sorry that someone sold you a bill of goods about the current market penetration of the Tiger, but you should have known better than to believe a salesman.

But more Tigers are being sold all the time. All of the new Tiger owners I have spoken to(seven) love the boat. It has an excellent history of success in EU too. I am sure that it will have a national presence one day, just not today.

You have a choice of finding where the other Tigers will be racing (they try to meet at certain regattas) and travel with them or going to more local races and trying to build local interest. You would definitely attract a lot of attention as the only Tiger.

On classes.

The Tiger actually qualifies under three different Class organizations.

1) The IHCA Tiger mfg. one-design class. Open to only Hobie Class Rule compliant Tigers. At most Hobie Fleet regattas they will score the Tiger as a Class. The Tiger is the only F18 that is allowed to race at the Hobie midwinters and the NAs (Mega-Event) in Ft. Walton in October.

2) The International F18 Class. Supposedly, all Tigers are built at the factory to fit this rule. BUT, all IF18 rules are not legal Hobie Class rules. You could make IF18 legal changes to a Tiger that are not Hobie Class legal(new sails, etc.), but IHCA is trying to follow some of the IF18 changes.

3) NorthAmericanF18 Class. This is a Class that uses its own set of rules which is similar to the IF18 Class.

It has numerous modifications. These modifications allow US Inter18s to race despite the fact that they have a larger sail area.



So if you keep your boat Hobie Class legal you will be able to race all three classes.

Re: a couple of points [Re: samevans] #4749
05/30/02 08:24 PM
05/30/02 08:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 39
Ontario, Canada
Alan Maguire Offline
newbie
Alan Maguire  Offline
newbie

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 39
Ontario, Canada
Sam,,,



It is my understanding that US Inter-18's are only allowed to race NAF-18 IF they purchase the new NAF-18 certified sailplans. Which, of course, would give them the same sail area limits as everyone else.


Keep at least one hull in the air !!! Alan Maguire
Re: a couple of points [Re: samevans] #4750
05/30/02 11:31 PM
05/30/02 11:31 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



samevans & feg.. thank you for your input. valuble information. For the record it must be stated that although I may have been persuaded to buy a boat i can not race as much as I would like, it was not the dealer who did that. He showed me the boat: I bought it. Please don't read any more into it than that. It was my sailing peers who talked me into it, and I'll pay them back on the water. When i suggested that I had been duped, it was in regard to the Hobie corporation marketing a boat as F18 compliant, which i now see that it is, with a twist or two. I am learning. Thanks again for the valuable info, & I hope to see you folks on the water some day. I'll enjoy this boat alot as i get over this more and more each day. The boat is awsome, which is even more reason I want to race it. ciao.

Re: Conversion factors [Re: Eric Anderson] #4751
06/29/02 01:51 PM
06/29/02 01:51 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Re: Conversion factors [Re: Eric Anderson] #4752
11/05/02 09:41 AM
11/05/02 09:41 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Cape Town, South Africa
Steve_Kwiksilver Offline
addict
Steve_Kwiksilver  Offline
addict

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Cape Town, South Africa
This is by far the best, most informative post on any of the forums I`ve seen so far.
I`ve been watching the F16 forum & have become bored to tears with all the theory - If only they would go sailing some time & relate real information.

Cheers
Steve

Re: History lesson instead of pronostications [Re: Steve_Kwiksilver] #4753
11/05/02 12:13 PM
11/05/02 12:13 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390
samevans Offline
enthusiast
samevans  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 390
You don't mean that the argument about a 8.5 meter mast instead of a 9.0 meter mast doesn't have you giddy with delight?

Anyway, this thread started almost a year ago, so let us look at what has happened.
The F18HT became the next Worrell boat, which spured sales tremendously and should generate some used boats next year.
The Tiger Class has had steady growth throughout NA. Though more have been sold, 26 Tigers made it to Ft Walton Beach for the NA's. Overall, the Mega's had 203 boats.
Hobie Corp has learned to "bend with the wind" on the Tiger Class rules, allowing many of the iF18 "improvements" in quickly.

P.S. And wouter is still doesn't have a boat to race and is still "building" his legendary Tiafoon.

Re: Tiger is NAF18 [Re: samevans] #4754
10/25/03 11:08 PM
10/25/03 11:08 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



My birthday cake is a composite material, so was yesterday's lunch and neither have carbon fiber in them. The blocks are not called composite because they have carbon in them. They're called composite because they're made of more than one material.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Damon Linkous 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 633 guests, and 169 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,405
Posts267,056
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
--Advertisement--
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1