Announcements
New Discussions
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
9:1 cascade for $100 #84778
09/14/06 09:18 AM
09/14/06 09:18 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
I'm soliciting comments before I build this 9:1 cascade (a higher resolution image is attached):

[Linked Image]

The things I like about this design are:
  • It costs about US$100, since I already have a SailCraft Boom, hexa-cat base, and 3/8" mainsheet.
  • All blocks are well within their rated safe working loads, assuming 1250lb total working load. (1250lbs is the SWL rating of the strongest Harken small boat ball bearing traveller car.)
  • The sheet loads are perfectly balanced to not twist the boom.
  • Line loads are aligned with block sheaves
  • Relatively simple construction.
  • I can add another cheek block and another 40mm block to convert to perfectly balanced 13:1 for about $25 more. (By cascading a 2:1 into a 6:1, the block loads are much lower than in a 3:1 into 4:1 cascade.)

My only [minor] concern about the sketch is the block at the front of the boom. When the mainsheet is eased to the limit, the load from the primary to this block will be imperfectly aligned. If this proves to be a problem, I will fix it by replacing the cheek block with a single on a very short pigtail in the same position.

Comments?

Attached Files
85732-9to1.jpg (359 downloads)
-- Have You Seen This? --
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Glenn_Brown] #84779
09/14/06 10:39 AM
09/14/06 10:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 984
2017 F18 Americas Site
Dan_Delave Offline
old hand
Dan_Delave  Offline
old hand

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 984
2017 F18 Americas Site
Glenn:

I count 8 to 1 with the cascading system. What am I missing?

I see a 4 to 1 outside the boom and a doubler inside the boom. I do not think that the sheet coming out of the boom to the bottom block adds any purchase as there will be no more line comimg out of the bottom block than pulls on the doubler block inside the boom.

I hope your boom is stronger than mine, small Tiger round boom, as it looks like too much of a compression load. If you are putting that much in compression it will be ready for any side force to bend or break.

Later,
Dan

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Dan_Delave] #84780
09/14/06 11:31 AM
09/14/06 11:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 131
Ohio
Jamie Diamond Offline
member
Jamie Diamond  Offline
member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 131
Ohio
Dan,

Will the boom get closer to the bottom block as the sheet is pulled? (answer = yes) Then I think there will be more line coming out of the bottom block than pulls on the doubler block inside the boom.

Jamie

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Dan_Delave] #84781
09/14/06 12:05 PM
09/14/06 12:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Quote
I count 8 to 1 with the cascading system. What am I missing?

This was all covered in another thread. (http://www.catsailor.com/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=85080&an=0&page=1#Post85080)

1# of tension on the main sheet gives 2# on the secondary line, for a total of 9# between the traveller and boom.

Quote
I do not think that the sheet coming out of the boom to the bottom block adds any purchase as there will be no more line comimg out of the bottom block than pulls on the doubler block inside the boom.

Pull 9" of line and the boom moves 1" and 8" of line comes out the end of the boom. More line does come out the bottom block than pulls on the doubler.

Quote
I hope your boom is stronger than mine, small Tiger round boom, as it looks like too much of a compression load. If you are putting that much in compression it will be ready for any side force to bend or break.

Yeah, the system would not even fit in the round Tiger boom (and possibly not in the earlier rectangular one).

I have a Sailcraft Tornado boom that measures 1.25"x3.5", and Tornado booms are regularly used to house cascade systems. You can even buy them from Marstrom with much pricier internal cascades.

Thanks for the feedback,
--Glenn

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Dan_Delave] #84782
09/14/06 12:16 PM
09/14/06 12:16 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310
South Carolina
Jake Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Jake  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310
South Carolina
it's 9:1

[Linked Image]


Jake Kohl
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Glenn_Brown] #84783
09/14/06 02:51 PM
09/14/06 02:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 851
US Western Continental Shelf
hobiegary Offline
old hand
hobiegary  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 851
US Western Continental Shelf
Very Beautiful Glenn! Doesn't your boom have an internal outhaul system that may interfere?

GARY


Santa Monica Bay
Mystere 6.0 "Whisk" <--- R.I.P.
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: hobiegary] #84784
09/14/06 03:12 PM
09/14/06 03:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
I have tried the two singles at the bottom before and it gets pretty ugly, also the top is not actually balanced as there is more load on the right hand side, and by putting the blocks on the outside you are giving it more leverage to twist.

Basically you will always have uneven loads in this system whilst you are running the blocks on the sides of the boom. the best way we have designed (yet to build) is to have it all in line. 3:1 inline (block with becket at bottom ans singles inside boom) at the back and 3:1 inside the boom, this should be very free running and gives enough purchase.


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: hobiegary] #84785
09/14/06 03:41 PM
09/14/06 03:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Quote
Very Beautiful Glenn!

Thanks!
Quote
Doesn't your boom have an internal outhaul system that may interfere?

I've removed it, though I will probably trim and use the Sailcraft outhaul car, which travels in a slot in the top of the boom and is a diamond-shaped piece of
stainless that looks something like this, where '*' is a delrin roller, 'o' is a hole, and '.' nothing:
. .___
. / o \
_/_____\____________ _ _
|\* . */
| \_o_/
|
|______________________ _ _

I'll just cut it down to this:
. .___
. / o \
_/_____\____________ _ _
|\*___*/
|
|
|______________________ _ _

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: macca] #84786
09/15/06 03:19 PM
09/15/06 03:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Macca,

Thanks for the feedback!

I don't see what you mean when you say
Quote
the top is not actually balanced as there is more load on the right hand side
. If you look at the aft view, and note that the becket is mounted on the side of the mast, then it should be clear that there is no torque to twist the boom around its long axis, since each secondary line on the outside of the boom is matched by another on the opposite side that is equally loaded. (That's why the becket is placed where it is: on the side.)

It is true that there is more boom compression load on the right side of the boom than the left. That might bow the boom microscopically, but should not twist it.

Thanks for the note about the singles low causing trouble. I am anticipating some possible trouble there. I could just use a double (or tripple) and keep it down low to minimize the angle, but I think I want to try this out for jollies, and possibly create a silicone+line composite structure to keep those blocks loosely organized, but where they can still move.

Quote
the best way we have designed (yet to build) is to have it all in line. 3:1 inline (block with becket at bottom [and] singles inside boom) at the back and 3:1 inside the boom, this should be very free running and gives enough purchase.


That would certainly eliminate any boom twisting.

I'm trying to stay away from anything less then 4:1 in the secondary because I don't want to spend the $$ on high load ball bearing blocks for the secondary system. The downside is that I must use more blocks as a result, meaning more friction. The up side is that I can use much cheaper blocks. Also, since the extra blocks are in the secondary, where I'll be using small diameter vectran, I expect drag won't be an issue.

Anyway, your claim that the system will twist has got me riled, and I guess I'll have to build the system to prove you wrong. ;-) While I'm at it, I think I'll at the extra blocks to make this a 13:1 / 9:1 convertable system since you seem happy with yours, though mine will use 2:1+4:1 and 2:1+6:1 to achieve the advantage, where yours uses 3:1+3:1 and 3:1+4:1.

I'll keep you posted.

--Glenn

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Glenn_Brown] #84787
09/15/06 04:02 PM
09/15/06 04:02 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
The system wil lfor sure load more to one side than the other, but it is not such a big problem, we have this problem on our system and it it fine but we have just tried to minimise the issue. Also it is only really adding friction right at the end of the travel when you have max sheet tension, you might not need as much as we do so you will not have the problem as much.


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Glenn_Brown] #84788
09/15/06 04:09 PM
09/15/06 04:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe


My concern is that when you sheet out the boom was partially move sideways and skew the pull of the lines off the vertical and have them wear on the sides of the cheek block or jam themselfs between the sheeve and sides.

But it is definately a good and simple design. Lets see if we can get it better still.

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Wouter] #84789
09/16/06 12:19 AM
09/16/06 12:19 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Quote
My concern is that when you sheet out the boom was partially move sideways and skew the pull of the lines off the vertical and have them wear on the sides of the cheek block or jam themselfs between the sheeve and sides.


I expect the boom to rotate around it's round gooseneck pin, so no problem there, I believe.

Quote
But it is definately a good and simple design.


Thanks.

Quote
Lets see if we can get it better still.


Definitely.

Thanks for the feedback,
--Glenn

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Glenn_Brown] #84790
10/03/08 03:24 PM
10/03/08 03:24 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Glenn,

did you ever get around to testing this system? Would be very interesting to hear about your experiences with it.

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #84791
10/04/08 07:32 AM
10/04/08 07:32 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 96
Budapest, Hungary, Europe
CatSailingHu Offline
journeyman
CatSailingHu  Offline
journeyman

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 96
Budapest, Hungary, Europe
Glenn,

a few years ago I made a similar system for my old panthercraft, the only difference my system was 1:10, I think.

Attached Files
159684-P1050141.JPG (110 downloads)

Sanyi
Nacra Infusion
www.catsailing.hu
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: CatSailingHu] #84792
10/04/08 08:51 AM
10/04/08 08:51 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Nice setup!

How did you like the system? Is there anything you would have done differently?

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #84793
10/04/08 09:46 AM
10/04/08 09:46 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 96
Budapest, Hungary, Europe
CatSailingHu Offline
journeyman
CatSailingHu  Offline
journeyman

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 96
Budapest, Hungary, Europe
No, It was working really great! It was one of the best system I have ever used.

Now I checked Glenn drawing again I identified a lot of differences, but that setup also could work.


Sanyi
Nacra Infusion
www.catsailing.hu
Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: CatSailingHu] #84794
10/07/08 11:45 AM
10/07/08 11:45 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Glenn, you out there?

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #84795
10/08/08 10:03 AM
10/08/08 10:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
I've fabricated the 9:1, and will post pictures soon. I'm very pleased with the result.

I haven't sailed with it because I have yet to fit an outhaul, and have been too busy to sail for 18 months (ouch!), but I have managed outfit my new mast, build a mast step with integral downhaul and mast rotation control, interface the new boom to the new mast, and build the 9:1 system. I hope to be back on the water soon. Hopefully before I have time to add a self-tacker and snuffer. ;-)

--Glenn

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Glenn_Brown] #84796
10/08/08 10:12 AM
10/08/08 10:12 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
OooOOoOoo, you got to post pictures of it all!

Re: 9:1 cascade for $100 [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #84797
10/10/08 03:43 PM
10/10/08 03:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Glenn_Brown Offline OP
member
Glenn_Brown  Offline OP
member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
CA
Here it is.

I've not yet mounted the outhaul, or even settled on the design. Suggestions?

Oh, I've not cut the red line to length yet. I'll do that the first time I use the system.

Careful observers will note that the aft internally-mounted cheek blocks are co-axial, but aligned differently. Each is aligned inline with the expected loads. (One is vertical, and the other is tilted 45 degrees aft.)

The Ronstan cheek blocks were a perfect fit inside this Sailcraft extrusion. The aft large sheave is a Harken, and I used T6061 1/4" AL plate to make the aft fairing.

See my earlier diagram to get an idea how this system works.

All internal blocks are mounted with screws all the way through the boom, and internal Nylon spacers, to prevent line snags inside the boom.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Damon Linkous 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 46 guests, and 245 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
diveboy, Carlos_Mata_Virgem, bfriendly, BlairC, Skahahobie
8093 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,385
Posts267,020
Members8,093
Most Online1,650
Sep 10th, 2019
--Advertisement--
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1