no word on the IJ decisions this morning...but they did already rule on two significant issues before them yesterday.
1) whether the hearing should be open to media or not. Alinghi said no, BMWO said yes, IJ said yes.
2) Alingh countered that BMWO is not entitled to redress because it was speculative and no damage to BMWO has taken place. BMWO countered that the rules contain the word "possible damage" in regards the NOR redress rule #62. IJ ruled that BMWO is entitled to file for redress on these issues.
They're in the meeting now - apparently none of the media are texting reports out to the public like we had in the New York court hearings...but we should hear something soon.
