weezy,
Who is stupid enough to believe the garbage you spew?

You are not a structural engineer, or a materials engineer, or a metalurgical engineer, or an aerospace emgineer,
or an aeronautical engineer or a marine engineer, and yet you have the nerve to critisize REAL engineers and builders
who have more years of experience designing and building boats than you have been walking.

You talk like the f16 class is somehow unique and unlike any other Class in the world, which it is not.
It is just another formula class, except you used the specs of an existing, successful, 16 year old design,
the Taipan 4.9, as the basis for your so-called "new" formula.
And for the hundredth time, the Taipan was originally designed with a spinnaker, long before you ever sailed anything.
The other Formulas had snuffers, self-tackers, curve tracks, raised cross-bars, etc, etc, before the f16.
The blade is just another rip-off of the Flyer design.
The f16 has been anything BUT a leader in design.

Name one single innovation fron the f16 Class.

The only thing unique about the f16 Class is that there is no true class organization.
YOU run it as your own little club.

Feathers falling faster than lead?
In what reality?
It is absolutly impossible to compress feathers into a density higher than lead.
I guess you never read about this experiment a guy did where he dropped two different size and weight cannon balls
off of a building and they both hit the ground at the same time.
His name was Galileo and the building was the Tower of Pisa.
But of course YOU are smarter than him.

You seem to think if keep repeating the same lies over and over again, they will one day become true.
NOT!!!