"That's it, I'm goin' to Disney World" was rhetorical. I did the vector math (with 23 points, not 4), worked up an Excel sheet and I got lift. In addition to no net flow deflection, I also got no drag, so what good is this circulation nonsense?

Oh yeah, I got lift. And without all that mess of viscosity, Reynolds number, boundary layers, separation points and 3D, Navier-Stokes CFD codes. The spinning cylinder example you posted earlier doesn't have any net deflection, either, nor any drag.

deseely, my question for you is, how does all that downward deflected air from simple Newtonian physics hold up the airplane? In F=ma, how do you measure or estimate mathematically the mass of air moved and its acceleration in order to calculate your lift force? Also, how and where is that lift force applied to the wing?

Crack smoking circulationists have used circulation and idea of superposition of flows to develop a very successful aerodynamic modeling tool called panel methods** for estimating forces on a body. Including in three dimensions. If they can do it, I would hope that simple Newtonian physics could do the same.

** - PMARC is just an example. I liked it because in the description, they use the term "ficticious flow." So what comes from circulation really is cracksmoking bs.