| IPX8 Watertight water rating? #101044 03/20/07 07:34 AM 03/20/07 07:34 AM |
Joined: May 2002 Posts: 3,114 BANNED MauganN20 OP
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114 BANNED | Does anyone have any insight on how "water tight" an IPX8 rating is? I'm investigating a new insulin pump, and all of the ones I'm looking at have a "durability rating" or something. The one I'm particularly interested in ( http://www.myomnipod.com/products/section/188) has an IPX8 rating. Now I know a lot of our GPS's have a water tight rating, and that many of us have put that rating to the test. The firehose treatment we can get while on the boat is something that can't quite be measured. If anyone has any experiences with blowing up an IPX8 device while sailing, I'd like to hear it so I can ask the sales rep about it. Thanks! | | | Re: IPX8 Watertight water rating?
[Re: MauganN20]
#101045 03/20/07 08:35 AM 03/20/07 08:35 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | Actually, there is a firehose rating. IPX8 is about as good as it gets. However, there is some wiggle room in that I've seen components to meet IPX7 but not IPX5 - the rating scale is not necessarily sequential. IP stands for "ingress protection". The following digits ('characteristic numerals') indicate conformity with the conditions summarized in the tables below. Where there is no protection rating with regard to one of the criteria, the digit is replaced with the letter X.
First digit
The First digit indicates the level of protection that the enclosure provides against access to hazardous parts (e.g., electrical conductors, moving parts) and the ingress of solid foreign objects.
Level Object size protected against Effective against 0 — no protection against contact and ingress of objects 1 >50 mm any large surface of the body, such as the back of a hand, but no protection against deliberate contact with a body part 2 >12.5 mm fingers or similar objects 3 >2.5 mm tools, thick wires, etc. 4 >1 mm most wires, screws, etc. 5 dust protected ingress of dust is not entirely prevented, but it must not enter in sufficient quantity to interfere with the satisfactory operation of the equipment; complete protection against contact 6 dust tight no ingress of dust; complete protection against contact
Second digit Protection of the equipment inside the enclosure against harmful ingress of water. Level Protected against Details 0 not protected — 1 dripping water Dripping water (vertically falling drops) shall have no harmful effect. 2 dripping water when tilted up to 15° Vertically dripping water shall have no harmful effect when the enclosure is tilted at an angle up to 15° from its normal position. 3 spraying water Water falling as a spray at any angle up to 60° from the vertical shall have no harmful effect. 4 splashing water Water splashing against the enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effect. 5 water jets Water projected by a nozzle against enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effects. 6 heavy seas Water from heavy seas or projected in powerful jets shall not enter the enclosure in harmful quantities. 7 immersion up to 1 m Ingress of water in harmful quantity shall not be possible when the enclosure is immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time (up to 1 m of submersion). 8 immersion beyond 1 m The equipment is suitable for continuous immersion in water under conditions which shall be specified by the manufacturer. NOTE: Normally, this will mean that the equipment is hermetically sealed. However, with certain types of equipment, it can mean that water can enter but only in such a manner that produces no harmful effects.
Additional letters
The standard defines additional letters that can be appended to classify only the level of protection against access to hazardous parts by persons: Level Protected against access to hazardous parts with A back of hand B finger C tool D wire
Further letters can be appended to provide additional information related to the protection of the device: Letter Meaning H high voltage device M device moving during water test S device standing still during water test W weather conditions
Thanks Wikipedia.
Jake Kohl | | | Re: IPX8 Watertight water rating?
[Re: Jake]
#101046 03/20/07 08:45 AM 03/20/07 08:45 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | If I remember correctly, most of our GPS units are IP67 - but I've certainly seen them fail the firehose (waterjet)
Jake Kohl | | | Re: IPX8 Watertight water rating?
[Re: MauganN20]
#101050 03/20/07 12:16 PM 03/20/07 12:16 PM |
Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL waterbug_wpb
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL | So a drysuit wouldn't qualify? Sort of a big spray bag, isn't it?
I gotta hand it to your determination...
Jay
| | | Re: IPX8 Watertight water rating?
[Re: MauganN20]
#101054 03/22/07 12:06 PM 03/22/07 12:06 PM |
Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 306 St. Louis, MO hobienick
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 306 St. Louis, MO | I have a friend who works at Insulet. Contact me offline and I will get you his email. BTW, they claim you can wear them while swimming. I would be more concerned that it would fall off before it would allow water in.
hobienick at gmail dot com
Nick
Current Boat Looking for one
Previous Boats '84 H16 '82 H18 Magnum '74 Pearson 30 St. Louis, MO
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
612
guests, and 30
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |