| Spreader Rake question #11053 09/28/02 08:09 AM 09/28/02 08:09 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | I'm using a prebent rig, with about an inch and 3/4 spreader rake. I'm finding that my mast is consistently under-rotating, and my old rotator is a tad under-powered to get it just right. For good reasons, I like my old rotator. It's self tending, self tacking, and sets with one pull on a bungie, and can't dismast me if I forget it on a hot jibe or tack, for the twin reasons that I'm supposed to forget it (self tacking), and that the bungie will just pull out of the camcleats. I'd sure hate to lose it.
My thinking is, if I rake the spreaders more, the axis of bend (least resistance) should move; for example clockwise on port tack, (CCwise on starboard). So if the axis of bend moves clockwise on port, the mast should rotate further counter-clockwise so as to line that axis up with the load, right? And on port tack, when you add rotation, you're rotating the mast counter-clockwise. Sounds like a go, right? I'm nervous....
Allright, here's the question for the real experts out there:
Clearly, if it really was that simple, i.e.: "Rake your spreaders more until your mast rotates properly by itself, less if it over-rotates" then people would be doing it. So what'm I missing here? If you rake 'em too far you're not supporting the short cross-section of your mast, and it fails? How far is too far in that case? Or is it something else I'm not seeing?
Thanks, and...
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | | Re: Spreader Rake question
[Re: Ed Norris]
#11055 09/28/02 05:44 PM 09/28/02 05:44 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,449 phill
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449 | Ed,
I'm no expert but I have played with this a little.
If when raking your spreaders you get more mast bend then it will make the mast less inclined to rotate down wind.
But as mark says. You can reduce your prebend so the mast will rotate better but in the same action stuff up the sail/ mast relationship and go like a dog on every other point of sail.
Another point that can limit mast rotation is where the diamond wires attach to the mast.
If this is too high up they will cross the sidestays when the mast rotates. This action effectively has to tighten the rig or stop rotating any further.
Depending on the class of boat there are limits where this attachment point can be.
I'm not advocating you change the attachment point for your dimonds just bringing this to your attention as another possible cause.
A possible sollution to this is rigging the boat a little looser in the first place but this can also have a side affect in as much as it can affect forestay sag on some boats which can have a detrimental affect on your boats ability to point.
I will send you an email of a video I have just taken of a positive mast rotation system that I have just put on my boat.
It may help, it may not.
Regards,
Phill
I know that the voices in my head aint real, but they have some pretty good ideas. There is no such thing as a quick fix and I've never had free lunch!
| | | Re: Spreader Rake Clarification
[Re: Sailing Pro Shop]
#11056 09/28/02 08:48 PM 09/28/02 08:48 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | HI, Mark, Phill,
Thanks for getting back to me.
My post isn't terribly clear. I'm definitely not contemplating using my prebend to affect rotation. Like you, I devoutly believe the curve of the mast must be appropriate (Note, not "identical") to the luff curve of the sail, and I plan to continue to follow my sailmaker's advice on how much the mast actually is pre-bent.
I'm considering if spreader rake, without changing prebend amount, can be used to affect how the mast rotates. I completely agree that the amount the mast is pre-bent must not be changed when considering a different spreader rake.
In looking over your post, I see where we might be disconnecting, here. Are you guys saying that if your mast exhibits a certain amount of prebend, say, an inch, and you rake your spreaders more, then tune your diamonds for that same inch of prebend, you still have a different rig? My point is, it'll rotate differently; what else is different? (Provided you still have an inch of prebend)
I guess the paramount question is: How far can you rake your spreaders without causing your mast to fail?
(One hint on this question: The tangs on my mast which attach to my diamonds, the top ones, are aimed at a point further aft than the tips of my spreaders are at now. Does this imply the mast is engineered to tolerate more radically raked spreaders?)
Thanks again for taking the time to consider this; I hope I've been clearer this time.
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | | can you say over complicate?
[Re: Ed Norris]
#11057 09/29/02 01:37 AM 09/29/02 01:37 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 733 Home is where the harness is..... Will_R
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 733 Home is where the harness is..... | This is not a complicated matter.... just like with anything else on these boat, KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.... I try to live by it on the water...less chance of a robust simple setup breaking. Set your mast, rudders...etc for the most/best power. THEN deal with your other problems (helm, rotation, etc) w/o messing with you sail tune. Don't use your diamonds to help rotate your mast... Mark has it right.
The position of spreader and tension not only set the initial state of the mast, but also dictate how the mast will react under load (sheeting/dh..etc) So, by screwing with your sweep, you may not change how much INITIAL prebend you have, but you WILL change the bend characteristics of the mast. It may then depower too quickly or not quickly enough or just not bend properly to suit the sail (inversion/poor shape).
Another interisting point... on a Nacra 6.0 or other boomless rigs, battens make a HUGE difference in how your mast rotates...
like Mark said, on a boomed boat, move the bail aft. Personally I think there is a problem in your rotation system if the mast is not rotating properly. I hate those auto bunge systems. They don't rotate far enough and move too much...
Unless you have a "personal" sail maker (Randy/Saber/other) cut your sails for YOU, you have to be careful with the numbers you might get. I got a brand new set of sails for my 6.0 ~2-3 yrs back (sold it)... called EP sails and they gave me mast/batten settings...well... they were WAY off. For doing the initial setting, measureing your sail and mast is best, but once you start to know your rig, you can adjust based on feel.
I don't remember who said it, but one of the masters said, "I just try to get my boat in the ballpark....the rest is sailing..."
my 2 c's
Will_R | | | Re: can you say over complicate?
[Re: Will_R]
#11058 09/29/02 02:42 AM 09/29/02 02:42 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | Thanks, Will. My sails were made by Randy Smyth, personally for me. I started out using his batten numbers, prebend and rake settings. Most of the top half of my sail wouldn't flatten, no matter how hard I DHauled (18:1) and sheeted (6:1). So I increased the amount of prebend slightly, and the sloppy luff got better, and the deep pocket got somewhat flatter, but still deeper than I like. So I'm already experimenting with getting this beauty dialed in... so I'm in no way convinced the spreader rake is necessarily dialed in right already. So in experimenting for the right spreader rake, what explicitly should I be looking for when I sail test it... what specific effects does too much/little rake have? (Other than the change in rotation) And I totally agree with you on the K.I.S.S. principle - that's why I have a one piece bungie rotator in the first place! I can solo my sloop rigged 5.0 and keep up in a tacking duel handily, partly because I never have to touch the rotator. Sorry you don't like them I guess as I predicted in my first post, this is not the way to go... I'll just beef up my bungie and let the spreaders find their proper setting independently. Thanks again,
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | | Re: There ya go....
[Re: Will_R]
#11061 09/30/02 08:47 AM 09/30/02 08:47 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | Hi, Will,
Thanks for all the advice. Randy built me a square top, since I'm more interested in sailing as hot a boat as I can than in one-design on a 5.0! I'm gonna be in a portsmouth fleet whenever I race anyway, eh?
AM I correct that by "sweep" you mean the amount of rake in the spreaders? I've been gradually tweaking up and have hit 2.0" My prebend is up to about 2" as well, measured standing up, unloaded. As I had hoped and you just predicted, this weekend's sail showed a cleaner luff, with less DH, so the top leach stayed firm with less mainsheet, meaning the whole sail did more work. Amazing how the top leach on a square top is so responsive to DH!! Before this latest increase to prebend, I needed to DH so much to clean up the luff that the top wasn't willing to stay on the job without heavy sheeting, which flattened the bottom of the luff but left the top luff very deep indeed. A teensy bit more prebend later, things are much better.
I think I've finally entered the useful prebend range, just on the "Light air" end... I'll just dial up the prebend slightly now for medium and heavy air; it's still a little full to really go fast.
Oh, yeah! It rotates slightly easier since I added the last 2and1/2 turns on the spreader adjusters, bringing my spreader rake up to 2". Thanks for telling me that 2" wasn't extreme. I'm less nervous to be back that far, now.
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | | Eureka!
[Re: Matt M]
#11062 09/30/02 09:04 AM 09/30/02 09:04 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | Thanks, Matt!
That's exactly what I needed to hear, and it agrees with my experiences this weekend. I needed to have a slightly softer mast with slightly more prebend. I could have just tightened the diamonds to get more bend, but then the harder mast wouldn't have flattened in response to sheeting. So when I raked more, while thinking about rotation, what also happened, was it slightly exposed my short mast-axis to bending load, making a softer mast, with slightly more prebend! That's why it worked. This weekend's sail went well, see post below.
So Mark as usual is right of course, you can't just lightly screw around with spreaders while thinking only about rotation, it just happened that I needed more rake, for other reasons, which I didn't initially go into in my original post, not wanting to dog on a hugely excellent sail, withoug good reason to drag it into the discussion.
Eureka!!
So, the simplified rule-of-thumb (on a prebent rig) is:
More rake gives you a softer mast by allowing you to get the same prebend with less diamond tension; incidentally it lets the mast rotate more too. Less rake does the opposite.
(Naturally, you have to understand your sail and what it needs before you change your rake.)
Anybody notice any other effects of changing spreader rake?
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | | Re:S-curve?
[Re: DSievert]
#11064 10/01/02 09:24 AM 10/01/02 09:24 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | Hey Don,
Stupid question: What precisely is S-curve? Is it when the leach makes an 's' with the very edge, as seen from behind the sail, or do your battens actually bend off near the leach in an 's' shape, as viewed from the top down?
Maybe I need to look more carefully, but I've not noticed either condition. (Except for the squaretop opening up the top leach under heavy heavy DH; but that's a design goal, right?)
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | | Re: Inverts?
[Re: DSievert]
#11066 10/02/02 08:27 AM 10/02/02 08:27 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 292 Long Island, NY Ed Norris OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 292 Long Island, NY | Sorry to be such a dope, Don.
You mean the top third actually pops inside out, with belly to windward, etc? I do get that sometimes, when tacking, the sail needs to be 'popped' over to the other side and the top third is the last to go over. You mean that can happen other times?
Or are you saying proper mast tuning will reduce the difficulty popping the sail when tacking?
Thanks
Sail Fast,
Ed Norris
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
658
guests, and 31
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |