Announcements
New Discussions
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Jalani] #133680
02/29/08 09:20 AM
02/29/08 09:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Timbo Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Timbo  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Sue is Macca spelled backwards... <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


Blade F16
#777
--Advertisement--
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: GBR6] #133681
02/29/08 09:29 AM
02/29/08 09:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
Quote
Wouter I don't really follow your constant comparisons with F18's; do you think these are potential F16 sailors that just need to be convinced by your wonderful machines? In the UK I would have thought that Spitfires, Shadows and H16 saiors are the likely target market with Fathers(or mothers) sailing with children or alone. To me that seems a real strong selling point and one that might attract me in the future. Sailing as I do at the moment (me 90kgs, good, regular and reliable crew at 60 ish) then the F18 suits me perfectly and I've certainly not been blown away by an F16 at any UK event. If I was lighter and needed to sail singlehanded regularly then the F16 would certainly be on potential shopping list, probably along with Shadow and FX-1. In terms of weight I don't mind the F18 around the dinghy park, it's a fraction of the time I spend on the water. However I would be concerned over whether or not I could right the boat alone, my F18 I would say not in the light stuff and the same for a Spitfire - for me that would be a compelling reason for the class to control the minimum weight so you do not lose a chunk of your potential market.


The F18 sounds like the right boat for you. Some of us, however, don't have your crew situation. There's the rub. If you had no crew how would you race?

The F16 is a versatile solution for those of us with crew problems.

Additionally, some lighter weight crews (2 people) find the F18 cumbersome.

The H16 sailors of my acquaitance are either commited to the boat until death <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />, or want an inexpensive boat. Where they are teaching a young person, they don't want the complication of a spinnaker.

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Jalani] #133682
02/29/08 09:32 AM
02/29/08 09:32 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 242
Brisveagas
Aido Offline
enthusiast
Aido  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 242
Brisveagas
What so just because i share similar veiws, i must be the same person. I sail a H16. And I just ran the numbers and i can get a spanking new tiger for cheaper than the stealth the viper and the blade with carbon mast. According to the viper website i cant get a minimum weight one of them.

Look it wasn't my intention to put you guys offside. I just dont wnat to spend a truck load of money on a boat that would be left wanting by a boat that was 20 Kilos lighter. I don't have the time or the inclination to build my own. So unfortunatly i would have to rely on one of the Big Bad manufacturers to supply me with a boat.

From what ive seen the class would rather keep the major manufacturers out to suit a few homebuilders. Therefore majorly limiting the growth of the class.

Sue


Aido
Viper 288
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: fin.] #133683
02/29/08 09:43 AM
02/29/08 09:43 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
G
GBR6 Offline
journeyman
GBR6  Offline
journeyman
G

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
Quote
[quote]

The F18 sounds like the right boat for you. Some of us, however, don't have your crew situation. There's the rub. If you had no crew how would you race?

The F16 is a versatile solution for those of us with crew problems.

Additionally, some lighter weight crews (2 people) find the F18 cumbersome.

The H16 sailors of my acquaitance are either commited to the boat until death <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />, or want an inexpensive boat. Where they are teaching a young person, they don't want the complication of a spinnaker.


Agree absolutely but that's my point - The F16 and F18 really appeal to different markets (imo) which is why I don't really follow the shots at the F18. As I said, if I had no regular crew (or one of the two padwans takes an interest in a few years time) than the F16 would certainly be on the horizon; which is probably why I'm taking an interest now.
And to answer Mark's question on a now locked thread; for me the class would NOT have to have Hobie or NACRA on board BUT, if the F104 class became a big player then that might influence a potential choice. That said I think the F16's I've seen around the UK look good, are sailed by enthusiastic and sociable sailors so I'd like to see the class evolve.

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Aido] #133684
02/29/08 10:23 AM
02/29/08 10:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Jalani Offline
veteran
Jalani  Offline
veteran

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Quote
This Forum doesn't seem to be that "laid back" or that "friendly". I guess ill just have to keep sailing my crappy production boat at 127 kgs crew weight. At least its the same weight as all the other crappy productions boats of the same class.

Im very disappointed with the classes overall attitude.

xxxooo Sue


Sue, if that's your real name, I wouldn't describe a H16 as a 'crappy production boat' well, not unless you were referring to the quality? <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> H16s are BRILLIANT boats! They are simple, fast(ish) and sooooo much fun to sail! I can't think of a time when I haven't enjoyed a sail on a H16. Honest truth!

However, to use a H16 as an example of boats being equal within a class is a classic mistake. Show me five H16s and I'll show you 5 different weights with a range of 5Kg plus between them. Hell, I knew of a newish (2001) H16 that had one hull almost 2Kg heavier than the other! and it was like that from new.

Getting so wound up on weight is just not sensible. F16 is a boxrule class, the boats are not identical, that's the point! We set max and min dimensions as appropriate, if your boat fits into the box and is above minimum weight you can race as F16. An optimised F16 should be built to the maximum and minimum tolerances but in practice that is difficult to achieve and that is how it should be. Having said that, the latest -2007 onward- VWM, Stealth and FCA boats are within a couple of kilos of or even slightly below minimum and require corrector weights. If you want to get right down to minimum weight with a design(since that is your fixation) you may well have to sacrifice some hull volume as that equals less laminate area but that will affect your performance in some conditions. You wouldn't sacrifice layup or strength as that would be completely pointless. You could save a few kilos in a careful choice of rudder stocks etc. You could decide not to take that 2 litre bottle of water with you when you go out, don't fit a compass etc. etc. A big saving would be a carbon mast - around £800 complete here in the UK. (That's about £200 more expensive than an aluminium one) A relatively cheap upgrade when you look at what the As spend on weight saving.

The point is it's a 'run what you brung' class. No, the boats aren't equal in all conditions (that would be a different type of class, it's called One Design) but without doubt, proved time and time again, the biggest difference between the boats is the people on board. In my 40ish tears of competitive sailing I've sailed many, many different types of catamarans (and dinghies) but I haven't ever had as much (consistent) fun as I've had with my F16. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

Oh. BTW I don't know where on earth ANYONE got the impression that the F16 rules were open to discussion or change by a straw poll on an open forum. There is a due process for proposing a change to rules and it has to be well constructed and logical in it's reasoning with sound facts and research to back it up. Not unreasonably, the members then get the opportunity to vote either for or against the proposal - it's called DEMOCRACY.


John Alani
___________
Stealth F16s GBR527 and GBR538
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Aido] #133685
02/29/08 10:33 AM
02/29/08 10:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Timbo Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Timbo  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Quote
What so just because i share similar veiws, i must be the same person. I sail a H16. And I just ran the numbers and i can get a spanking new tiger for cheaper than the stealth the viper and the blade with carbon mast. According to the viper website i cant get a minimum weight one of them.

So get a spanking new Tiger, want to guess what it weighs?



Look it wasn't my intention to put you guys offside. I just dont wnat to spend a truck load of money on a boat that would be left wanting by a boat that was 20 Kilos lighter. I don't have the time or the inclination to build my own. So unfortunatly i would have to rely on one of the Big Bad manufacturers to supply me with a boat.

The Big Bad Manf. don't build F16's and probably won't, for all the reasons Macca has too many times mentioned. It takes real builder skills to get the boats down to minimum wt. and the Big Boys (Hobie and Nacra) are just not interested in putting that kind of effort into such a small customer base, especially when it might be taking customers away from a boat they all ready dominate, the F18's.

From what ive seen the class would rather keep the major manufacturers out to suit a few homebuilders. Therefore majorly limiting the growth of the class.

Sue


"The Class" couldn't care less if the Big Boys get involved or not. There is a minimum boat weight. Most of us have no idea what our boats weigh because it is nearly impossible to weigh them correctly at home, and there are very few reliable scales available at regattas. I can honestly say I have NEVER seen a scale at any regatta, that includes the Alter Cup.

So here's the deal with the F16 class and boat weights. You either want a light, fast, 16 foot boat with the ability to race Uni or 2 up, with a spinnaker, or you don't. There are other classes available to you, go there.

If you think being at min. wt. is a big deal, pay your money and get as much carbon on board as you can, and keep weighing your boat, and you will have no problem getting to min. wt.

There was a guy who Pimped his F18HT back a few years ago, maxed it out per the rules, rumor is he spent about $50,000 doing it. And it killed the class as nobody else wanted to spend that kind of money to play catch up. Is that what you want?

I'm happy to sail a stock factory boat and trust the builder has done a good job trying to keep them all even and at or near min. wt.


Blade F16
#777
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Jalani] #133686
02/29/08 10:38 AM
02/29/08 10:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479
Thailand
Buccaneer Offline
veteran
Buccaneer  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479
Thailand
Quote
Quote
This Forum doesn't seem to be that "laid back" or that "friendly". I guess ill just have to keep sailing my crappy production boat at 127 kgs crew weight. At least its the same weight as all the other crappy productions boats of the same class.

Im very disappointed with the classes overall attitude.

xxxooo Sue


Doesn't anyone else smell something fishy around here? I wonder if 'Sue' has been known to sail a certain Taipan 5.7?


Now this is getting entertaining... <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


"House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals." – Ben Bernanke – 2005
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: GBR6] #133687
02/29/08 11:33 AM
02/29/08 11:33 AM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Adrian, I didn't take Wouter's comments as a shot at the F18 - in fact he has always been very complimentary towards the 18 as a class, weight notwithstanding. I think his point was just that the cost of an F18 is an important point of comparison when evaluating some of the misinformation that gets thrown around about a supposed imminent arms race in the F16.

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: ] #133688
02/29/08 11:50 AM
02/29/08 11:50 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
G
GBR6 Offline
journeyman
GBR6  Offline
journeyman
G

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
Fair enough Mark, my comment was slightly based on a post that Wouter subsequently deleted but also that to my mind the two classes are very different and don't really bare comparison. As and aside my Capricorn was less than 6 months old and cost less than a brand new F16 would have when I bought it.

In the UK a more realistic comparison is probably the Spitfire (16ft long, almost f16ish) and costs just under £9k but weighing 140kg. Interestingly its little sister, the Shadow weighs in at 95kgs is made of kevlar but costs almost as much at £500 less. Neither of which offer (imo) the vesatility of the F16 but do perhaps highlight some of the cost considerations in building light boats.

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: GBR6] #133689
02/29/08 11:56 AM
02/29/08 11:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
It may be just coincidence, but here in the Southeastern U.S. interest in the F18 seems to have fallen off as the F16 picked-up.

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: fin.] #133690
02/29/08 12:24 PM
02/29/08 12:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 549
Knokke-Heist - Belgium
Gilo Offline
addict
Gilo  Offline
addict

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 549
Knokke-Heist - Belgium
Hi all,

If we want to come out to the world as a professional racing class I DO think that meeting the minimum weight is important for manufacturers.
I personally do think that 5kg can make a difference, certainly on a higher level. I don't think 1 Tornade is 1kg overweight on the Olympics, nor are F18 on their worlds...
If we say that 5 kg aren't that important, why hold on to the weight to badly?

I don't want to shake things up and I do think discussing weight should be done after proper examination (discussion with none F16 manufacturers and F16 manufacturers, top sailors, ...) and with a smaller group of people.

Gill


Falcon F16 - BEL666
Boats: TheBoatShop.be
Stories: bladef16.blogspot.com
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Gilo] #133691
02/29/08 01:25 PM
02/29/08 01:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Timbo Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Timbo  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Personally, I don't want to be part of a "proffesional racing class" ala Tornados or even A cats and some of the F18 Pro's. It gets much too expensive as everyone chases the illusive -ultimate boat-, ultimate sails, minimum wt, carbon everyting, etc.

I would prefer it remain an amature class, with people who race for fun, not for career advancement or, God forbid, Money! <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" />


Blade F16
#777
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Timbo] #133692
02/29/08 01:33 PM
02/29/08 01:33 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Quote

I would prefer it remain an amature class, with people who race for fun, not for career advancement or, God forbid, Money!

I second that.

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Timbo] #133693
02/29/08 02:05 PM
02/29/08 02:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
Aye!

Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Aido] #133694
02/29/08 02:21 PM
02/29/08 02:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Quote

And I just ran the numbers and i can get a spanking new tiger for cheaper than the stealth and the blade with carbon mast.



This is for the other forum readers, just to provide (counter)evidence the claims :

http://www.proust-sailing.com/hobie-hobie-polyester-55/

Scroll down to bottom and find :

Hobie cat Tiger STX : 15.613 Euro's
Hobie FX-one extreme : 16.162 Euro's


Everybody can find Stealth F16 pricing here (still current) : www.stealthmarine.co.uk :

9650 GBP = 12.750 Euro's (incl. carbon mast)

Blade F16 prices are around 14.250 Euro's with Alu mast resulting in 1363 Euro difference that allows them to upgrade to a carbon mast and still be the below the quoted Tiger (basic setup) in cost. If My notes are correct then upgrading them with a Stealthmarine carbon mast will even have them under 15.000 Euro's; but you would have to do that upgrade yourself. See John Alani's comments about the Stealth carbon mast earlier in this thread.

Wouter

Last edited by Wouter; 02/29/08 02:28 PM.

Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: ] #133695
02/29/08 02:25 PM
02/29/08 02:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe


Spot on Mark !

That is exactly the reasons for my "F18" referals !

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Timbo] #133696
02/29/08 02:27 PM
02/29/08 02:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe


Hey Timbo,

The best part of your example ... :

Quote

There was a guy who Pimped his F18HT back a few years ago, maxed it out per the rules, rumor is he spent about $50,000 doing it. And it killed the class as nobody else wanted to spend that kind of money to play catch up. Is that what you want?



... is that during the first big race against other, more conventional, 18HT's HE LOST !

$50,000 in upgrades for a result that he could also have had with a plain $16.000 stock boat.

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: Wouter] #133697
02/29/08 02:31 PM
02/29/08 02:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293
Long Beach, California
John Williams Offline
Carpal Tunnel
John Williams  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293
Long Beach, California
It was a beautiful boat, though. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />


John Williams

- The harder you practice, the luckier you get -
Gary Player, pro golfer

After watching Lionel Messi play, I realize I need to sail harder.
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: GBR6] #133698
02/29/08 02:32 PM
02/29/08 02:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe


Quote

... my Capricorn was less than 6 months old and cost less than a brand new F16 would have when I bought it ...



Let me paraphrase that : you could buy a SECOND HAND Capricorn F18 for less then a BRAND NEW F16 !

And you think this says something because .... ?

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007 [Re: John Williams] #133699
02/29/08 02:35 PM
02/29/08 02:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Quote
It was a beautiful boat, though. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />



Ohh yeah !

Somebody with a carbon fetish would have an instantanious heart attack or an unsuppressable need to mate with it. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Wouter

Last edited by Wouter; 02/29/08 02:35 PM.

Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Page 4 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  Damon Linkous, phill, Rolf_Nilsen 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 499 guests, and 97 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,405
Posts267,056
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1