| Re: Rule 4.3
[Re: Hobie Dave]
#16807 03/05/03 09:32 AM 03/05/03 09:32 AM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 251 beaufort, sc dannyb9
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 251 beaufort, sc | in my imagination i can see a padeye mounted horizontally on each side of the mast with a cam, clam, or other cleat under each padeye. the padeye would serve to keep the cunningham line from blowing away from the cleat if it became uncleated, so the cunningham could be adjusted from either side. figure eight knots on each end of the cunningham line would prevent the line from ecaping. i guess a cunnungham grommet and reinforcement would have to be added to the sail.
marsh hawk
| | | Re: Rule 4.3
[Re: samevans]
#16809 03/05/03 12:49 PM 03/05/03 12:49 PM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 251 beaufort, sc dannyb9
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 251 beaufort, sc | if the downhaul line is tied to the loop on the gooseneck, run down to the cheek block (one part), back up to and through the loop(second part) and then down to the cleat (third part)and cleated, thats a 2:1 system? and where did the padeye go? is the rule written to describe the stock setup (no padeye on my mast) or written to describe what may be done legally to modify the stock system?
Last edited by dannyb9; 03/05/03 01:24 PM.
marsh hawk
| | | Re: purchase measurement
[Re: samevans]
#16811 03/06/03 08:35 AM 03/06/03 08:35 AM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 251 beaufort, sc dannyb9
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 251 beaufort, sc | in my 6 part main, cleated, each part carries 1/6 of the load, thus 6:1. so if in the downhaul situation as you described it, if there is a 30# load, what is the load on the part that goes down to the cheek block? what is the load on the part that goes back to the loop? and what is the load carried by the part that goes back down to the cleat and is cleated off? do the parts equally share the load? i'm just trying to understand.
marsh hawk
| | | Re: Rule 4.3
[Re: Hobie Dave]
#16812 03/09/03 07:58 AM 03/09/03 07:58 AM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 106 West Texas Hobie Dave OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 106 West Texas | I am certain that these two topics are rules changes. Last year, NAHCA sent out a survey about potential rule changes, including outhauls, downhauls, cunninghams, adjustable mast rotation, and spins. I wish they wouldn't have changed any of the rules.
I can see what Marsh Hawk is visualizing, and it would work. I am not sure that I want to add a reinforced grommet to my sail. I am hoping that most of the folks do not.
The outhaul rule is about the "clew" plate, which is at the outer end of the boom. The gooseneck is the "tack" of the sail.
I have never tried it, but I think that if one tacked the sail to the gooseneck, ran the bolt rope outside the track, added a sail slug to the clew that runs inside the track, the sail would work and be much more outhaul adjustment available.
I want to thank everyone for getting involved in this conversation. Perhaps, we can figure out what is the best approach to these rules.
David | | |
|
0 registered members (),
477
guests, and 38
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,062 Members8,150 | Most Online4,027 Jul 30th, 2025 | | |