| Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: F-18 5150]
#172902 03/26/09 06:05 AM 03/26/09 06:05 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | There were submisions from many manufactures but the Tiger was the only ISAF recognised class that fit the needs.
This shows how faulty the IOF selection proces is. Catamaran sailing is simply not the way the committee thinks it is. Afterall, the Tiger class itself pushed through many design changes over the years making their OD claim rather strenuous. Basically it is to only class that felt it necessary to hold up the facade of OD-ness while basically being a Formula based design in reality. How many Tigers are truly OD compliant ? No, the committee needs to look at cat sailing in the way it is (has become) a field where Formula principles have become to dominate. They should choose a design that reflects that. Not some two hulled dinghy class equivalent. Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: pepin]
#172922 03/26/09 10:12 AM 03/26/09 10:12 AM |
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 126 Southampton UK NacraKid
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 126 Southampton UK | The thing about cats is, we are a minority, fact, so we have less classes, there are many cat classes but few of them have a strong international following compared to dinghy classes. If you want to race an international two person cat, these days most people probably would go F18, (some people who have strong H16 fleets may go H16), if we compare this to the dinghy world there are many international two person dinghies- 49er, international 14, fireball, cherub, list goes on. Still we're too fast for the olympics. | | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: Jake]
#172929 03/26/09 10:43 AM 03/26/09 10:43 AM |
Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL waterbug_wpb
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL | [quote=JakeMakes me wonder if we're actually the minority we are presumed to be... [/quote]
Since most aren't affiliated with the various organizing authorities, would that make us "illegal immigrants"?
Jay
| | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: SurfCityRacing]
#172943 03/26/09 12:24 PM 03/26/09 12:24 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD Mark Schneider
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD | And just to throw another aspect into the hat: We had 98 Hobie Tigers sailing at the Tiger Worlds here in Santa Barbara in'05. GREAT but the biggest North American Tiger regatta in 08 was the NA's with 12 boats and 35 or so Class Members. The market is speaking pretty clearly.... OD is not winning the day in the USA. (Source Nahca standings) I think this fact makes Wouter's point. The One Design racing model is dying. (not that the Hobie Tiger as a boat is dying) ISAF want's a "level" playing field for the olympics.. They are run by committee and the politics of each country wanting an advantage. What you get is a muddled mess which can't examine reality and see a proper way forward. They have ruined the Tornado Class over the years... Now they have pushed it to be the One Design Tornado Class solely for the Olympics. IMO... let ISAF continue to kill the Tornado class with love and keep it as the Olympic boat for the 50 teams that are racing world wide.. Why drive the Tiger or the F18 class in the same state? Catamarans organizations should sell ISAF on a two tier model. The notion is that the F18 class is the perfect entry to high level training platform for ultimately stepping up to the Tornado. It's the same crew weight and skill set PLUS it's accessible to the world's sailors.
Last edited by Mark Schneider; 03/26/09 12:25 PM.
crac.sailregattas.com
| | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: F-18 5150]
#173036 03/27/09 05:14 AM 03/27/09 05:14 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia Tornado_ALIVE
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia | The Olympic selection (if returned to medal competion) has to be an internationally recognised class. Must also meet the ISAF standards for world wide and national championships. The new "One Design" Tornado , and Hobie Tiger F-18 are the final two boats on the list. The Tornado was not a recognised International Class when it was selected for the Olympics. It was designed for the Olympics as was the 49er. Thye both gained International status later on down the track. I beleive the RSX is likewise. It would be interesting to see how many Olympic classes were actually Internationaly recognised before selection. The Laser is one of them off course. Were any of the others???? | | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: Tom Korz]
#173059 03/27/09 11:49 AM 03/27/09 11:49 AM |
Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 749 Santa Cruz, CA SurfCityRacing
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 749 Santa Cruz, CA | Wasn't that the carnage 30knot year?
Yep!!! On the way to the gate in the last "windiest" race of the day. We were a lil overstood and took the chute down. It was pretty nuts. We pulled a bunch of you guys out of the water that's for sure. J | | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: Mark Schneider]
#173071 03/27/09 01:01 PM 03/27/09 01:01 PM |
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,969 brucat
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969 | GREAT but the biggest North American Tiger regatta in 08 was the NA's with 12 boats and 35 or so Class Members. The market is speaking pretty clearly.... OD is not winning the day in the USA. (Source Nahca standings)
Congratulations, you found a limited piece of data to support the conclusion you wanted to draw... One design is second to WHAT, exactly? The F18 situation is the US is somewhat unique. Tiger sailors, given the chance to do a Tiger NAs or a F18 NAs seem to be going to the larger event (this has been discussed at length here). That in NO WAY means ALL OD cat sailing is slipping to open classes. Hobie 16s and A-Cats, at a minimum, have larger NAs than any "open" class events. Further, at points regattas, H16s, A-Cats and Tigers tend to have larger classes than any open fleets. Mike | | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: brucat]
#173078 03/27/09 02:05 PM 03/27/09 02:05 PM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... scooby_simon Hull Flying, Snow Sliding.... |
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... | GREAT but the biggest North American Tiger regatta in 08 was the NA's with 12 boats and 35 or so Class Members. The market is speaking pretty clearly.... OD is not winning the day in the USA. (Source Nahca standings)
Congratulations, you found a limited piece of data to support the conclusion you wanted to draw... One design is second to WHAT, exactly? The F18 situation is the US is somewhat unique. Tiger sailors, given the chance to do a Tiger NAs or a F18 NAs seem to be going to the larger event (this has been discussed at length here). That in NO WAY means ALL OD cat sailing is slipping to open classes. Hobie 16s and A-Cats, at a minimum, have larger NAs than any "open" class events. Further, at points regattas, H16s, A-Cats and Tigers tend to have larger classes than any open fleets. Mike Erm, I think you will find that the A class is an "open" class; you could not call an A class a OD boat.
F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD I also talk sport here | | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: brucat]
#173082 03/27/09 02:45 PM 03/27/09 02:45 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD Mark Schneider
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD | GREAT but the biggest North American Tiger regatta in 08 was the NA's with 12 boats and 35 or so Class Members. The market is speaking pretty clearly.... OD is not winning the day in the USA. (Source Nahca standings)
Congratulations, you found a limited piece of data to support the conclusion you wanted to draw... One design is second to WHAT, exactly? The F18 situation is the US is somewhat unique. Tiger sailors, given the chance to do a Tiger NAs or a F18 NAs seem to be going to the larger event (this has been discussed at length here). That in NO WAY means ALL OD cat sailing is slipping to open classes. Hobie 16s and A-Cats, at a minimum, have larger NAs than any "open" class events. Further, at points regattas, H16s, A-Cats and Tigers tend to have larger classes than any open fleets. Mike Did you read the thread? Original Post. WOW... look at the F18 turnout... A Formula Class! the Sailing World should take notice with respect to Olympics. Wouter expanded on the idea... ISAF is looking backward. It's a mistake... The F18 is not one design... it's formula and the majority of Tiger sailors have updated their boat to compete... OH... the Class rules changed yearly to keep these developments OD class legal. ISAF should drop the OD mania and pick a formulae class. Mark,wrote.. The OD focus of F18 sailors is going...going and almost gone. . the Hobie Tiger ONE DESIGN CLASS... started with 100 boats in the US... and has declined to a dozen boats over several years despite the growth of the F18 class and the continual rule changes to keep up with F18 changes. My point is the USA F18 sailors have bought the formulae concept (like the rest of the world) ... not the frozen in time one design concept. (FYI... the A class is another Formula Class). This data makes wouter's point that the Formulae classes are replacing OD classes embeded within them. This debate is about F18's. My statement does not infer or paint with a broad brush the Hobie 16 class for instance.. (err.. what point regattas are the A class invited to?) I disagree with Wouter that they should pick a formula class for the Olympics... I also disagree that they should pick the OD Tiger Class. It destroys a sailboat racing class. Instead I proposed a two tier path... F18 stays the way it is... (above ISAF BS politics and the pressures.) The Formula class is an entry point for new racers and a high level training platform world wide. Teams can move up to Olympic ISAF grade one events on the One Design Tornado for Olympics. SteveM and NAcaraKid agree with my point and add a junior boat as well. Nobody is talking about OPEN CLASS RACING IN THIS THREAD...Nobody is saying ALL OD will go the way of the dodo bird. You toss out a huge red herring. Tiger sailors racing in the F18 class is not OD sailors slipping to the dreaded Open class. Open class racing addresses a different problem. IMO If you are not getting 10 boats in your formulae or OD class.. Open class racing probably grows the pool of sailors in the long run. (Seems to work well where catamaran racing is far more popular but hey... why should we pay attention) But this is a different thread. Now... the NAHCA debate of what should they do with TWO F18 class boats (Tiger and Wildcat) is a giggle and relevant to the F18 Class and possible Olympic selection. For years.. the F18 sailors have requested NAHCA drop the restriction that the OA not allow an F18 class. Now you have two Hobie F18 designs that will race each other in the rest of the world... but if the OD mania rules... not in a Hobie regatta.... It's a sad giggle what such rigidity has wrought. Hobie has to pretend that the Tiger OD model is going great guns world wide for the Olympic ISAF pitch... Obviously the USA scene is a little out of tune with this song ... BUT... it's far better then the US Tornado racing scene. It's an ISAF battle and will be decided in the fall. (By the way... have they asked the class if the Tiger want's to become Olympic?) I predict that once the IOC decides if sailing gets more slots and ISAF gives them to catamarans and then ISAF chooses a OD between the ... OD Tiger or OD Tornado the politics will change. If the Tiger is not picked.... the Tiger OD class will gracefully fold into the F18 world. The NA scene will have a chance to serve the sailors and not the politics/ business model of dealers. So.... New thread if you are up for it.. ... Will the NAHCA continue to prevent their member club OA's from running F18 OD events or other formula one design events? ... (I won't even ask about serving the Hobie dead boats in an open class race)
crac.sailregattas.com
| | | Re: F18 Worlds - a statement of multihull strength
[Re: Mark Schneider]
#173083 03/27/09 03:00 PM 03/27/09 03:00 PM |
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,969 brucat
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969 | Apologies, It's been a long week. I thought you were talking about OD in general, not just F18.
Personally, I see F18 and A-class as one-design for fleet racing. I know, that's not the correct definition, but if you're racing boat-for-boat without handicapping, that's close enough for me.
Yes, the rules of these classes evolve, but that's the price to pay if you want to race those boats. I don't think anyone goes into it not knowing that (or, they shouldn't unless they've been living under a rock). SMOD is a different animal, which I personally prefer, but everyone has a right to their choice.
BUT, that's not to say I agree that Hobie class regattas should be open to non-Hobie F18s. That has more to do with the support and purpose of the HCA and HCC.
Mike | | |
|
0 registered members (),
838
guests, and 50
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |