David Hubbard is working for Ellison, Duncan MacLane for Bertarelli. Guess what...
Ohh YEaahhhh!!!
Finally, America's Cup using cutting edge technology. We need to see lifting foils...
My bet; that will never happen. We will see foils that will provide some lift but nothing that will clear the boat from the water. While lifting foils work on super lightweight and low aero-drag moths, on anything of any size lifting foils have not yet proven to get to weather efficiently enough to be an advantage around a technical course. They tend to be more of a "drag" upwind as the boat can't get airborne at high angles of attack and turn out to be a source for a lot of slowness. Yes, Hydroptere absolutely rocks, but she doesn't go to weather well at all...all video you see of her is a very deep beam reach since she generates such incredible apparent wind.
I am sure Doug Lord wont agree with your statement. LOL
David Hubbard is working for Ellison, Duncan MacLane for Bertarelli. Guess what...
Ohh YEaahhhh!!!
Finally, America's Cup using cutting edge technology. We need to see lifting foils...
My bet; that will never happen. We will see foils that will provide some lift but nothing that will clear the boat from the water. While lifting foils work on super lightweight and low aero-drag moths, on anything of any size lifting foils have not yet proven to get to weather efficiently enough to be an advantage around a technical course. They tend to be more of a "drag" upwind as the boat can't get airborne at high angles of attack and turn out to be a source for a lot of slowness. Yes, Hydroptere absolutely rocks, but she doesn't go to weather well at all...all video you see of her is a very deep beam reach since she generates such incredible apparent wind.
I am sure {censored} wont agree with your statement. LOL
Careful, the mere mention of that name may unleash his furry on this forum.
The comments about crew safety if one goes over was pretty poignant.
How do you fall roughly 9 stories 'safely'? Bungee?
I like the VX 40 because of the mesh trampoline allowing crew to hold on if they go over. Perhaps something like this will be used on the mega-monster-giant boats?
America's Cup using cutting edge technology. We need to see lifting foils...
My bet; that will never happen.
Big boats tend to be faster than small boats, so the big cats should become foilborne in less wind than Moths - provided taht their total density (total boat weight/total boat volume) is lower than that of a Moth. For comparison, the total density of an ORMA Open 60 is more or less the same as styrofoam.
If the venue would be in an area of strong winds, foils would certainly be used for stability and very likely for 100% foilborne sailing downwind. Banana foils to assist stability could be seen in BMW Oracle since it saw daylight.
On the other hand, if the race will be in a light wind area - as Alinghi's design seems to indicate - the banana foils won't be necessary and 100% foilborne downwind sailing will be unlikely.
It is a very long way from a 11 foot Moth to a 90 foot Multicupper. Extrapolating any data or experience from the moth to a Dogzilla's is fantasy.
To give an example; the 90 ft dogzilla's will not even encounter significant form drag all the way up to 14.6 knots; a speed at which the Moth sailors will be crying with exitement. Afterall their cross-over point is already to be found at 5.1 knots.
The dogzilla's are expected to go close to 30 knots and that means a wing loading that is at least 4 times that of a 15 knot Moth. All well outside the scope of extrapolation.
If foiling was such a magic trick then the last C-class challenge would not have seen the full foiling version being amputated with a grinder.
Moths were VERY limited in the waterline length and maximal attainable power (due to limited width) and there foiling allowed for a significant jump in performance (about 20%); however in the Australian portsmouth rating they are still on a par with the Hobie 16.
Another lesson in the difference in relative performance compared to absolute performance.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
David Hubbard is working for Ellison, Duncan MacLane for Bertarelli. Guess what...
Ohh YEaahhhh!!!
Finally, America's Cup using cutting edge technology. We need to see lifting foils...
My bet; that will never happen. We will see foils that will provide some lift but nothing that will clear the boat from the water. While lifting foils work on super lightweight and low aero-drag moths, on anything of any size lifting foils have not yet proven to get to weather efficiently enough to be an advantage around a technical course. They tend to be more of a "drag" upwind as the boat can't get airborne at high angles of attack and turn out to be a source for a lot of slowness. Yes, Hydroptere absolutely rocks, but she doesn't go to weather well at all...all video you see of her is a very deep beam reach since she generates such incredible apparent wind.
I think that some of the work done with the SYZ foiler could come into play here. I do not think it will, but they sail in the same series of races the EB does and have connections to Alinghi. Time will tell though. I think it would be a huge project to take what SYZ has learned over all their trial phases and apply it to a catamaran this size.
From the horses mouth. "In fact Vrolijk isn’t convinced foilers are any faster and they did the research. In the early stages they employed designer Sebastien Schmidt to do a study on what it would take to make Bertarelli's 41ft cat, Le Black, foil and they also had a meeting with the L’Hydroptere team who were keen for them to build a bit inshore version of their foiler tri. According to Vrolijk their VPP has shown the foilers to be occasionally as fast, but no faster than their cat with its long and exceeding fine hulls.
“This system is not easy to put on two foils, so you have to put it on more foils and then you add it up and it doesn’t work. It flies, but it is not fast! Plus all the problems with controlling the foils. Maybe in 10 years….”
...If foiling was such a magic trick then the last C-class challenge would not have seen the full foiling version being amputated with a grinder.
Moths were VERY limited in the waterline length and maximal attainable power (due to limited width) and there foiling allowed for a significant jump in performance (about 20%)...
Another lesson in the difference in relative performance compared to absolute performance.
Wouter,
The C Class has limited dimensions and limited sail area, while the current AC boats have limited dimensions and unlimited sail area. This contributes to make extrapolation unreasonable. The moth is indeed a special case, also unreasonable to extrapolate.
I think the 90ft X 90ft platform could benefit from foils that increase stability (Bruce foils), allowing for more sail area - which is unlimited - to be carried in that same platform.
Alinghi ressearched hydrofoil configurations very seriously, including that of my boat, while everyone knows that BMW Oracle already used banana foils. I suggest we wait for a while before discarding foils.
I'm on record for several years now as believing in bruce foils in partial lift uses and not believing in full foiling for larger craft that race normal courses.
So we agree actually.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands