Announcements
New Discussions
Polar Diagrams for beach catamarans?
by TexasTuma. 07/01/25 04:16 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Portsmouth Ratings - take them at face value? #19042
04/29/03 02:09 PM
04/29/03 02:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 215
Durham, North Carolina
jwrobie Offline OP
enthusiast
jwrobie  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 215
Durham, North Carolina
Suppose I have two boats whose Portsmouth ratings are very similar:

Hobie 17 (1up)
H17 74.2 78.5 76.3 73.9 69.7
Isotope (Sloop, 1up)
ISTP 74.2 78.9 74.3 73.8 68.1

Can I safely assume that these boats are equally fast?

Jonathan

-- Have You Seen This? --
Re: Portsmouth Ratings - take them at face value? [Re: jwrobie] #19043
04/29/03 02:13 PM
04/29/03 02:13 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114
BANNED
MauganN20 Offline
Carpal Tunnel
MauganN20  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114
BANNED
Depends on the sailor

I know that I was outrunning Isotopes on Jordan even when my centerboard was dangling off the side of my starboard hull.

Re: Portsmouth Ratings - take them at face value? [Re: MauganN20] #19044
04/29/03 02:50 PM
04/29/03 02:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 215
Durham, North Carolina
jwrobie Offline OP
enthusiast
jwrobie  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 215
Durham, North Carolina
But if you were to sail an Isotope, then the Hobie 17 on the same course, could I assume you would be about equally fast based on these ratings?

Jonathan

Re: Portsmouth Ratings - take them at face value? [Re: jwrobie] #19045
04/29/03 02:54 PM
04/29/03 02:54 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114
BANNED
MauganN20 Offline
Carpal Tunnel
MauganN20  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114
BANNED
If I knew how to properly sail an isotope, then yes, that would be a fair assumption.

In this particular case, in lighter winds, an isotope would fly by a H17 just because its so light. In heavier winds, the story changes a bit. Also, throw in some chop, waves, and other environmental factors and you'll begin to see the differences arise.

Re: Portsmouth Ratings - take them at face value? [Re: MauganN20] #19046
04/29/03 08:58 PM
04/29/03 08:58 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 59
Sandy Hook, NJ Fleet 250
jonr Offline
journeyman
jonr  Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 59
Sandy Hook, NJ Fleet 250
If the Portsmouth Rating number is lower, the boat is faster if all other condition are the same (skipper with same ability and so on). The H17 is slower compared to the Isotope in higher wind speeds. If we are to believe the numbers.

Re: Portsmouth Ratings - take them at face value? [Re: jonr] #19047
04/29/03 09:26 PM
04/29/03 09:26 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114
BANNED
MauganN20 Offline
Carpal Tunnel
MauganN20  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,114
BANNED
Eh, I can tell you right now that those numbers aren't right if thats the case.



Moderated by  Damon Linkous 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 3,695 guests, and 114 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,406
Posts267,062
Members8,150
Most Online4,027
1 hour ago
--Advertisement--
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1