Announcements
New Discussions
Best spinnaker halyard line material?
by '81 Hobie 16 Lac Leman. 03/31/24 10:31 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Timbo] #196237
11/14/09 02:23 AM
11/14/09 02:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Originally Posted by Timbo
Originally Posted by macca
Originally Posted by Timbo
It's still about who is driving, as it should be, not about what boat they happen to be on today.

You could put the top 3 at the GC today on any of the F16's and they would still be the top 3 to finish.

People get way too hung up on the weight and think they can buy speed. You still have to sail it well if you want to win and a couple kilos is not going to have any effect on that.


Tim,



You might like to ask the top 3 if they think the extra 20kg on the Vipers makes the boat any less exciting...

You should also ask those top 3 if they think the racing would be any better if the boats were all 107kg?


Macca, all I need to ask them is if they want the minimum wt. raised and I'm pretty sure they will say, "Why?". Until I hear a good reason, I'm not inclined to vote in favor of it. When did you join the class anyway?

If you are a member, you can vote yes, after you write up a resolution and present it. And then all the lighter Taipan guys will be pissed.


Tim, Ask the top 3 boats at the GC and I think you will be suprised at their answer...


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
--Advertisement--
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: macca] #196239
11/14/09 02:48 AM
11/14/09 02:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
scooby_simon Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
scooby_simon  Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
Originally Posted by macca
Originally Posted by Timbo
Originally Posted by macca
Originally Posted by Timbo
It's still about who is driving, as it should be, not about what boat they happen to be on today.

You could put the top 3 at the GC today on any of the F16's and they would still be the top 3 to finish.

People get way too hung up on the weight and think they can buy speed. You still have to sail it well if you want to win and a couple kilos is not going to have any effect on that.


Tim,



You might like to ask the top 3 if they think the extra 20kg on the Vipers makes the boat any less exciting...

You should also ask those top 3 if they think the racing would be any better if the boats were all 107kg?


Macca, all I need to ask them is if they want the minimum wt. raised and I'm pretty sure they will say, "Why?". Until I hear a good reason, I'm not inclined to vote in favor of it. When did you join the class anyway?

If you are a member, you can vote yes, after you write up a resolution and present it. And then all the lighter Taipan guys will be pissed.


Tim, Ask the top 3 boats at the GC and I think you will be suprised at their answer...


You need more than 3 votres to change the class rules.

As Rolf states above; we have a clearly defined route to changing the class rules.



F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD

I also talk sport here
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #196241
11/14/09 03:30 AM
11/14/09 03:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Originally Posted by Rolf_Nilsen
The min. weight came from experience and setting a goal, as pointed out several times in other threads.

HJS, I dont know who you are, and I would like to know. Please give us a presentation.

We had a nasty and provoking persona under the "nom du guerre" of Sue here last year. Since then strangers with controversial opinions on our class rules and absolutely no buy-in or connection to the class are pointed in direction of the membership entry form and the proper way to instigate changes in the class rules. You are certainly free to discuss F16s, sailing etc. but when you begin to argument for a change in our class rules repeatedly please become a member and set about changes the proper way.

Become a member here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/60/63/lang,en/

You find the class rules here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/19/34/lang,en/

Sorry if you find this rude, but there are valid historical reasons for asking for presentation.


Rolf, I don't know who HJS is and have had no contct with them.

However: if you read the first post in this thread, you will see that HJS started by promotng the class, and now you return the favor by attacking their credibility! Nice way to encorage participation!!

just because people dont agree with the out of whack rules the class has does't mean they are trying to destroy the class!

And by the way, "Sue" is now the proud owner of a Viper...


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: scooby_simon] #196242
11/14/09 03:35 AM
11/14/09 03:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Originally Posted by scooby_simon
Originally Posted by macca
Originally Posted by Timbo
Originally Posted by macca
Originally Posted by Timbo
It's still about who is driving, as it should be, not about what boat they happen to be on today.

You could put the top 3 at the GC today on any of the F16's and they would still be the top 3 to finish.

People get way too hung up on the weight and think they can buy speed. You still have to sail it well if you want to win and a couple kilos is not going to have any effect on that.


Tim,



You might like to ask the top 3 if they think the extra 20kg on the Vipers makes the boat any less exciting...

You should also ask those top 3 if they think the racing would be any better if the boats were all 107kg?


Macca, all I need to ask them is if they want the minimum wt. raised and I'm pretty sure they will say, "Why?". Until I hear a good reason, I'm not inclined to vote in favor of it. When did you join the class anyway?

If you are a member, you can vote yes, after you write up a resolution and present it. And then all the lighter Taipan guys will be pissed.


Tim, Ask the top 3 boats at the GC and I think you will be suprised at their answer...


You need more than 3 votres to change the class rules.

As Rolf states above; we have a clearly defined route to changing the class rules.



Simon,

Tim was making an assumption about the top 3 teams opinion on the issue of class min weight, I was simply requsting that he actually ask hem for their thoughts and post the answers on here.

Whist we wait for those answers, maybe you could confirm what your carbon F16 weighs?


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Wouter] #196243
11/14/09 04:22 AM
11/14/09 04:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 10
France
S
sailfast Offline
stranger
sailfast  Offline
stranger
S

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 10
France
Hi Wouter,

I really don't want to have a polemic discussion, or a comparaison of this one is better, this one is heavyer ...there's no interest for that.
Like i'm professional, after I take volontary exemple on AHPC boats i sell, for nobody outside could be feel ofensed.


there's some facts :

A Taipan haven't be devellop for Spi.
Add a spi and few years of experiences on cat design : the shape, volume and stifness of hulls and platform need to be increase.
Viper was developed on these bases.
Like they haven't the same specifications at the begining, a Taipan and a Viper couldn't made the same weight with similar build, at the end it's evident.
So for made a Viper at the weight of Taipan, Viper should be really more expensive than Taipan with an more high tech build.
That's all, there's no polemic around that.

The 2 boats are agree with F16 rules, and sail together in F16

The 2 boats like "production boat" haven't the same rating because their data are differents.
A rating is calculate only on data, there's no adjustement if it's an old or new design, a bad or a very good design ...
so calculator said Viper is slower than Taipan.

All that for me is correct, and need no change.


In A class, build a 75 kg boat with glass hull is possible, no problem, i had an AJ under 75 kg.
Why racer buy all carbon hulls ?

In F18 180 kg is a confortable weight.
It was easy in the past to have boat at 180 kg or a little under.
with new design ...some of them have difficulties for stay at 180 kg, at world boat with weight corrector isn't a lot.
Why ?


After for give some numbers ...

(sorry if power ratio isn't the good term in English but i think you'll understand)

power ratio of an
A class is 340 kg/m
F16 1-up (103 kg) 395 kg/m
Viper 1-up 415 kg/m
F16 2-up (107 kg) 630 kg/m
Viper 2-up (130 kg) 650 kg/m
F18 750 kg/m
Tornado 800 kg/m

Take an A class like references

for made an F16-1 up
power ration increase of 16 % and weight of 37% for a 103 kg boat.

for made an F16 - 2up
you increase power ratio of more of 80 %
but you increase weight of only 43 % for a 107 kg boat. (73% for a 130 kg boat).


Now take an F18 like references

for made an F16 - 2up
you decrease power ratio of only 16 %
but you decrease weight of 41 % for a 107 kg boat, (28 % for a 130 kg boat).

for made an F16-1 up
power ration decrease of 45 % and weight of 43% for a 103 kg boat.


volontary i don't want give my conclusion about ..



My view is only a 25 or 30 K€ boat full carbon, and full victory should accept with smile by the class ?

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: sailfast] #196244
11/14/09 04:32 AM
11/14/09 04:32 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
Stewart Offline
old hand
Stewart  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
In my experience a fully carbon hull over a fully glass hull is less than 20% in material costs.. This is with the equivalent layup..


Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Stewart] #196245
11/14/09 04:49 AM
11/14/09 04:49 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 10
France
S
sailfast Offline
stranger
sailfast  Offline
stranger
S

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 10
France
I haven't the same price base, but it's not a problem.
speak only of hulls is like look by keyhole.
generaly on a cat, hulls are only 40 ~ 50 % of global weight.


Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: sailfast] #196246
11/14/09 04:56 AM
11/14/09 04:56 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
Stewart Offline
old hand
Stewart  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
The Tiapan was originally designed for a kite..
Should be in the Tiapan's history if you care to check up.. But was dropped early in the development.. Being that as it is..

I also do not believe the Viper has any greater build technology in the build than a 80s built skiff.. I also disagree with thinking that a ply hull is any less of a hull than a composite. Apart from the easy of complex curves than be ply hull can be exceptional.

So AHPC wants a bigger and heavier hull *shrugs* so? My only comment is its but its not a class killer.

In my opinion the F18 is way way overweight.. *shrugs* But that is the classes choice.. The only reference one should make to them in reference to the F16 is their rating.

Please remember the weights were calculated to keep the F16 solo and F16 cat on the same benchmark.. Nothing needs changing imho.

Still not sure why one needs to spend that much to make a fully carbon F16..

now I just need time and less traveling so I can get back on the water...

Last edited by Stewart; 11/14/09 04:58 AM.
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Stewart] #196248
11/14/09 06:23 AM
11/14/09 06:23 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline

Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Macca,

stop making yourself look like a clown. Returning to this Don Quixote quest with the min weight and trying to be smart playing word games. It is not going to happen. If you want to try raising min weight, here is the info you need:

Become a member here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/60/63/lang,en/

You find the class rules here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/19/34/lang,en/

Until you do it the proper way, leave the subject alone or get out of here.

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #196249
11/14/09 06:29 AM
11/14/09 06:29 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Rolf,

I am a paid member of the F16 class.

I have 2 Questions:-

1. What do the top 3 teams at the GC think about the min weight issue?

2. What does Simon's all carbon, super cheap F16 weigh?

No word games, just simple questions that can be answered quite easily.



________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: macca] #196250
11/14/09 06:35 AM
11/14/09 06:35 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline

Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
According to the class records, you are not a paid up class member (and I just checked).
You are not an F16 owner either as far as I know. You have no stakes in the class, so:


Stop making yourself look like a clown. Returning to this Don Quixote quest with the min weight and trying to be smart playing word games. It is not going to happen. If you want to try raising min weight, here is the info you need:

Become a member here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/60/63/lang,en/

You find the class rules here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/19/34/lang,en/

Until you do it the proper way, leave the subject alone or get out of here.

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: macca] #196251
11/14/09 06:43 AM
11/14/09 06:43 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
P
phill Offline

veteran
phill  Offline

veteran
P

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
Macca,
I have been keeping the books for the past 2 years and you
ARE NOT a paid up member of the class.


I know that the voices in my head aint real,
but they have some pretty good ideas.
There is no such thing as a quick fix and I've never had free lunch!

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #196252
11/14/09 06:44 AM
11/14/09 06:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Maybe the class finances are slow too....

Here is the Paypal Unique Transaction ID: #7MR30369MP184463M

Oh, and I still own a Maricat 4.3, which I believe is F16 compliant....

Last edited by macca; 11/14/09 06:47 AM.

________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #196253
11/14/09 06:45 AM
11/14/09 06:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539
taipanfc Offline
addict
taipanfc  Offline
addict

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539
HJS, her name is Helen. Only guessing, but she is "Helen Goodall". I am sure she can confirm if she is that Helen or another Helen.

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: taipanfc] #196254
11/14/09 06:49 AM
11/14/09 06:49 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Originally Posted by taipanfc
HJS, her name is Helen. Only guessing, but she is "Helen Goodall". I am sure she can confirm if she is that Helen or another Helen.


Dude!! check the Avatar!! HJS is a 2 year old child smile


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: macca] #196255
11/14/09 06:50 AM
11/14/09 06:50 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539
taipanfc Offline
addict
taipanfc  Offline
addict

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539
Hey, was only guessing. Well kids these days certainly grow up fast if already on the net and discussing F16 issues.

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: taipanfc] #196256
11/14/09 06:52 AM
11/14/09 06:52 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Very grown up issues too!


________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: macca] #196257
11/14/09 07:01 AM
11/14/09 07:01 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Rolf_Nilsen Offline

Carpal Tunnel
Rolf_Nilsen  Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451
West coast of Norway
Originally Posted by macca
Maybe the class finances are slow too....

Here is the Paypal Unique Transaction ID: #7MR30369MP184463M

Oh, and I still own a Maricat 4.3, which I believe is F16 compliant....


I built the software behind the members entry form so I know you had not applied and where not a paid up member when you said so. Phill would know about your application and payment before you could press "Submit" on your post here.
The Maricat fails to qualify as an F16. Dont play childrens games with adults and more word games.

If you eventually become a member, go to the members forum on: http://www.formula16.net/forum/ and present your arguments there. To get a vote on the changes you want you also have to submit a proposal to the GC. You dont stand a chance to get the change through tough. Read up on the class rules and the constitution before you waste more of your time on this quixotic foolery.

Until then:

Stop making yourself look like a clown. Returning to this Don Quixote quest with the min weight and trying to be smart playing word games. It is not going to happen. If you want to try raising min weight, here is the info you need:

Become a member here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/60/63/lang,en/

You find the class rules here: http://www.formula16.net/content/view/19/34/lang,en/

Until you do it the proper way, leave the subject alone or get out of here.

Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: Rolf_Nilsen] #196258
11/14/09 07:06 AM
11/14/09 07:06 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
macca Offline
old hand
macca  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Australia
Rolf,

I filled in the form and paid well before I posted that I was a member. So I think you will find there is an error on the back end...

If you like, I can email the screen shot directly to your email (gmail) address that is given as the paypal account contact?




________________________
http://aus300.blogspot.com
Re: Another F16 Blast. .. Very Well Done ! [Re: macca] #196259
11/14/09 07:07 AM
11/14/09 07:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 221
Netherlands
Hans_Ned_111 Offline
enthusiast
Hans_Ned_111  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 221
Netherlands
This is a very sad thread and so uselessbut maybe the following can be a solution.
Why not go to the F18 forum and start a weight thread overthere why they have a minimum weight rule in there class rules or maybe on the main forum start a weight thread on the minimum weight rule in A-class and start talking why not raise the weight in these classes.

But all fool things in a row , minimum weight is a rule in the class rules and so be it and i do not see any reason to come back on it over and over again.


Best regards,

Hans Klok

Web : http://www.catamaranparts.nl
Blog : http://catamaranparts.blogspot.nl
Mail : info@catamaranparts.nl

Raptor F16 and A-class builder
Page 5 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11

Moderated by  Damon Linkous, phill, Rolf_Nilsen 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 661 guests, and 110 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,405
Posts267,056
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1