| Re: Titanium?
[Re: Karl_Brogger]
#206094 03/19/10 01:55 AM 03/19/10 01:55 AM |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 571 Hamburg Smiths_Cat
addict
|
addict
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 571 Hamburg | Titanium has been all the rage with motorcycles and quads, why don't we see more of it in sailing other than some hardware? The carbon vs aluminum mast thing got me thinking of it. I'd think there'd be benifits to using it for anywhere we're currently using aluminum, or stainless steel. Except maybe the masts, I think its extremely stiff, but I don't know that for sure.
I bought a full titanium exhaust for a race quad once, almost $900, but I think the complete system weighed something along the lines of a couple of pounds including the silencer. Simple answer: because the load cases are totally different. Motorcyle is a frame. Material is selected by strength to weight ratio, good for Titanium, CFRP, even some steel alloys (which are as expensisve than as Titanium...) Sailing mast is a aeroshape, it is build for stiffness and buckling, hence the material must have good stiffness to weight properties. Hence it would be alu or better CFRP (sometimes wood would be even better; not for usual cat mast, however). Cheers, Klaus | | | Re: Titanium?
[Re: Karl_Brogger]
#206165 03/19/10 03:55 PM 03/19/10 03:55 PM |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 571 Hamburg Smiths_Cat
addict
|
addict
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 571 Hamburg | What about heavy and larger items like beams, or rudder stocks as well? Again a beam is driven by stiffness, so better take alu or even better CFRP. Rudderstock, hm never thought about it. The rudder head, where the rudder pivot is fixed, could be made of titanium space frame, the bolts and so on as well. But the weight saving is small. Actually i don't know about motorcycles, but on bicycles, Titanium was more for fashion than weight/stiffness, at the end CFRP was lighter, but Titanium was rare, a statement of style like a exclusive watch, mystic soviet technology... | | | Re: Titanium?
[Re: Stewart]
#206189 03/20/10 03:07 AM 03/20/10 03:07 AM |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 571 Hamburg Smiths_Cat
addict
|
addict
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 571 Hamburg | From its structural properties a magnesium beam would be quite good, however magnesium is very sensitive to corrosion, especially in salty environment. In theory beryllium has excellent properties, but it is difficult to handle, it may burn, when milled and it is higly toxic. In aviation the most promissing metallic material is alumium-lithium alloy, because of its low density, and the hybrid alumium glass fibre (fibre metal laminate). However environment and load cases are different to what we see on beach cats.
At the end of the day you need only focus on alu, glass, carbon and wood as materials for small cats, without missing any significant benefit. You can improve the design much more by good engineering, rather by material choice (e.g. not a constant layer setup for the whole hull). You can have a huge benefit by swithching from polyester to epoxy. However exotic materials are good for marketing. | | | Re: Titanium?
[Re: Smiths_Cat]
#206455 03/23/10 08:19 PM 03/23/10 08:19 PM |
Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 932 Solomon's Island, MD samc99us
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 932 Solomon's Island, MD | The areas where I think titanium should be seriously considered are the places where stainless steel is currently used. The most common is the rudder system. If titanium gudgeons and rudder stocks were available, many people would switch to avoid failures in these areas. Of course, you may rip the entire transom off instead of breaking a $15 gudgeon or pintail, but that is a risk some are willing to take...
Last edited by samc99us; 03/23/10 08:19 PM.
Scorpion F18
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
300
guests, and 34
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,062 Members8,150 | Most Online4,027 Jul 30th, 2025 | | |