| Re: hobie vs narca warranty
[Re: banannahead]
#23840 09/02/03 11:01 PM 09/02/03 11:01 PM |
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 20 Nacra546
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 20 | Are boarded boats COMPLETELY out of the question? The performance difference between the two is quite noticeable (IMHO).
Nacra 6.0NA to kill myself quickly and a Johnson 18 to do it a little slower.
| | | Re: hobie vs narca warranty
[Re: Cookie Monster]
#23846 09/04/03 02:00 PM 09/04/03 02:00 PM |
Joined: May 2002 Posts: 1,037 Central California ejpoulsen
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,037 Central California | And if the Nacra 5.7 points as well as the 5.0, it's nuthin' to be ashamed of...
Eric Poulsen A-class USA 203 Ultimate 20 Central California
| | | Re: hobie vs narca warranty
[Re: banannahead]
#23848 09/04/03 11:08 PM 09/04/03 11:08 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | Some may argue (and probably justifiably) that a boomless sail plan is not quite as quick as one with a boom. However, there are some catamarans that are well known performers that are boomless....the Nacra 6.0NA for example (I'm pretty biased). Not having a boom might be a slight performance disadvantage but you loose a lot of potential for brain damage.
Jake Kohl | | |
|
0 registered members (),
483
guests, and 78
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,056 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |