| Interesting but one thing I don't understand ....
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#26837 12/11/03 03:26 PM 12/11/03 03:26 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | What I don't understand is the following :
you first state
>>(we were) closly followed by the sloop Tornado and on the upwind to the finish were overtaken to windward by the (sloop) T and finished second.
And than you state
>>Upwind we had a slight edge in hight and speed when we were powered up but in the lulls, suffered.
So did you or did you not have an overall edge when going upwind. If so how can you be overtaken to windward by a sloop rig ? If not then how much of an edge did you momenterally ? Did you loose so too much time on the tacks ? Or did you loose more during the lulls than you gained in the gusts ? What do you call powered up ? Do you have any idea why you suffered in the lulls and not in the gusts ?
How do you and the other crew normally compare on the race course when both sailing with jibs ?
>>>Off the breeze we could not split the two boats but were a little quicker rounding the top and bottm marks as the crew did not have to worry about the jib.
I gether you were both flying your spi's ?
Did the other have a selftacker ?
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Tornado sailing without jib
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#26838 12/11/03 06:51 PM 12/11/03 06:51 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 1,200 Vancouver, BC Tornado
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,200 Vancouver, BC | I tried this for the first time a few months back on my old SailCraft boat. It was rigged with a hobie style jib furler so I could easily get the jib back if needed. I was single-handed, not racing and the wind was 10-12 knots. I found tacking was quite easy, no real concern of getting into irons. Boat seemed to point at least as high as with jib and was still popping a hull up in the puffs. I was also surprised that there was no change in helm feel going to weather...and I didn't make any mast rake adjustments prior to departing. It did take a little time to learn to steer to windward without relying on the jib telltales though.
Still don't think this is a good heavy weather tactic as some seem to think. Boat seemed to still have plenty of power at ~12 knots wind speed...easily lifting the hull etc. I'll stick to my old technique of dropping the main when it gets too wild out there. Sailing on jib alone at > 20 knots windspeed is actually quite fun.
Mike.
Mike Dobbs Tornado CAN 99 "Full Tilt"
| | | Re: Interesting but one thing I don't understand ....
[Re: Wouter]
#26840 12/12/03 09:38 AM 12/12/03 09:38 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia Tornado_ALIVE OP
Pooh-Bah
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia | What I don't understand is the following :
you first state
>>(we were) closly followed by the sloop Tornado and on the upwind to the finish were overtaken to windward by the (sloop) T and finished second.
And than you state
>>Upwind we had a slight edge in hight and speed when we were powered up but in the lulls, suffered.
So did you or did you not have an overall edge when going upwind. If so how can you be overtaken to windward by a sloop rig ? If not then how much of an edge did you momenterally ? Did you loose so too much time on the tacks ? Or did you loose more during the lulls than you gained in the gusts ? What do you call powered up ? Do you have any idea why you suffered in the lulls and not in the gusts ?
Unfortunatly the top mark was close to the southern shore with a southerly breeze blowing. When we got close to it we were underpowered and only single traping. The finish line was closer to shore and the wind difference would have been about 10 knots. Neither of us could trap in this and the other T was powered up twin trap most of the time. By powered up I mean two on trapeze hull flying and full downhaul. We had only a few boat lenghts advantage over the upwind but when the breeze died we kept a cover on them and in our wind shadow. On the last upwind they were able to power under us in a lull and we could not catch as we headed for the finish. How do you and the other crew normally compare on the race course when both sailing with jibs ?
Ok we are normaly quicker...however over the season (since September) they have improved remarkably. At a regatta last fortnight they beat us in 1 off 5 races and were hot on our heels in 2 others. >>>Off the breeze we could not split the two boats but were a little quicker rounding the top and bottm marks as the crew did not have to worry about the jib.
I gether you were both flying your spi's ?
Did the other have a selftacker ?
Yes we were both flying spinnakers and he has a self tacker jib. We both use the same sail maker and we helped them with the rig conversion and tuning. We also helped them with their downwind technique and they are now trapezing of the rudder too. [/quote] | | | Re: Interesting but one thing I don't understand ....
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#26841 12/12/03 10:23 AM 12/12/03 10:23 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe |
Thanks alot Tornado_alive,
You experiences will be noted, it may well find its way into an adjustment of spi penalty to a certain handicap rule hence my interest in these reference tests.
>>>Unfortunatly the top mark was close to the southern shore with a southerly breeze blowing. When we got close to it we were underpowered and only single traping. The finish line was closer to shore and the wind difference would have been about 10 knots. Neither of us could trap in this and the other T was powered up twin trap most of the time.
Sound about right with the ratios for jib power we use right now. Or I should say it doesn't contradict it.
>>By powered up I mean two on trapeze hull flying and full downhaul.
Maximum rig power I understand Thanks. Were the guys with jib letting the main out or were they at the end of their downwind with the main centred. I want to know wether the main and jib can be expected to both produce maximum power or wether the jib was adding disproportionally to the overall sailpower.
>>>We had only a few boat lenghts advantage over the upwind but when the breeze died we kept a cover on them and in our wind shadow. On the last upwind they were able to power under us in a lull and we could not catch as we headed for the finish. >>>Ok we are normaly quicker...however over the season (since September) they have improved remarkably. At a regatta last fortnight they beat us in 1 off 5 races and were hot on our heels in 2 others.
So you would you consider the following a fair statement :
The fact that you were sailing without the jib was sufficient to correct for the difference in skill that can be expected between you and the other crew on the upwind legs ?
What would the outcome be if you switched setups in your estimation ? (To bad we don't have this as data that would have been really interesting)
Thanks alot for your replies,
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Interesting but one thing I don't understand ....
[Re: Wouter]
#26842 12/12/03 10:51 AM 12/12/03 10:51 AM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 612 Cape Town, South Africa Steve_Kwiksilver
addict
|
addict
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 612 Cape Town, South Africa | Hi WOuter & Steve, Similar experience way back in 1987 (!) crewing on a Mosquito in our National champs, old style olympic course. Fairly strong wind blowing, travelled out a bit on mainsail. After the 1st triangle we were lying 3rd, our jib halyard broke. Skipper was so pissed off that he wanted to retire, but I hauled the jib down, stuffed it in a tramp pocket & convinced him that a "bad position" would be better than DNF. We were now in 11th place in a fleet of 24, and worked our way back up to 6th through the rest of the race. We were fully powered up most of the race, pointed higher than our opponents, but tacked slower - no practice without jib ! We held position on the upwinds, sometimes gaining a place or 2. We gained the most places double-trapping down the reaches, passing a few sloops each leg, I found this quite strange. Managed to hold them off on the runs (Mozzies used to run goose-winged in those days !) The wind was in the 20`s, probably peaking at 25 knots. I won`t forget that race until I`m really old.
Cheers Steve | | | Re: Jib Alone
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#26844 12/12/03 02:20 PM 12/12/03 02:20 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 1,200 Vancouver, BC Tornado
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,200 Vancouver, BC | Rolf, Trick for sailing to weather under jib alone is not to  I only do this when things get too scary to handle, esp. when needing to head off wind and not risk pitchpolling. You cannot head higher than about 50 deg off apparent wind with jib alone..and the rudder loading can get really high (leehelm!), but the boat moves quite well...I've hit 12 knots in some bad blows. Tacking is quite difficult, esp. in heavy chop. If you must reach an upwind local, you can always gybe around the long way and work your way up there. Mike.
Mike Dobbs Tornado CAN 99 "Full Tilt"
| | | Re: Interesting but one thing I don't understand ....
[Re: Wouter]
#26845 12/15/03 03:00 AM 12/15/03 03:00 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia Tornado_ALIVE OP
Pooh-Bah
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia | Were the guys with jib letting the main out or were they at the end of their downwind with the main centred. I want to know wether the main and jib can be expected to both produce maximum power or wether the jib was adding disproportionally to the overall sailpower. The guys had full downhaul and were twisting of the main a bit to depower. We had full downhaul and main block to block. So you would you consider the following a fair statement :
The fact that you were sailing without the jib was sufficient to correct for the difference in skill that can be expected between you and the other crew on the upwind legs ?
What would the outcome be if you switched setups in your estimation ? (To bad we don't have this as data that would have been really interesting)
If we had a jib we would probably have beaten them convincingly as we love it when it blows. If we swapped I think the result would have been the same (we beat them). The loss of the jib would have made up for the skill level a bit but not as much as I would have expected. If we did not have to sail underpowered in the lulls I don't think there would be much of a speed difference between sloop and cat. | | | No Jib
[Re: Keith]
#26846 02/06/04 04:31 AM 02/06/04 04:31 AM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 851 US Western Continental Shelf hobiegary
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 851 US Western Continental Shelf | While revisiting this thread, I feel compelled to reply to each and all of you catsailors. I must, however, first reply to Keith, who has struck a chord with me. I was a solo sailor on a Hobie 18.
When you look at a modern catamaran you see such things as a Marstom 20 that sports a good sized mainsail and then has a great, big downwind sail. The Hobie 18, while adequately powered-up for a crew of two, has a very nice upwind power to weight ratio in moderate air for a solo sailor. Then downind, it can really "burn the coal" when the huge genoa is deployed. This is sailing the cat in its 'factory, stock' configuration. (circa 1978-ish)
The most pleasant day (of my cat-sailing life) involved a Hobie 18 and a windy day that disallowed me from flying my jib (genoa, nearly a "reacher" by today's standards) on the upwind runs. But when the downwind leg came to be, I was able to unfurl that great, big genoa and sail the downwind leg as if I was flying an asymetrical spinnaker!
I really think that we are going to see a future in cat-sailing that involves two sails; the mainsail and the downwind reacher. Hooray for the Hobie 18 for being on the forefront of the 'wave' of catsailing for the new melinium. (disclaimer: I don't sail a Hobie, don't give a care if Hobiecat ever succeeds or fails, nor do I care who builds the best catamaran, as long as I own one of them) (best equals 'the best cat for me')
My best suggestion for those who experiment with "main alone:" Try to relize and remember that you are sailing much higher (closer to the wind) than you would be sailing if you would have had a jib. Also, remember the huge amount of weather helm; when you tack, turn as far away from the wind as you can. When the rig 'powers up', you will naturally come back up, close to weather. Resist the tendancy for the boat to 'round up' to the wind!
The catamaran sailing community is moving through a change of sailing techniques. Jibs are being replaced by spinnakers, hooters, reachers, screachers, gennikers, and many other "off the wind sails." It is time that a lot of cat sailors will learn the new techniques that are associated with the new rigs. It is time to learn the new, and faster, sailing styles, or else... go fly a kite.
GARY
Santa Monica Bay Mystere 6.0 "Whisk" <--- R.I.P. | | | Re: Tornado sailing without jib
[Re: jollyrodgers]
#26848 02/07/04 03:19 PM 02/07/04 03:19 PM |
Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 125 Cape Coral, FL pete_pollard
member
|
member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 125 Cape Coral, FL | I once read that the function of a Tornado's jib was to "get the wee beasties head through the wind"
"Cat Fest Sailor"
Pete in Cape Coral
| | | Re: No Jib
[Re: hobiegary]
#26849 02/07/04 04:22 PM 02/07/04 04:22 PM |
Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 186 rbj
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 186 | Interesting experiences guys, thanks for sharing them.  Anybody have experience sailing an F18 without the jib singlehanded or doublehanded in a blow? Would one expect it to behave similarly or different from an TheMightyHobie18 or T? Also, when some of you guys dropped your main to sail jib only in a blow, any problems keeping the boat under control while dropping or re-raising the sail? Were you singlehanding or with crew at the time? Jerry | | | Re: No Jib
[Re: rbj]
#26850 02/10/04 09:34 PM 02/10/04 09:34 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 1,200 Vancouver, BC Tornado
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,200 Vancouver, BC | I can now claim to have sailed all 3 of those boats (F18(HT), the TheMightyHobie18 and Tornado) since I crewed on an F18HT in the nationals two weeks ago in FL. In the short time I actually helmed the HT, I can say the helm felt quite neutral (heavy air day) and the boat was responsive. While under spinnaker, it was a little twitchy. Can't say it felt much different to the Tornado w. main only. A surprise 'cause I thought the T would be more off balance since the mast placement with regrade to centerboard placement was designed with the jib in mind.
I've singlehanded the TheMightyHobie18 & Tornado many times and sailed both with just the jib a few times in strong blows. Dropping the main is always straightforward...just payout some traveller and turn rudder to weather, effectively stopping the boat ("heave-to" mode), secure the tiller under a foot strap or otherwise to hold the boat in the same position while you go to the mast and drop the sail. Usually is helps to bring the sail down slowly, rolling it as it comes out of the track...this stops it blowing overboard before it's all the way off the mast. Then I just stuff the rolled sail under the footstraps and off I go wit the jib alone. Now usually if there enough wind to make me drop the main, my first thought it to head in an call it a day after getting the main down. On occasion I have re-hoisted the main and continued sailing as normal if condtions change. Re-hoisting is just the reverse of dropping, except there will be less wind (if not...why are you putting the sail back up??).
Mike Dobbs Tornado CAN 99 "Full Tilt"
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
285
guests, and 47
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,062 Members8,150 | Most Online4,027 Jul 30th, 2025 | | |