| Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Tornado]
#72984 04/19/06 07:05 PM 04/19/06 07:05 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | I've heard this before and I've seen it from some pretty reliable sources...but looking at a globe I find it difficult to fathom how the relative size of polar caps can raise the entire ocean level of the globe 25 meters (wikipedia says if it were all to melt, it would be 60 meters). How is this possible? The artic ice cap has already shrunk by over 20% since the 70's. Is everyone counting the ice below the surface too?
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Jake]
#72986 04/19/06 07:14 PM 04/19/06 07:14 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... hobie1616
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... | I've heard this before and I've seen it from some pretty reliable sources...but looking at a globe I find it difficult to fathom how the relative size of polar caps can raise the entire ocean level of the globe 25 meters (wikipedia says if it were all to melt, it would be 60 meters). How is this possible? The artic ice cap has already shrunk by over 20% since the 70's. Is everyone counting the ice below the surface too? You have to include both polar ice caps and the various glaciers. US Sail Level 2 Instructor US Sail Level 3 Coach | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Jeff Peterson]
#72987 04/19/06 08:21 PM 04/19/06 08:21 PM |
Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 43 Falmouth, MA, USA RTodd
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 43 Falmouth, MA, USA | Since I'm at Scripps Institution of Oceanography (one of the leaders in climate science), and one of the scientists in the aforementioned NOVA episode has his office about 100 meters from mine, I feel compelled to chime in (briefly) on this one. It has certainly been more than two or three years since a scientific consensus about the reality of global warming was reached. Research into climate change (natural and anthropogenic) was prevelent by the early 1980's. Even before 1960, people like Dr. Charles Keeling (formerly of SIO) were monitoring the climate. His 'Keeling Curve', showing CO_2 levels atop Mauna Loa, Hawaii, is very well known and shows the increasing CO_2 levels in the past several decades. Of course, our knowledge of the Earth's climate increases all the time. While there is scientific consensus about the reality of global warming, it is important to realize that climate scientists do not know everything, and there are points on which scientists disagree. Models are only as good as the theory behind them and the observations driving them, and two models can give very different results. (We can't even get the weather for next week right...think about how hard it is to figure out the global climate in 50-100 years.) Disagreement at this level is how science works. Various hypotheses are formed, tested, and upheld or rejected. With time, some hypotheses become so strongly supported by observation, theory and experiment that they rise to the level of scientific theories, which are, for all intents and purposes, facts. It is a pity that larger acceptance of climate change as reality has taken so long. There is a problem, particularly in the US, of the general population refusing to accept what is considered to be scientific truth. The source of this problem, I believe, lies both with the public _and_ the scientists. As scientists, we certainly have a long way to go in communicating our findings beyond our small community. With that in mind, interested parties might wish to take a look at http://www.realclimate.org. I'm not affiliated with it, but it has proven to be a good source of scientifically accurate information and discussion. (Please note that controversial subjects are brought up, sometimes dealing with politics and science, so beware.) Also, a recent issue (perhaps the most recent issue) of Vanity Fair had a fun article showing the effects of sea level rise on areas like Martha's Vineyard (a classic sailing place, and hangout of Kennedy's et al.) and the Hamptons.
Robert Todd Capricorn F18 #151 Falmouth, MA
| | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: RTodd]
#72988 04/19/06 08:35 PM 04/19/06 08:35 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... hobie1616
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... | Vanity Fair had a fun article showing the effects of sea level rise on areas like Martha's Vineyard (a classic sailing place, and hangout of Kennedy's et al.) and the Hamptons. If the Kennedy's get flooded out will the wind powered generators be built? US Sail Level 2 Instructor US Sail Level 3 Coach | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: ktown]
#72990 04/19/06 11:29 PM 04/19/06 11:29 PM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 1,012 South Australia Darryl_Barrett
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,012 South Australia | Humans and Lemmings, all the same. We cannot hurt the earth in any major way. No matter what we do the earth will just take it in it's stride and cycle along through it and out the other side. Whether we, as the human race, or for that matter, all other forms of life are still here when it heals the scars that we give it doesn't really matter at all in the "scheme" of the "life" of the earth. “Once the dinosaurs ruled” (for a long, long time), we have only been here for a few seconds of time by comparison. Don’t think for one minute that our time as a species isn’t under constant threat of annihilation at any moment, why do you think it is that we seem to want to speed up that process so much instead of legitimately finding an alternative? If only a minute fraction of the resources that is spent annually on producing the means of killing our fellow humans was diverted into “productive” activities, our potential could be almost unlimited. Lemmings, humans, is there really much difference? | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Darryl_Barrett]
#72991 04/20/06 12:11 AM 04/20/06 12:11 AM |
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 66 Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA ReefedOne
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 66 Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA | Well darryl, you're certainly a cheery fellow from Down Under! Hmmm... significant ocean rise... well, that would take care of the affordable real estate problem in S. Florida... bummer for the Scripps folks who are moving to their new site here, lol. Everything south of Lake Okeechobee, the Keys, and even The Bahamas would be reefs. North of the Big O would be a chain of islands stretching up to Atlanta that might be fun to sail to. Note: The Arctic icecap is not a problem, since it is floating, right? i.e. Archimedes' Principle, if an ice cube melts in a glass of water, the water level does not change, because the cube was made up of EXACTLY the amount of water it was displacing, Q.E.D. The ANTarctic cap, OTOH, is largely on land, so could be interesting. If penguins wash up in Miami, I am SO OUT OF HERE! Hopefully this will reduce your anxieties by half, and allow you to return to worrying about a killer tsunami from Cumbre Viejo collapsing, or an asteroid collision. Sunny: Bike to the beach, hop on your sail boat, bike to the mountains and run a river in a kayak (yes, you can tow one behind a bike). Both you and the earth will be in better shape! That's just CRAZY talk! 'mer'cans have a God-given right to drive 8,000 lb. SUVs, gorge on fried foods, and celebrate their "prosperity" by developing cardiovascular disease! (At 5'11", 168#, I do NOT subscribe to this theory, lol.) | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: steveh]
#72992 04/20/06 04:38 AM 04/20/06 04:38 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe |
As a systems engineer I believe humans are powerful enough these days to "trip the system", however I also believe that humans are too dumb or stupid to do anything about it.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Wouter]
#72993 04/20/06 05:36 AM 04/20/06 05:36 AM |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 3,348 fin.
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348 |
As a systems engineer I believe humans are powerful enough these days to "trip the system", however I also believe that humans are too dumb or stupid to do anything about it.
Wouter
Fear and greed may be powerful enough motivation! When gas took it's first big jump, the sale of SUVs dropped 25%. The mere threat of disrupted oil suplies sent the price per barrel over $70! The result is that last night I paid $2.97 at the pump. | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Wouter]
#72996 04/20/06 10:08 AM 04/20/06 10:08 AM |
Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 141 Panama City Beach, FL steveh
member
|
member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 141 Panama City Beach, FL | Sunny said:
The earth naturally has an ebb and flow. I live in the middle of South Carolina, about 2 hours from the shore and yet where I live was once beechfront property. Fossils of shells and sand are common here. I think it would be ignorant to believe that sea levels won't change again. I do believe that in the grand scheme of things, humans are not mighty enough to destroy the earth. She is much older and more resiliant than we are. The earth will heal herself of what we do. If (when) there is another ice age, our population will decrease but survive and then we will have another go at it. Hopefully next time we will take better care.
Bike to the beach, hop on your sail boat, bike to the mountains and run a river in a kayak (yes, you can tow one behind a bike). Both you and the earth will be in better shape!
As a systems engineer I believe humans are powerful enough these days to "trip the system", however I also believe that humans are too dumb or stupid to do anything about it.
Wouter I agree with the latter half of what Sunny said and the first half of what Wouter said. The rest I take issue with. There are many areas that we have already dramatically changed. Off the top of my head: the Colorado River no longer flows into the Gulf of California, changing the salinity of the upper gulf, 20% of the Amazon rainforest is gone, resulting in a massize release of carbon and a change in solar albedo and local weather patterns and simulations of proposed tidal power generating plants using portions of the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia have shown tidal increases of 20% in Maine and changes in tides as far away as Boston. We can make significant local changes that we can see, measure and remedy if we chose. Globally, our effects are not as easy to see, measure or remedy, but that does not mean that it can't be done. Saying that we are too stupid to fix it is as dangerous and fatalistic as anthropomorphizing or deifying a rock that happens to be our home, claiming immaterially that she can heal herself. We have taken global action on the ozone depletion problem and while it will take decades for the CFCs to work through the system, we can expect to see improvements within our childrens' lifetimes. Global remedies for global problems that we caused can happen. Why can't we do the same for greenhouse gases? Is it because the likelihood of skin cancer is more frightening than a few inches of sea level rise and some nebulous, unknown tipping point? No, we can't hurt the Earth as a planet, but we can hurt the Earth as a home and that is what we need to change. | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: steveh]
#72997 04/20/06 10:12 AM 04/20/06 10:12 AM |
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway Rolf_Nilsen
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway | No, we can't hurt the Earth as a planet, but we can hurt the Earth as a home and that is what we need to change. Bingo! | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: steveh]
#72998 04/20/06 10:15 AM 04/20/06 10:15 AM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered |
No, we can't hurt the Earth as a planet, but we can hurt the Earth as a home and that is what we need to change.
Very well said Steve. | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: steveh]
#73000 04/20/06 11:27 AM 04/20/06 11:27 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | Why can't we do the same for greenhouse gases? ... No, we can't hurt the Earth as a planet, but we can hurt the Earth as a home and that is what we need to change.
I'm of the Kyoto generation. There is always some powerful nitwit who thinks his short term gains are more important then long term global benefits. And presto Kyoto was dead as a treaty. Currently the same things is being done with the non-proliferation treaty for exactly the same reasons, because some powerful nitwit feels he can score some short term personal gains. That is why humanity as a whole will always dependent on the harbour wall to turn the ship around. And that is stupid in my book. Or at least that is how I see it. Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: Mike Hill]
#73001 04/20/06 12:12 PM 04/20/06 12:12 PM |
Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 141 Panama City Beach, FL steveh
member
|
member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 141 Panama City Beach, FL | Global Warming is a fact. However I don't believe it has anything to do with Greenhouse Gases. I've looked at numerous charts on sun spot activity and they all line up perfectly with global warming and cooling. Imagine that the sun causing global warming? Interesting graph. Especially interesting is how the land temperature plot appears to preceed that of the solar activity plot over a good portion of those 300 years. Generally, a system with any sort of inertia will have the cause preceeding the effect. I also have a problem understanding how a plot of cycle length versus time means anything. The solar cycle length in 1800 was 26 years, yet about 10 years later the cycle length is 25 years? This makes sense? Statistical windowing can be useful for finding patterns in noisy data, but windowing time over time doesn't make sense. I wondered what the authors were thinking, so I Googled Baliunas and Soon and found that the report was done for the George C. Marshall Institute. I found several (many) papers addressing this topic, but nothing with this plot and an explanation. However, it's always fun to impugn "unbiased" "research" "institutes," so.... Their mission statement follows, emphasis mine. The George C. Marshall Institute was established in 1984 as a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation to conduct technical assessments of scientific issues with an impact on public policy.
In every area of public policy, from national defense, to the environment, to the economy, decisions are shaped by developments in and arguments about science and technology. The need for accurate and impartial technical assessments has never been greater. However, even purely scientific appraisals are often politicized and misused by interest groups.
The Marshall Institute seeks to counter this trend by providing policymakers with rigorous, clearly written and unbiased technical analyses on a range of public policy issues. Through briefings to the press, publication programs, speaking tours and public forums, the Institute seeks to preserve the integrity of science and promote scientific literacy. Now, one would think that a purely unbiased, scientific institute would likely publish papers that would fall somewhere in the middle of the laissez-faire industry line and the hard-core environmentalist line. However, looking at their list of publications on the environment, we see that most of the shots are taken at the environmetal groups and conservationist theories. Additionally, they support a position that they call "civic environmentalism" whereby government regulation merely points to problems and the free-market would provide for "the actual work of environmental protection up to collaborative efforts between industry and local governments." Personally, I trust the free market to make me money, not look after my or anyone else's well being. I also don't trust disparate local governments to stand up to the unified front of national industry groups. I'm not saying that solar maximums don't contribute to global warming, but it is interesting to see a scientist (Richard Willson in the article in the Space.com link) that accepts a solar cycle contribution but cautions against discounting industrial pollution as a significant factor. | | | Re: Now That Global Warming is Considered Real...
[Re: SunnyZ]
#73003 04/20/06 12:48 PM 04/20/06 12:48 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... hobie1616
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... | Regular on Maui is $3.39 this week. Even with the state regulating the price we expect to see the price jump $.14 next week. US Sail Level 2 Instructor US Sail Level 3 Coach | | |
|
0 registered members (),
572
guests, and 92
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,056 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |