| 2012 Equipment #88566 11/08/06 12:15 PM 11/08/06 12:15 PM |
Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 126 southern Ontario Twister OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 126 southern Ontario | This is from ISAF. "Tuesday at the ISAF Annual Conference in Helsinki, Finland, equipment was the hot topic, with the classes coming under the spotlight at both the ISAF Women’s Sailing Committee and the Equipment Committee. Looking towards the London 2012 Olympic Games, the Committee gave their approval to Submission 079 to delete Regulation 16.1.6, which currently limits the classes from which ISAF can choose the equipment for the Olympic Games and Regional Games. Here’s the verbiage of the regulation: The equipment for the Olympic Games and all Regional Games shall be chosen from the following classes: - Windsurfing: Funboard, Formula, Mistral, Neil Pryde RS:X - Single-Handed Dinghy: Finn, Laser, Laser Radial, Sunfish, Byte, Zoom, Europe - Multi-Crewed Dinghy: 29er, 420, 470, Fireball, Flying Dutchman, Lightning, Snipe, 49er - Keelboat: Etchells, Flying Fifteen, H-Boat, J-22, J-24, Soling, Yngling, Sonar, Star - Multihull: Hobie 16, Hobie Tiger, Tornado"
Will it still be only one multihull medal? Why consider the Tiger over the F18 (formula class not Nacra)? Other olympic classes such as Stars and Tornado utilize multiple manufacturers of hulls and rigging for a class. It would be like only consideringa Marstrom Tornado, not another manufacturer. My 2 cents. cheers
Ryan Dart 18 #4860
| | | Re: 2012 Equipment
[Re: Twister]
#88567 11/08/06 12:31 PM 11/08/06 12:31 PM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,121 Eastern NC, USA tshan
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,121 Eastern NC, USA | Why consider the Tiger over the F18 (formula class not Nacra)? Successful lobbying by Hobie Cat, their dealers and sailors? Not saying its bad, just most decisions like this are political in nature....maybe.
Tom | | | Re: 2012 Equipment
[Re: tshan]
#88568 11/08/06 12:42 PM 11/08/06 12:42 PM |
Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 126 southern Ontario Twister OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 126 southern Ontario | To hobie's credit, it would prolong the life of an older F18 design. I wonder how a second generation Tiger would change things. It would be hard to promote a MkII Tiger as the new top F18 and still market the old one as the Olympic class.
Ryan Dart 18 #4860
| | | Re: 2012 Equipment
[Re: Twister]
#88569 11/08/06 01:04 PM 11/08/06 01:04 PM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... Mary
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... | Why consider the Tiger over the F18 If that report is accurate -- Personally, I think it is because they want true one-design classes in the Olympics. Formula classes are kind of iffy and harder to explain to the spectators and viewing public. It is easier to be able to say, "All the boats in this group are identical." As far as why they specifically chose the Hobie Tiger, maybe they felt it was the one out of the F18 group that was most one-design. And that is probably true. I think they like the idea of having a manufacturer provide boats out of the box for the Olympics (like with the Laser), and maybe Hobie Company has said they can do that. Actually, it is probably a good thing that they have given three options of multihulls for the Olympic class, because it means that at least they are thinking of keeping us in there. It also appears to mean that they are looking at more affordable and more widely available options for the Olympic class. I guess the Tornado Class should be getting a bit nervous. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" /> | | | Re: 2012 Equipment
[Re: Twister]
#88575 11/09/06 06:01 AM 11/09/06 06:01 AM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 337 Victoria, Australia C2 Mike
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337 Victoria, Australia | Why consider the Tiger over the F18 (formula class not Nacra)? Other olympic classes such as Stars and Tornado utilize multiple manufacturers of hulls and rigging for a class.
Multiple manufacturers but still OD. The olympic games is about human achievement, not equipment (supposedly). F18 is just as much about different manufacturers competing as the sailors. IMHO the T should stay as the olympic boat. Tiger Mike | | | Re: 2012 Equipment
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#88576 11/09/06 06:08 AM 11/09/06 06:08 AM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 337 Victoria, Australia C2 Mike
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337 Victoria, Australia | Yep, it's the Tornado for the 2008 event but its not decided for the 2012 event at Weymouth yet. My quesion was more rethorical as I think the Tornado will remain the olympic multihull for a long time yet. I agree. Keep the T as the olympic boat and the Tiger/F18 separate. Both classes seem to work quite well with this system. If it were dropped, it would continue for quite some time but would gradually decline over time as there would be little reason for new blood to get into the class which would be a shame. Tiger Mike | | |
|
0 registered members (),
510
guests, and 40
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,062 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |