James,
Have you considered teh Guck snuffer in relation to the IO snuffer ? Same principle but the loop is halve way down the pole and the bag is more aerodynamic too. There shouldn't be much price difference too.
http://www.guckinc.com/skunk.htmSee picture at attachment. Just an idea.
On the issue of high and low and the double or single stay setup.
The lower you go with your pole the more you'll put the bows under bending stresses. Especially when you you lower your bridle strop too.
Alternatieves are to keep the catrigged stays and make an extra stay of small diameter dyneema line or something for the pole. The reduction is stresses caused by the absence of a bridle strop can then be used to lower the pole.
OR
You go for the bridle strop anyway and fit a pin between the pole and strop a la intl. tornado's. This would also allow fitting a high aspect jib sheeted from the mainbeam if that is of any interest to you.
I'm fitting the last option to my boat.
The last option also has the extra advantage that the pole is alot less likely to buckle and therefor I can get away with a smaller diameter pole with less wallthickness. I think it saves some 0.5 kg's to 0,75 kg's on the setup.
I can look up my calc when needed but that will take time.
A single stay does allow windward drops and hoist but these aer only done when manually handling the spi.
Wouter