| Shared Starts at Tradewinds #94078 01/02/07 10:44 PM 01/02/07 10:44 PM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,121 Eastern NC, USA tshan OP
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,121 Eastern NC, USA | The US F16 class is trying to get some support for multiple fleets sharing the same starting sequence, course and timing at the Tradewinds Regatta. Each class of X or more boats will be scored as a fleet within the larger start. X being the number that previously defined whether or not you had a separate start.
The benefits of this scenario are: more competitive starts, more boats on the course to engage tactically, camraderie across fleets (enhance the conversation around the keg at night), easier start sequence management for the RC (= more races potentially) and a great chance for the US Sailing Handicap Committee to collect data from a large/well attended regatta.
The down sides are: timing of each boat taxes the RC (offset by fewer starts??) and potential for a non-fleet boat mixing it up with two contenders of another fleet.
Rick has agreed to listen to the sailors and combine at least the Open Low Portsmouth and the F16s. If anyone else in boats of similar sailing characteristics (N20, F18, etc.) would like to participate, then speak up. I am sure we can have more in-depth discussions at the bar Friday night.
I know the F18s will have a large enough group for their own competitive racing, but the invitation is extended to them as well.
Thoughts? This is NOT a discussion about Open/Handicap racing. It is about inclusion, I think one of the biggest problems in US cat sailing is the plethora of boats to choose, then as soon as 5 of the same make/model show up to a regatta they want to be sanctioned off and treated as a separate entity. Not good for keeping new sailors in the "in group". My two cents.
Tom | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: tshan]
#94079 01/03/07 03:45 AM 01/03/07 03:45 AM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... Mary
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... | The US F16 class is trying to get some support for multiple fleets sharing the same starting sequence, course and timing at the Tradewinds Regatta. Each class of X or more boats will be scored as a fleet within the larger start. X being the number that previously defined whether or not you had a separate start. I'm not sure that what you are asking is different from normal. And I think you have got it backwards. Rick has ALWAYS combined multiple classes in the starts at Tradewinds. He does it to reduce the number of starts and also to make it more fun for fleets that don't have many boats. It is only if a class specifically does NOT want to be combined with another class that they ask Rick if they can have a SEPARATE start. That only happens if there is some compelling reason for it. It is very nice for the F16 class to invite other classes to start with them, but Rick probably would have combined the other classes in that start anyway. It sounds like the only difference is that you are asking the race committee to take times on ALL the boats in each start. If that is the case, my question is: Why? What is the purpose? | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: Mary]
#94080 01/03/07 08:15 AM 01/03/07 08:15 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 371 Michigan, USA sparky
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 371 Michigan, USA | It sounds like the only difference is that you are asking the race committee to take times on ALL the boats in each start. If that is the case, my question is: Why? What is the purpose? a great chance for the US Sailing Handicap Committee to collect data from a large/well attended regatta.
Les Gallagher
| | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: Mary]
#94081 01/03/07 08:21 AM 01/03/07 08:21 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | The US F16 class is trying to get some support for multiple fleets sharing the same starting sequence, course and timing at the Tradewinds Regatta. Each class of X or more boats will be scored as a fleet within the larger start. X being the number that previously defined whether or not you had a separate start. I'm not sure that what you are asking is different from normal. And I think you have got it backwards. Rick has ALWAYS combined multiple classes in the starts at Tradewinds. He does it to reduce the number of starts and also to make it more fun for fleets that don't have many boats. It is only if a class specifically does NOT want to be combined with another class that they ask Rick if they can have a SEPARATE start. That only happens if there is some compelling reason for it. It is very nice for the F16 class to invite other classes to start with them, but Rick probably would have combined the other classes in that start anyway. It sounds like the only difference is that you are asking the race committee to take times on ALL the boats in each start. If that is the case, my question is: Why? What is the purpose? Why, certainly it's a desperate search for ammunition for the trash talking machine gun of the F16 class! (which, by the way, is apparently a fad). <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: Mary]
#94083 01/03/07 09:24 AM 01/03/07 09:24 AM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,121 Eastern NC, USA tshan OP
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,121 Eastern NC, USA | We are only making it known that we would like for any fleet of similar characteristics to start as a single group. We value the larger fleet racing and will not be asking for our own start. If other fleets do not know that this invitation is open, then they cannot petition to be a part of it.
The ultimate decision obviously rests with the PRO/RC. There have been times in the past, maybe not at Tradewinds, where many small starts occurred, time between races was very long, etc. I was hoping to avoid that as much as possible. I am not asking that all times be taken, only times in a large combined fleet (potentially large, may not happen). If an OD/Formula fleet chooses to race on their own, then they do not need to be timed.
I apologize if it came across as being self serving.
Tom | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: sparky]
#94084 01/03/07 10:03 AM 01/03/07 10:03 AM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... Mary
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... | Les (Sparky), But timed results are only valid in terms of boats that are all racing on Portsmouth (against the clock).
If you have a start that involves one-design class(es) (racing against the other boats within their class) and also Portsmouth class(es) (racing aganst the clock), and you take times on all the boats in that particular start, it is like comparing apples and oranges.
The Portsmouth boats only have to worry about strategy to get around the course in the shortest possible time. The one-design classes also have to worry about tactics, which can often result in them taking longer around the course than if they did not have to worry about things like covering their opponents even if it takes them to a side of the course with less wind and slower speeds.
So how would the times be relevant in terms of Portsmouth handicapping? | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: BrianK]
#94086 01/03/07 10:41 AM 01/03/07 10:41 AM |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 3,348 fin.
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348 | | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: BrianK]
#94089 01/03/07 01:40 PM 01/03/07 01:40 PM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. Timbo
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. | I think we need another installment of "Inside Cat Racing" as well. Finally get to bottom of what JC is doing in his room late at night to make him so fast. I mean, is Kenny polishing his head with canuba wax or what??
Inquiring minds want to know!
Blade F16 #777
| | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: Timbo]
#94090 01/03/07 02:21 PM 01/03/07 02:21 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 548 MERRITTISLAND, FL Matt M
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 548 MERRITTISLAND, FL | If you guys want race straight up with the F18's, then bring it. If you want to be scored seperate or you want to keep your dpn, then you aren't bringing anything to the table that I'm interested in.
Even if we are on the same start, I'm still only going to race those in my class. Again, when would I ever want to engage someone I'm not racing against?
I'm in for straight up racing. My only sugestions was that because it is midwinters for the class and a Harken seriers race a separate class score be tracked as well. It makes no sense to put boats of drastically dissimilar performance together on a start. (Waves vs I20) If they have the capability to be in the same ball park, then we are doing ourselves a disservice to separate into a million splinter groups. If I am on a course, I am judging my performance by those around me whether they are in the same boat or not. There are people I will most likely not beat no matter what boat I am on, but that does not mean I don't try. There is a range of ability in all of the classes and has nothing to do with the hull length. The good teams are going to win the start and the bad teams are going to get rolled by somebody. I'm comming down for the party anyway so all this is a little moot. Sailing is a social thing for me. I do not get money for this, but I do have competitve nature so on the water I will try to beat whoever is close to me. We do not have enough numbers to be elitist. You sail together, you have the same stories about what happened to who afterwards. There are no huge fleets of C fleet anymore. New sailors coming in are having to race with guys with years of experieince. If the last place I20 team has a great battle all weekend with the last place F16 team then who cares if they are not in the same "class", it was good racing and they probably both learned lots. M2C Matt | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: Matt M]
#94091 01/03/07 03:11 PM 01/03/07 03:11 PM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered | If you guys want race straight up with the F18's, then bring it. If you want to be scored seperate or you want to keep your dpn, then you aren't bringing anything to the table that I'm interested in.
Even if we are on the same start, I'm still only going to race those in my class. Again, when would I ever want to engage someone I'm not racing against?
I'm in for straight up racing. My only sugestions was that because it is midwinters for the class and a Harken seriers race a separate class score be tracked as well. It makes no sense to put boats of drastically dissimilar performance together on a start. (Waves vs I20) If they have the capability to be in the same ball park, then we are doing ourselves a disservice to separate into a million splinter groups. If I am on a course, I am judging my performance by those around me whether they are in the same boat or not. There are people I will most likely not beat no matter what boat I am on, but that does not mean I don't try. There is a range of ability in all of the classes and has nothing to do with the hull length. The good teams are going to win the start and the bad teams are going to get rolled by somebody. I'm comming down for the party anyway so all this is a little moot. Sailing is a social thing for me. I do not get money for this, but I do have competitve nature so on the water I will try to beat whoever is close to me. We do not have enough numbers to be elitist. You sail together, you have the same stories about what happened to who afterwards. There are no huge fleets of C fleet anymore. New sailors coming in are having to race with guys with years of experieince. If the last place I20 team has a great battle all weekend with the last place F16 team then who cares if they are not in the same "class", it was good racing and they probably both learned lots. M2C Matt You're the Mattador from now on. | | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: Matt M]
#94092 01/03/07 04:48 PM 01/03/07 04:48 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA David Ingram
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA | If you guys want race straight up with the F18's, then bring it. If you want to be scored seperate or you want to keep your dpn, then you aren't bringing anything to the table that I'm interested in.
Even if we are on the same start, I'm still only going to race those in my class. Again, when would I ever want to engage someone I'm not racing against?
I'm in for straight up racing. My only sugestions was that because it is midwinters for the class and a Harken seriers race a separate class score be tracked as well. It makes no sense to put boats of drastically dissimilar performance together on a start. (Waves vs I20) If they have the capability to be in the same ball park, then we are doing ourselves a disservice to separate into a million splinter groups. If I am on a course, I am judging my performance by those around me whether they are in the same boat or not. There are people I will most likely not beat no matter what boat I am on, but that does not mean I don't try. There is a range of ability in all of the classes and has nothing to do with the hull length. The good teams are going to win the start and the bad teams are going to get rolled by somebody. I'm comming down for the party anyway so all this is a little moot. Sailing is a social thing for me. I do not get money for this, but I do have competitve nature so on the water I will try to beat whoever is close to me. We do not have enough numbers to be elitist. You sail together, you have the same stories about what happened to who afterwards. There are no huge fleets of C fleet anymore. New sailors coming in are having to race with guys with years of experieince. If the last place I20 team has a great battle all weekend with the last place F16 team then who cares if they are not in the same "class", it was good racing and they probably both learned lots. M2C Matt I just want to make it clear that I do not speak for the F18 fleet. If both the F18 fleet and F16 fleet are down with this arrangement then let's do it. But, I'm not at all interested in sailing straight up against the N20's.
David Ingram F18 USA 242 http://www.solarwind.solar"Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda "Excuses are the tools of the weak and incompetent" - Two sista's I overheard in the hall "You don't have to be a brain surgeon to be a complete idiot, but it helps"
| | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: David Ingram]
#94093 01/03/07 04:51 PM 01/03/07 04:51 PM |
Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL waterbug_wpb
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL | Wuss
<img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />
Jay
| | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: F18OxJ]
#94096 01/03/07 06:12 PM 01/03/07 06:12 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA David Ingram
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA | My vote is if we get 10 or more F18s then we should race as our own fleet. It is our mid-winters and we should be scored as our own fleet. Also, I'm not sure if a separate start is required for the race to count for our class rankings (Ding - any idea?).
My thinking is that if you want to race with the F18s then get an F18.
I'm not a fan of Portsmouth racing and prefer to avoid it as much as possible. That is a big reason I race an F18, because we typically get good turnout of boats.
Now, if F16s want to race straight up then maybe I could be talked into that.
One problem with clumping boats of different speeds into a single start is that you may have fewer starts, but you end up waiting longer for everyone to finish. What freaking Olli said! I'll have to check with Tracie about the scoring I suspect that might be an issue.
David Ingram F18 USA 242 http://www.solarwind.solar"Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda "Excuses are the tools of the weak and incompetent" - Two sista's I overheard in the hall "You don't have to be a brain surgeon to be a complete idiot, but it helps"
| | | Re: Shared Starts at Tradewinds
[Re: tshan]
#94097 01/03/07 06:21 PM 01/03/07 06:21 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | I think the main invitation given out the F16 class to all SIMILAR performant boats was lost somewhat in the thread.
This invitation is the result of my proposal to invite the F17 (nacra 17's) to the F16 fleet (our fleet). By this time the F16 class has enough boats at the tradewinds regatta to demand their own start. The US F16 association has decided NOT to excersize that right because it does not believe this to be in the best interest of US cat sailing or even in the best interest of the F16 sailors.
Certainly on my accord I feel that it is just plain silly to have 2 nacra 17's compete in the open Portsmouth class when these boats are so similar to the F16's that it will be alot more fun for all to welcome them to the F16 fleet. This is what lead to my proposal of inviting the Nacra 17's to race the F16's on a first in wins basis. Call it a challenge to Bob Curry and friend to show how much of a FAD boat the F16's really are.
After discussing this proposal in the US F16 class Tom Shannon came back to us with an even wider invitation. So not only Nacra 17's are welcomed but all catamarans of comparable performance. I intepreted this as an invitation to both the Nacra 17's and F18's to form a single fleet that races on "first in wins". A bold move by the US F16 association as indeed the F18's have their midwinters at tradewinds, but still it was felt that an invitation should be truly open to all. And so it was announced.
There was of course another element in Toms invitation and one that confused many of us. This was the point that it may be enjoyable if all boats of similar behavour were groupped together. This would put the I-20's and N6.0's in the fleet with the F16's and nacra 17's because all are pretty close together in speed. This may indeed be a little open minded for most US sailors. But the this part of the invitation stands.
Still I personally feel that the invitation to the nacra 17's and F18's is the most important one as those boats are truly very comparable around the course and can race first in wins with a "crate of beer" price to final winner.
So Nacra 17 sailors what do you say ? Bob ? F18's ?
Wouter
Last edited by Wouter; 01/03/07 06:23 PM.
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
522
guests, and 48
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |