Two reasons for this ;

First, like this everybody had ample occassion to make up their own minds about the proposed changes without any danger form my "meddling". I couldn't do it weeks ago as then you would have claimed that I was influencing people before they had a change to work things out themselfs "=meddling". No matter what I do (or did) I will get blamed for some wrong doing anyway.

Secondly :

Who says that my comments hadn't been put up for consideration earlier.

If that is what you think then my question is why my comments haven't reached you 2 months ago. Don't blame me for internal communication failings inside the governing council. And since it is now clear that that route didn't work very well, answer me this. What other route do I have as a normal class member (not an official in any way) to reintroduce my comments ?

Exactly, the forum ; in combo with the method deviced for processing idea's and modifications. It was stated precisely that established proposals could only be "voted in" or "voted out". Amending the wording was not a possibility, neither was cancelling a vote.

The current GC constructed this framework and I'm only using the pathways that are available to me at this time. Don't blame me for it; if anything it is not my fault.

And I certainly don't appreciate the fact that I get yelled at by you in this respect. I took the only possible route that was available to me.

Wouter


P.S. This is not the complete picture of downsides and why I feel the proposed modification is less then attractive. If desired then I'm willing to make a rigurous document out of it. One that clearly identifies all aspects and how the modification could be worded better. Right now I have to do several hours of fuzzy logic control design (again)