I voted in favour of ballot 2 but I too am less then convinced with the actuall wording. However I found these objections to be too small to vote against the rule.



This goes directly against the fundamental principle of the F16 class and therefor this syntax can not and should not be applied. The fundamental principle is "total freedom of design and modification under the limit of general quality in racing"

It seems to me that as good as all F16 class members are in favour of modifying and adding the rules, but there is unease over the actual proposed wordings.

It is my believe that relatively small adjustement to the proposed modifications can result in complete support by all involved parties, without altering the intended goals.

I would like to propose to the GC to investigate whether this can be adressed. This is a repeat of an early request of mine that was give in private.

Wouter