"Quote"
I feel this is the core of the problem. The F16 class as a whole may well agree with everything the GC does (even when I don't) but the GC needs to argue their case to us all here on the forum/webpage and allow the membership to exercize its rights of oversight. Currently that is not done (whatever the reason for that are)

Give us an example on what you think we have done and not discussed with the members. Probably you know more then the GC.

"Quote"
More importantly the GC would be wise to seek and acquire majority support for their idea's and projects before initiating and implementing them. That saves us all alot of emotional arguing when members find out "after the deal is done" that they are not in agreement. That is the F16 tradition.

I am interested what "deal" you are reffering to. I have no idea what you mean.