"Several countries are destabilizing"
<br>
<br>Which ones...and who cares? You won't see any freedom loving - democratically elected government having any kind of a destabilization from this - if a dictatorship has a problem with their people, that's their problem, not ours.
<br>
<br>"More and more opposition is being voiced louder and louder"
<br>
<br>By who...and so what? I'm not concerned with dictatorships having a problem with the US actions to defend itself.
<br>
<br>"Colleteral (?) damage (non terrorist deaths) are being reported"
<br>
<br>That's war...it's not really considered "colateral damage" when you are at war with a country. Imagine if you will what the results would have been in WWII had we considered damage to Frankfurt "colateral" while we were bombing Berlin. Ludicrous. When you are at war, you fool yourself into believing there is such a thing as "collateral damage." Personally, I'm beginning to think that feeding the Afgan people, while trying to defeat their government is folly. If we choose to feed them after their government is defeated, that is another thing, but to try to do so while carrying out military operations against them is somewhat ludicrous I think. It's as if their starvation has something to do with the US and we must do something about it...their starvation is due 100% to their government, which they in at least some part help put into power.
<br>
<br>"BIn Laden or any terrorists are still not found or harmed"
<br>
<br>Patience, patience.
<br>
<br>"Backlash of more possibe attacks in the USA."
<br>
<br>Only when the "evil doers" are banished from the planet will be truly worry-free from "possible attacks."
<br>
<br>"UN and Kofi Annan get Nobel peace price as a hint that USA must not forget the UN. Also the USA not beside the international law."
<br>
<br>We are ABSOLUTELY not tied to "international law" if it's the opinion poll of the UN that you're talking about. We are tied to the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution will trump the UN Charter every time - for any American citizen. I don't pay taxes to the UN to protect my country, and trust me, that would be the last group I would expect to protect my interests or security.
<br>
<br>"And USA is trying to influence reporters and reports which is now awfully close to the borderline of pressured sensorship."
<br>
<br>Advising the US media to not further the Taliban war effort by silencing their military leaders from making statements on TV is quite rational. We're at war, we don't recognize the "rights" of the press to advertise to the adversary our positions or to signal our enemies instructions to their operatives. You are making the error of thinking that our adversary has certain "rights" to our media. Once we declared war on the government of Afganistan, they lost all "rights" except those given to them under the rules of war, such as treatment of prisoners. Most US media outlets our owned by US citizens who have absolutely no problem with following the requests of our President during time of war.
<br>
<br>Don't sweat it, as I said earlier, the US will rid the planet of these criminals for you and you will continue to live free in a world whose security we, in large part, secured for you.
<br>
<br>SC
<br>
<br><br><br>