Why does the EU need two measurement rating systems? ... Is this ISAF’s heavy and stupid hand at play?
Is this just BS national politics and some ego driven personalities at play… There are only a limited number of things to measure and a handful of ways to measure them. The proof is in the pudding where people instantly figure out if the rating differences are fair or not. If the system is fair… it gets adopted. Why doesn’t SCHRS just throw in the towel and go away since texel appears to be more popular.… (True???)

Why pay money for a service that Texel accomplishes with volunteers and now they seem to be responding to the users critiques by issuing two updates to the system within the last two years wheras ISAF is contemplating their collective navel. (All of the Portsmouth yardstick committees are volunteers as well). Who is complaining about the current Texel ratings as being off base and unfair to some.

Mark