| Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#133640 02/28/08 06:02 PM 02/28/08 06:02 PM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 201 Adelaide South Australia ratherbsailing
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 201 Adelaide South Australia | This is interesting No one want to post actual data? On the other thread only one person was willing to post there actual boat weight. WHAT IS EVERYONE HIDING.I will post my boat weight in a couple of weeks when we all have our boats measured just waiting for national association to be sorted out. | | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#133648 02/28/08 08:33 PM 02/28/08 08:33 PM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 1,012 South Australia Darryl_Barrett
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,012 South Australia | I fail to see any relevance between the minimum weight of the F16 formula “box rule” and the respective individual weights of the boats actually out there sailing that fall within that box rule. IF, the F16 “class” of catamarans were a ONE DESIGN class, then yes the minimum weight would have a much greater significance, as most, if not all those cats would probably be “manufactured” by one “professional” builder and that minimum weight would/should be the consistent weight of each and every boat produced by that manufacturer. BUT THE F16 IS NOT A ONE DESIGN CLASS. Its dimensions are bound by its box rule formula, whereby each cat eligible to compete within that class has only to fall within the maximum and the minimum dimensions of that box rule. The cats eligible to compete within this “class” can be built by ANYONE, and as such they will obviously vary in many different ways from one to another, and as long as they all still fall within the “box rule” (no matter who builds them or what their relative shapes) there should be no problem (or argument) As far as the minimum weight is concerned, it is one of the dimensions that is an objective to be achieved and if some boats at present do not get down to that weight then what does it really matter – some do weigh the minimum! – And more will as the class matures. It is not really a question of “why are some boats overweight” but more of not having the problem of boats regularly being sailed under weight and trying to compete below that weight without penalty. The minimum weight is a goal that is, at this time, not universally achieved, but like many classes before where many cats within those classes did not come in at their minimum allowable weight, over time they all did. The Mosquito in Australia, which is a one design class of cat that is an “association defined” class (similar in many ways to the formula concept), for many years were all built “overweight” but for some years now they have all managed to be built at or below minimum weight and need to carry “correctors” to ensure that they fall within their allowable weight. During the 1970’s there was this same argument within the mosquito association that the minimum weights should be raised to “make it fairer for all the – heavy – boats, to compete”. They are all glad now that decision wasn’t taken. | | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: macca]
#133651 02/28/08 09:13 PM 02/28/08 09:13 PM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered | Weight is only one of the parameters that builders/designers are able to optimize against. Another book you may find useful - http://press.princeton.edu/TOCs/c8219.html | | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: macca]
#133653 02/28/08 09:18 PM 02/28/08 09:18 PM |
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 322 South Australia Marcus F16
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322 South Australia | Andrew,
You question regarding data from Zandvoort can be answered. This info is fact, not fiction or opinion.
Average weight of the cat rigged boats was 109kgs Average weight of the sloop rigged boats was 112kgs
I have included the 2007 VMW boats, the 2007 FCA boat, the 2007 Ned boats & the 2007 Stealths - all boats that are relevant to the discussion.
From a munufacturers point of view, our boat weighed 110.7kgs at the event & we have found 4kgs in savings since the event & looking for the last couple of kgs without compromising integrity or using exotics.
Therefore I guess the question has been answered.?
Marcus Towell
Formula Catamarans Aust Pty Ltd
| | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: macca]
#133655 02/28/08 09:36 PM 02/28/08 09:36 PM |
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 81 singapore ckuang
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 81 singapore | So are you saying that there is no disadvanage in competing with a F16 that is heavier than the min weight? Macca, after sailing the Taipan F16 and the Viper, I know I would be faster on the Viper than the Taipan F16 in all conditions despite the Viper being 18kgs over minimum weight. I don't think weight alone is the one and end all of good boat design. | | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: Marcus F16]
#133656 02/28/08 09:40 PM 02/28/08 09:40 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,021 Australia macca OP
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021 Australia | Andrew,
You question regarding data from Zandvoort can be answered. This info is fact, not fiction or opinion.
Average weight of the cat rigged boats was 109kgs Average weight of the sloop rigged boats was 112kgs
I have included the 2007 VMW boats, the 2007 FCA boat, the 2007 Ned boats & the 2007 Stealths - all boats that are relevant to the discussion.
From a munufacturers point of view, our boat weighed 110.7kgs at the event & we have found 4kgs in savings since the event & looking for the last couple of kgs without compromising integrity or using exotics.
Therefore I guess the question has been answered.? Thanks Marcus, But what is the sample size and the Standard Deviation (for Wouter) ie is there a list of boats weighed? From the data supplied it appears that the current fleet is on average 5kg over the min class weight for both Cat and Sloop boats. So what happens to those early adapters to the class (those that put their money down on a boat when the class was just being talked about) when the new boats come out that are 5kg lighter? Tough luck for them hey? I assume you have left the Viper out of the figures because it hurts the average? What happens to the figures when you exclude the heaviest boat (Viper) and the lightest boat (Hans' Blade) | | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: macca]
#133658 02/28/08 11:44 PM 02/28/08 11:44 PM |
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 322 South Australia Marcus F16
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322 South Australia | Andrew,
You question regarding data from Zandvoort can be answered. This info is fact, not fiction or opinion.
Average weight of the cat rigged boats was 109kgs Average weight of the sloop rigged boats was 112kgs
I have included the 2007 VMW boats, the 2007 FCA boat, the 2007 Ned boats & the 2007 Stealths - all boats that are relevant to the discussion.
From a munufacturers point of view, our boat weighed 110.7kgs at the event & we have found 4kgs in savings since the event & looking for the last couple of kgs without compromising integrity or using exotics.
Therefore I guess the question has been answered.? Thanks Marcus, But what is the sample size and the Standard Deviation (for Wouter) ie is there a list of boats weighed? From the data supplied it appears that the current fleet is on average 5kg over the min class weight for both Cat and Sloop boats. So what happens to those early adapters to the class (those that put their money down on a boat when the class was just being talked about) when the new boats come out that are 5kg lighter? Tough luck for them hey? I assume you have left the Viper out of the figures because it hurts the average? What happens to the figures when you exclude the heaviest boat (Viper) and the lightest boat (Hans' Blade) Andrew I was simply indicating what the current weight average of the latest boats produced & yes excluded the viper as it fits the F16 box rule, but even Greg Goodall looked dissapointed when the scales clocked 137kgs at Zandvoort. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/mad.gif" alt="" /> 5kgs is not a huge amount of weight to be concerned about given that some of the interesting performers at Zandvoort were sailing boats that did not even fall into the averages that were presented. ie// Belgium crew got a bullet in a race where you would have bet on a lighter platform. The sloop rigged stealth (father & son team) finished 3rd in two of the races, certainly showing the way to the majority of lighter boats. Excluding Han's boat is not really applicable as his boat was 2kgs overweight. Tough luck for some - I think the same could be said for the F18 sailors who purchased early hobie, nacra & capricorn F18s until the newer revised designs came out ( not so much for hobie). Sometimes people take a chance knowing that there is allways the latest & greatest gizmo around the corner. I bet Bill Gates sleeps well at night. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />
Marcus Towell
Formula Catamarans Aust Pty Ltd
| | | Re: Actual real data from the GC in Zandvort 2007
[Re: macca]
#133659 02/28/08 11:50 PM 02/28/08 11:50 PM |
Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,479 Thailand Buccaneer
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479 Thailand | Andrew,
You question regarding data from Zandvoort can be answered. This info is fact, not fiction or opinion.
Average weight of the cat rigged boats was 109kgs Average weight of the sloop rigged boats was 112kgs
I have included the 2007 VMW boats, the 2007 FCA boat, the 2007 Ned boats & the 2007 Stealths - all boats that are relevant to the discussion.
From a munufacturers point of view, our boat weighed 110.7kgs at the event & we have found 4kgs in savings since the event & looking for the last couple of kgs without compromising integrity or using exotics.
Therefore I guess the question has been answered.? Thanks Marcus, But what is the sample size and the Standard Deviation (for Wouter) ie is there a list of boats weighed? From the data supplied it appears that the current fleet is on average 5kg over the min class weight for both Cat and Sloop boats. So what happens to those early adapters to the class (those that put their money down on a boat when the class was just being talked about) when the new boats come out that are 5kg lighter? Tough luck for them hey? I assume you have left the Viper out of the figures because it hurts the average? What happens to the figures when you exclude the heaviest boat (Viper) and the lightest boat (Hans' Blade) Here we go again... <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> The Viper has gained advantages over the other F16's because if the larger volume hulls and stiffer platform but it cost them in weight i.e. it's a trade-off. Get it? This is how formula racing works. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
"House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals." – Ben Bernanke – 2005
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
514
guests, and 29
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |