Announcements
New Discussions
Best spinnaker halyard line material?
by '81 Hobie 16 Lac Leman. 03/31/24 10:31 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Why can't Nacra compete in F16 #212787
06/06/10 10:56 AM
06/06/10 10:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
Are they incompetent?


Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

--Advertisement--
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #212788
06/06/10 10:58 AM
06/06/10 10:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,584
+31NL
Tony_F18 Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Tony_F18  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,584
+31NL
ahhh, more useless threads...

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Tony_F18] #212790
06/06/10 11:03 AM
06/06/10 11:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Timbo Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Timbo  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049
Sebring, Florida.
Maybe they don't want to "compete" against some of their other products, like the I17 and F18? There are only so many interested buyers out there.


Blade F16
#777
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Tony_F18] #212792
06/06/10 11:25 AM
06/06/10 11:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
Glad you feel that way. Go back to the F18 forum and give them the benefit of all your wonderful knowledge.

Well, Tim, If I follow your logic then Nacra does see the F16 as a threat; which I suspect is the case. That would also explain why Nacra sends it's drivers over here to bad mouth us. They can't make a real case for their own products so they are forced to criticize their competitiors. That is a weak position indeed.

Has anyone heard anything about Nacra's financial state? This is a very tough economic time, maybe they are about to fold up shop! You just never know.

Last edited by pgp; 06/06/10 11:31 AM.

Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #212794
06/06/10 11:44 AM
06/06/10 11:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe

Pete,

I think Tony gave you the proper reply here.

Are you looking for more **** fights or helping to end this chaos ?

Bad mouthing nacra or hobie won't do anyone good.

Wouter

Last edited by Wouter; 06/06/10 11:45 AM.

Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Wouter] #212795
06/06/10 11:45 AM
06/06/10 11:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
Just calling it like I see it. This is not a good faith negotiation. It is a **** fight and invariably the worst offenders are Nacra drivers. Ask yourself why?

Last edited by pgp; 06/06/10 11:46 AM.

Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #212796
06/06/10 11:50 AM
06/06/10 11:50 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe

Yes, but the upshot of that attitude is that you are actually starting half the **** fights yourself.

So please will you do us a favour and vent your frustration over a beer in a group of friends, but not as new controversial threads that rehash old topics over and over again.

I and several others will be very thankful indeed.

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Wouter] #212799
06/06/10 12:09 PM
06/06/10 12:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
Wouter you won't win this fight by being nice. Out of respect for the efforts you've put into the F16 class I'll drop this thread. But that doesn't mean you're right...


Last edited by pgp; 06/06/10 12:17 PM.

Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #212801
06/06/10 12:54 PM
06/06/10 12:54 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Arsailor Offline
journeyman
Arsailor  Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
NACRA, and/or Hobie, could clearly come up with a competitive F16- especially if they put some of their "rock stars" on them to sail them. They are businesses and they make product decisions based on the bottom line, and apparently have done so successfully despite what some of us (including myself) might think about those decisions. This is why they are still probably in business and have survived rough times before. Both, in the past, have definitely preferred SMOD boats over "open" or development boats- Hobie even passes rules NOT allowing any other "brand" of boat at their sanctioned regattas. Witness the Hobie "near-A" that is essentially a SMOD "A" cat. If either could, they would turn the F18 into a SMOD, with their particular hulls being the class-approved ones (witness Hobie's plans for the Tiger and holding separate Tiger regattas). We are (presently) a small market from their perspective, we are "open" so that means there product will be judged directly in comparison to others in price, quality, etc. and we are a sailor controlled class compared to their manufacturer controlled model. Additionally, in this economy, justifying the development and start-up costs for an entirely new "model" which not be able to utilize many of the company's current components (which clearly keeps costs down in many ways- well known in autos, power boats, RV's, ess any mass produced product). In the case of NACRA at least, it appears their "approach" is simply to try to lure potential F16 buyers to one of their current products- F18, Inter 17 (Formula now?- THERE is an OBVIOUS reason they renamed the "Inter" IMO- American mentality of "more is better"- if an F16 is good then an F17 MUST be better!), the Hobie 16 or FX1, etc. Much more cost effective for them to do that than develop and market a new product.
THIS is why IMO what we, as F16 sailors, need to do is really help our current manufacturers- Support them ALL!! A little "ribbing" between brands is great and "I like my boat better because...." is helpful but bashing/criticizing OUR manufacturers, for any reason, is playing right into the hands of our "competition" for new/current sailors. All this derision about weight, etc. is playing right into their hands too IMO. It projects a vision of a fractionated, derisive class. Heck Hobie 16's weights vary greatly but you don't hear them really bashing their manufacturer. We need to be more like the "A" class- in the "A" class we just love the boats and the concept- we have a ton of different boat builders and every boat has it's merits- As has been pointed out many times, every boat is a compromise- what makes them different is where and how the compromises differ.
That's just how I see it- Your opinion may differ and that's fine!

Kirt


Kirt
Taipan 4.9 USA 159, Flyer USA 185
Will sail for food...
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #212829
06/06/10 04:49 PM
06/06/10 04:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe

Pete,

Thank you, I truly appreciate that.

Wouter


Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Arsailor] #212842
06/06/10 08:06 PM
06/06/10 08:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
Brisvegas
ACE11 Offline
member
ACE11  Offline
member

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
Brisvegas
+ 1 Kirt - great post. This should be in the "opportunities" thread.
As someone from outside F16 but inside formula sailing I reckon you have great opportunities here. If Hobie and/or Nacra produce a boat fitting the F16 parameters and it is competitive then it just gives you more choice. They'll do that if they see a viable market and are able to make a quid. In the meantime stop worrying about it and sail the already good choice of boats you have - they all have various attributes which suit some and not others. Welcome to the wonderful world of formula sailing.

Now to lighten things up this following statement is made purely in jest and I mean no detriment or offence to anyone. So lets go enjoy and grow the sport of sailing (maybe even the monoslug sailors!)

A Class = too expensive
F18 = too heavy
F16 = too precious/argumentative
F14 = too few
F12 = too small

Cheers
Have a good day

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: ACE11] #212849
06/06/10 08:28 PM
06/06/10 08:28 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Arsailor Offline
journeyman
Arsailor  Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Thanks Ace! Just back from a nice sail on my Taipan- Gave one of the monoslug sailors a pin for hitch so he could get his boat out- he was about to use a screwdriver and locking wrench since he didn't have a pin!
That's what sailing should be about- helping each other get out on the water and having fun! I work too much/too hard to have my sailing turn into work!

Kirt


Kirt
Taipan 4.9 USA 159, Flyer USA 185
Will sail for food...
same reason they don't make A-cats [Re: Arsailor] #213236
06/09/10 09:53 AM
06/09/10 09:53 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479
Thailand
Buccaneer Offline
veteran
Buccaneer  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479
Thailand
Why? For the same reason they don't make A-cats i.e. bottom line, profit margins, too much effort required, etc. whistle


"House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals." – Ben Bernanke – 2005
Re: same reason they don't make A-cats [Re: Buccaneer] #213323
06/09/10 09:28 PM
06/09/10 09:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 951
Brisbane, Queensland, Australi...
ncik Offline
old hand
ncik  Offline
old hand

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 951
Brisbane, Queensland, Australi...
Warranty of "light" boats is a potential business killer.

My understanding is the european warranty laws are strict. Not such a problem for small, boutique builders because buyers realise they will get over the phone support but not as much replacement support. If Nacra or Hobie tried it they'd probably get bombarded with expensive warranty claims...maybe.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #213335
06/10/10 02:26 AM
06/10/10 02:26 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 65
Vic, Australia
HJS Offline
journeyman
HJS  Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 65
Vic, Australia
Why not ASK Hobie and NACRA? Or is that too simple a solution.

We sit on this forum bouncing around a whole pile of theories instead of doing the obvious.

Not as simple as that [Re: ncik] #213342
06/10/10 05:13 AM
06/10/10 05:13 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Quote

Warranty of "light" boats is a potential business killer.



And that is why Hobie for example launches the 100kg iCat and why Nacra has done the A2 and A3 A-cats.

I think that if the above quote is true then they would never have launched either boats.

Wouter

Last edited by Wouter; 06/10/10 05:14 AM.

Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Not as simple as that [Re: Wouter] #213345
06/10/10 05:56 AM
06/10/10 05:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
Brisvegas
ACE11 Offline
member
ACE11  Offline
member

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
Brisvegas
Originally Posted by Wouter
Quote

Warranty of "light" boats is a potential business killer.



And that is why Hobie for example launches the 100kg iCat and why Nacra has done the A2 and A3 A-cats.

I think that if the above quote is true then they would never have launched either boats.

Wouter

Not sure of the point being made here. At 100kg the ICat is a pretty heavy boat if it wants to play in the A Class area. The A2 was marketed by Nacra but not the A3 as I understand it. Only one ever made it to AUS - not best suited to our generally higher wind and rougher water.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Arsailor] #213485
06/11/10 04:46 AM
06/11/10 04:46 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Cape Town, South Africa
Steve_Kwiksilver Offline
addict
Steve_Kwiksilver  Offline
addict

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Cape Town, South Africa
Kirt, I agree with most of what you have to say, but differ on this :
"THIS is why IMO what we, as F16 sailors, need to do is really help our current manufacturers- Support them ALL!! A little "ribbing" between brands is great and "I like my boat better because...." is helpful but bashing/criticizing OUR manufacturers, for any reason, is playing right into the hands of our "competition" for new/current sailors. All this derision about weight, etc. is playing right into their hands too IMO. It projects a vision of a fractionated, derisive class."

Firstly, I`m NOT an F16 owner, but an interested observer, just so you can see where I`m coming from. (ie a potential customer, given the right circumstances)
I think that all the heated debate regarding class rules, min. weight etc, are as a direct result of players OUTSIDE of F16 wanting to enter the game, and play it by their own rules.
I also see all the heated discussions regarding weight etc as being a COHESIVE force in the class - I have not seen ONE F16 sailor/owner agreeing with Macca or TA, they have all been very forceful in their defense of the F16 class, it`s rules and it`s method of running the class. Whether they are right or wrong remains to be seen, but they have a right to defend their stance, as they are the ones who have invested time, money and effort into the class, and who have the right to decide on it`s future growth potential (or lack thereof), as they bought into the concept of LIGHTWEIGHT 16ft racing boats. Changing that aspect of the class might detract from the attractiveness of the class and chase potential customers away.(Like me).
What I see is outsiders constantly making trouble, and F16 owners/ class members continually having to defend the class from these attacks.
Of course I agree that bashing any manufacturer in or out of the class does no-one any good. I do have strong reservations about whether the F16 class should WANT Hobie or Nacra to be involved in their class, I know very little about Nacra as an organisation, but I do know that Hobie has done catsailing and themselves no favour by alienating themselves from other sailors through their corporate attitude. I would hate it if that permeated the F16 class, and would see the entry of Hobie into the F16 class as a threat to it`s survival. If Macca`s opinions on these forums are anything to go by as a Nacra company representative, I believe the involvement of Nacra would only be worse.
If I`m mistaken, it would be a good idea if a Nacra company representative ask Macca to stop trying to enforce his belief system regarding what would be ""good" for F16 down our throats, or alternately inform the F16 class that Macca`s opinions do not reflect those of the Nacra company. If they were to do this, threads titled like this one would not be started. Macca has created a hatred of Nacra among F16 supporters which may not be well founded.
I also believe that the class rules will look after all involved - The Viper has fuller more bouyant hulls at the expense of weight. They COULD build the same boat lighter, at substantially increased cost, which is self-correcting as it would not sell as well. So a business decision has been forced by the class rules, one which Hobie and Nacra would also have to make in order to be competitive in the class (not only on the racecourse, but in volume of boats sold in order to be profitable. They must compete in PRICE with Stealth, Blade etc.) So I believe the F16 class rules allow for all schools of thought - lightweight lower volume hulls at min. weight, or fuller hulls at a slight weight penalty, evening out the playing field.
The problem with Formula classes is that some people want them to remain controlled development classes, while others would prefer them to migrate to being almost-one-design, similar to F18. I believe the F16 objectives when started were far more open, allowing similar boats with similar performance to race on a scratch basis. The Viper has at least shown that this is indeed possible, and are probably winning races more due to the highly skilled sailors and the refined rig, than any difference in hull shape, volume or stiffness of platforms contributes. If they traded boats with a mediocre sailor halfway through the regatta of a different make, they would probably still win, and the mediocre sailor would probably retain his position in the fleet. The boats have SIMILAR performance, enough so that weekend sailors needn`t worry about changing boats every season, or whenever the next best thing comes along.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Steve_Kwiksilver] #213486
06/11/10 05:54 AM
06/11/10 05:54 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
P
phill Offline

veteran
phill  Offline

veteran
P

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
Steve,
I stay away from this forum these days and only just happenned upon your post while filling in time waiting for a visitor to arrive. I'm just sick of the "F16 FREE RIDE WANTA BEES" telling everyone one else how to "suck eggs".
It is refreshing to see that someone with no axe to grind can see what is really going on.
The first good post that I've seen in quite a while- not that I look any more.

Life is short make the most of it.

Regards,
Phill


I know that the voices in my head aint real,
but they have some pretty good ideas.
There is no such thing as a quick fix and I've never had free lunch!

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: phill] #213487
06/11/10 06:41 AM
06/11/10 06:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
Steve:

" it would be a good idea if a Nacra company representative ask Macca to stop ".

This may have happened, who knows? In any case this forum has been civil for a few days, maybe it will remain so.

Phil: It was good to hear from you, hopefully you'll come back more often. I'm sure everyone would like to hear more about your home build.

Perhaps you could bring us up to date. On another thread...


Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #213489
06/11/10 07:03 AM
06/11/10 07:03 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
P
phill Offline

veteran
phill  Offline

veteran
P

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,449
Pete,
I took the Razor for a test sail a week or two back.
Does everything as expected- you would think it was on rails upwind, light and flighty off the breese.
I'm very happy with it.

Regards,
Phill

Last edited by phill; 06/11/10 07:11 AM.

I know that the voices in my head aint real,
but they have some pretty good ideas.
There is no such thing as a quick fix and I've never had free lunch!

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Steve_Kwiksilver] #213537
06/11/10 12:06 PM
06/11/10 12:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
scooby_simon Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
scooby_simon  Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
Originally Posted by Steve_Kwiksilver
Kirt, I agree with most of what you have to say, but differ on this :
"THIS is why IMO what we, as F16 sailors, need to do is really help our current manufacturers- Support them ALL!! A little "ribbing" between brands is great and "I like my boat better because...." is helpful but bashing/criticizing OUR manufacturers, for any reason, is playing right into the hands of our "competition" for new/current sailors. All this derision about weight, etc. is playing right into their hands too IMO. It projects a vision of a fractionated, derisive class."

Firstly, I`m NOT an F16 owner, but an interested observer, just so you can see where I`m coming from. (ie a potential customer, given the right circumstances)
I think that all the heated debate regarding class rules, min. weight etc, are as a direct result of players OUTSIDE of F16 wanting to enter the game, and play it by their own rules.
I also see all the heated discussions regarding weight etc as being a COHESIVE force in the class - I have not seen ONE F16 sailor/owner agreeing with Macca or TA, they have all been very forceful in their defense of the F16 class, it`s rules and it`s method of running the class. Whether they are right or wrong remains to be seen, but they have a right to defend their stance, as they are the ones who have invested time, money and effort into the class, and who have the right to decide on it`s future growth potential (or lack thereof), as they bought into the concept of LIGHTWEIGHT 16ft racing boats. Changing that aspect of the class might detract from the attractiveness of the class and chase potential customers away.(Like me).
What I see is outsiders constantly making trouble, and F16 owners/ class members continually having to defend the class from these attacks.
Of course I agree that bashing any manufacturer in or out of the class does no-one any good. I do have strong reservations about whether the F16 class should WANT Hobie or Nacra to be involved in their class, I know very little about Nacra as an organisation, but I do know that Hobie has done catsailing and themselves no favour by alienating themselves from other sailors through their corporate attitude. I would hate it if that permeated the F16 class, and would see the entry of Hobie into the F16 class as a threat to it`s survival. If Macca`s opinions on these forums are anything to go by as a Nacra company representative, I believe the involvement of Nacra would only be worse.
If I`m mistaken, it would be a good idea if a Nacra company representative ask Macca to stop trying to enforce his belief system regarding what would be ""good" for F16 down our throats, or alternately inform the F16 class that Macca`s opinions do not reflect those of the Nacra company. If they were to do this, threads titled like this one would not be started. Macca has created a hatred of Nacra among F16 supporters which may not be well founded.
I also believe that the class rules will look after all involved - The Viper has fuller more bouyant hulls at the expense of weight. They COULD build the same boat lighter, at substantially increased cost, which is self-correcting as it would not sell as well. So a business decision has been forced by the class rules, one which Hobie and Nacra would also have to make in order to be competitive in the class (not only on the racecourse, but in volume of boats sold in order to be profitable. They must compete in PRICE with Stealth, Blade etc.) So I believe the F16 class rules allow for all schools of thought - lightweight lower volume hulls at min. weight, or fuller hulls at a slight weight penalty, evening out the playing field.
The problem with Formula classes is that some people want them to remain controlled development classes, while others would prefer them to migrate to being almost-one-design, similar to F18. I believe the F16 objectives when started were far more open, allowing similar boats with similar performance to race on a scratch basis. The Viper has at least shown that this is indeed possible, and are probably winning races more due to the highly skilled sailors and the refined rig, than any difference in hull shape, volume or stiffness of platforms contributes. If they traded boats with a mediocre sailor halfway through the regatta of a different make, they would probably still win, and the mediocre sailor would probably retain his position in the fleet. The boats have SIMILAR performance, enough so that weekend sailors needn`t worry about changing boats every season, or whenever the next best thing comes along.


SPOT ON.


F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD

I also talk sport here
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: phill] #213545
06/11/10 02:36 PM
06/11/10 02:36 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Arsailor Offline
journeyman
Arsailor  Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Phill-
Looks very nice! Apparently a fairly easy homebuild since it's mainly "flat" panels? Presume that was one of the design objectives, or?
Guess this might be easy to build ala the LCD "A" cat method of foam panels w/ CF on both sides. What's she weigh ;-) ?

Kirt


Kirt
Taipan 4.9 USA 159, Flyer USA 185
Will sail for food...
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: scooby_simon] #213546
06/11/10 02:40 PM
06/11/10 02:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Arsailor Offline
journeyman
Arsailor  Offline
journeyman

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Arkansas, USA
Well, I guess I'll just agree that we disagree on what sort of view this type of discussion portrays to "outsiders' just jumping on this forum to see what the F16 class is all about. I'm not sure someone just jumping on would know who's an actual class member, a manufacturer, an interested potential buyer, an old member, etc. IMO most "newbies" entering this forum would presume that posters who seem to offer advice/opinions would be members/owners/manufacturers but perhaps I am being naive.

Kirt


Kirt
Taipan 4.9 USA 159, Flyer USA 185
Will sail for food...
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Arsailor] #213559
06/11/10 04:15 PM
06/11/10 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 126
Southampton UK
NacraKid Offline
member
NacraKid  Offline
member

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 126
Southampton UK
Another outsider view :P

Nacra could built a F16, but if they were to look on these forums they could be off put, most of the threads end up turing into fights bettween parties (parties that are not obviusly F16 or non F16 sailor) meaning that it gives the F16 class a look of friction between sailors and possibly a difficult class to deal with. Nacra could possibly go to AHPC and disscuss with them of setting up a new class of 120ish kg boats that they can both easily market and manufacture, and pgp's posts on the F18 forum will have not done the class any favours.

Before you start ripping me apart, if the UK youth catamran was still the Hobie 16 and not the Spitfire (which might fit in the rule actually) then I would seriuosly consider getting a F16 as I would have to get a 90kg crew to sail a F18!

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: NacraKid] #213561
06/11/10 04:25 PM
06/11/10 04:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
Hopefully no one will rip you apart. But this particular thread needs to go away.

Personally, I'd welcome your comments but in a new thread please.

Also, one of the "old hands" has suggested that a boat type and sail number in a posters signature block would be nice.

Thanks, have a nice weekend.


Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #213575
06/11/10 10:46 PM
06/11/10 10:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 465
FL
sail7seas Offline
addict
sail7seas  Offline
addict

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 465
FL
PLANNING?
My theory on why weight is not as critical on a F16 as on a Tornado,
is my F16 appears to me to be fastest when planning.
I have sailed heavy a Tornado 35lb over minimum and it was a dog.
In medium wind & up planning may be the equalizer?

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: sail7seas] #215563
07/08/10 01:12 PM
07/08/10 01:12 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,200
Vancouver, BC
Tornado Offline
veteran
Tornado  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,200
Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by sail7seas
PLANNING?
My theory on why weight is not as critical on a F16 as on a Tornado,
is my F16 appears to me to be fastest when planning.
I have sailed heavy a Tornado 35lb over minimum and it was a dog.
In medium wind & up planning may be the equalizer?


If that's the Tornado I'm thinking of, it was a dog for quite a few other reasons as well smirk


Last edited by Tornado; 07/08/10 01:13 PM.

Mike Dobbs
Tornado CAN 99 "Full Tilt"
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Tornado] #217472
08/12/10 11:40 PM
08/12/10 11:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 695
Ft. Pierce, Fl. USA
Seeker Offline
addict
Seeker  Offline
addict

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 695
Ft. Pierce, Fl. USA
Not trying to stir the pot up again, but I thought this was the best objective answer to the original question...like they say a picture is worth a thousand words...Couldn't help but think of this thread when I saw a picture Jake posted of the inside of a NACRA 20.
http://www.catsailor.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=217414#Post217414

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Seeker] #217477
08/13/10 06:24 AM
08/13/10 06:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Chicago, Illinois USA
TEH Offline
enthusiast
TEH  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Chicago, Illinois USA
I just happened to sit at the same table with Macca last night at dinner in Racine. The F16 topic came up and what he said seemed simple enough to me.

He feels that the rule set in F16 needs refinement (I think you all know his argument about a class killer) before Nacra jumps in and invests. We can argue all day about whether a class killer could/would be developed, but that is how he felt they viewed it. Risk versus reward.

I asked about the new 20 and the risk/reward equation and he said they had so many European pre-orders that it was put into production. He gave a couple of people at the dinner table a "tour" of a 20 hull they had on display. Big pricetag but looks to be an awesome boat. Certainly light weight. I could lift the hull with one hand. He said anyone who has test sailed it has bought it.


Blade F16 USA 725
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: TEH] #217479
08/13/10 07:05 AM
08/13/10 07:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
Wouter Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wouter  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582
North-West Europe
This is actually a brilliant example why he is so full of it.

Apparently a 20 foot with lifting foils and all carbon Nacra 20 sells like hot cakes and is alright, but an all-carbon F16 (with tighter limits to how it may be implemented) is a class killer according to him because it would be to expensive for most buyers.

Come to think of it. How would the current Nacra 20 owners regard this new all-carbon Nacra 20 ? Might they see it as a class killer ? (as in killing THEIR class)

If nacra can build and sell an A2/A3 A-cat, an All-Carbon Nacra 20 and a carbon masted F17 then they can certainly build a competitive (glass and alu) F16 if they want to. It is really not that hard when a poor conservative homebuilder like me can already get it down to 120 kg. The truth is that they just don't want to compete on a level playing field with other builders (or even amateur builders !).

In my opinion it is simply not the responsibility of a formula class to rewrite the rules to tilt the playing field more towards a particular schizophrenic boat builder. Some people apparently believe otherwise.

Now I don't piss on the boats he sails at every chance I get and I certainly hope that Macca has the same sense of well-manneredness.

Wouter

Last edited by Wouter; 08/13/10 07:11 AM.

Wouter Hijink
Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild)
The Netherlands
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: TEH] #217481
08/13/10 07:21 AM
08/13/10 07:21 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
Stewart Offline
old hand
Stewart  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
Ok.. ban Nacra, Hobie and Macca from building F16s.. should settle the issue.. crazy

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Stewart] #217482
08/13/10 07:47 AM
08/13/10 07:47 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
M
mikeborden Offline
addict
mikeborden  Offline
addict
M

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
I don't think the M20 is supposed to be an F class is it?

I think it's supposed to be a one-design Texel killer..an open portsmouth rocket ship! If that is the case, it really doesn't matter. Nacra and Hobie have a HISTORY of producing class killers of their OWN classes. This is just another iteration of building another boat that's "updated". Nacra has already given the middle finger to the 20 owners. You can't deny it's a nice boat, and it's fast, but it probably won't sell well here in the US. Not because of people being hesitant to go to a newer 20, but because of price, 30,000??? is that correct?


I know it's different in Europe, but here in the US, F16's are getting more and more questions. There hasn't been a new Nacra 20 sold in the Panhandle of Florida in a couple years, which has a BIG Nacra 20 fleet. And most of the new boats have been F16's. And, most of the Nacra 20 owners are asking about F16's.

I can see where he is coming from, and his opinion is STRONG, and he is entitled to it, just like all of us. Rather he is right or wrong is yet to be seen cause our class is relatively new. Yes, we can use some rule refinements, but that will come with age.


Just my OPINION so don't shoot me! smile


Mike

Last edited by mikeborden; 08/13/10 07:47 AM.

Viper USA 132

1984 Hobie 18
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mikeborden] #217486
08/13/10 08:36 AM
08/13/10 08:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
Stewart Offline
old hand
Stewart  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 953
Western Australia
mike.. water ballons at sunset!! If Im not there feel free to start without me!!! wink

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mikeborden] #217487
08/13/10 08:41 AM
08/13/10 08:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 443
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
bobcat Offline
addict
bobcat  Offline
addict

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 443
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
And I found it ironic that he who found it so important is sailing the second or third heaviest F18 in Racine. The boat weights are listed on the craw website.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: bobcat] #217489
08/13/10 10:23 AM
08/13/10 10:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 141
M
mini Offline
member
mini  Offline
member
M

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by bobcat
And I found it ironic that he who found it so important is sailing the second or third heaviest F18 in Racine. The boat weights are listed on the craw website.


It is what happens when you do not own the boats you sail sometimes.

You would think the factory would try to supply the best equipment - but just goes to show in the end it is the driver and for all the blustering about weight , it really means squat in the results.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mini] #217490
08/13/10 10:27 AM
08/13/10 10:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Jalani Offline
veteran
Jalani  Offline
veteran

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Bobocat, I took a look on the CRAW website but couldn't find the weights. Any chance of a link? Just interested in seeing the spread of F18 weights.


John Alani
___________
Stealth F16s GBR527 and GBR538
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Jalani] #217493
08/13/10 10:43 AM
08/13/10 10:43 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 549
Knokke-Heist - Belgium
Gilo Offline
addict
Gilo  Offline
addict

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 549
Knokke-Heist - Belgium


Falcon F16 - BEL666
Boats: TheBoatShop.be
Stories: bladef16.blogspot.com
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: ACE11] #217496
08/13/10 11:19 AM
08/13/10 11:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479
Thailand
Buccaneer Offline
veteran
Buccaneer  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479
Thailand
Well then piss off would be my advice..grin

Originally Posted by ACE11

A Class = too expensive
F18 = too heavy
F16 = too precious/argumentative
F14 = too few
F12 = too small


"House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals." – Ben Bernanke – 2005
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Wouter] #217501
08/13/10 12:09 PM
08/13/10 12:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 141
M
mini Offline
member
mini  Offline
member
M

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by Wouter
This is actually a brilliant example why he is so full of it.

Apparently a 20 foot with lifting foils and all carbon Nacra 20 sells like hot cakes and is alright, but an all-carbon F16 (with tighter limits to how it may be implemented) is a class killer according to him because it would be to expensive for most buyers.

Come to think of it. How would the current Nacra 20 owners regard this new all-carbon Nacra 20 ? Might they see it as a class killer ? (as in killing THEIR class)

If nacra can build and sell an A2/A3 A-cat, an All-Carbon Nacra 20 and a carbon masted F17 then they can certainly build a competitive (glass and alu) F16 if they want to. It is really not that hard when a poor conservative homebuilder like me can already get it down to 120 kg. The truth is that they just don't want to compete on a level playing field with other builders (or even amateur builders !).

In my opinion it is simply not the responsibility of a formula class to rewrite the rules to tilt the playing field more towards a particular schizophrenic boat builder. Some people apparently believe otherwise.

Now I don't piss on the boats he sails at every chance I get and I certainly hope that Macca has the same sense of well-manneredness.

Wouter


Nacra actually has a great opportunity to come in and build a min weight F16 and use their brand and marketing power. With a min weight boat they would totally trump the Viper and with their brand name should be able to overwhelm the small builders at the same time. They currently have their own issues and with having to switch to an Asian builder, there has to be some additional restrictions now to building “production quality” boats. Did you ask Macca where they build the new 20. I bet this has a bit to do with end cost too. I personally am not very excited about racing or especially owning a “performance” Daiwoo or Hyundai. I suppose though as only 1 of the Vipers sailed at the Euros was actually owned and not factory provided, if you are given a ride – you cannot complain.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mini] #217503
08/13/10 12:53 PM
08/13/10 12:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Jalani Offline
veteran
Jalani  Offline
veteran

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,382
Essex, UK
Thanks Gill!


John Alani
___________
Stealth F16s GBR527 and GBR538
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mikeborden] #217506
08/13/10 01:08 PM
08/13/10 01:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116
Annapolis, MD
Mark Schneider Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Mark Schneider  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116
Annapolis, MD
Originally Posted by mikeborden
I don't think the M20 is supposed to be an F class is it?
Mike


Correct There is no F class for 20 footers. Nacra calling their new 20 footer F20 is just marketing... there is no buy in from other builders to the box rule that just fits their boat. It's also not clear that at 20 feet... a box rule is even needed since physics limits what you can do. Racing the M20, and F20, boat for boat will probably depend on the crew and execution... not the design box.

Originally Posted by mikeborden

I think it's supposed to be a one-design Texel killer..an open portsmouth rocket ship! If that is the case, it really doesn't matter.
Mike


The M20 was designed to replace the Tornado for Olympic competition.... the idea was that on a WL course the sail configuration put a premium on Sailor Skill and that's what the Olympic competition was about... I was supposed to be a technically challenging boat to race. Since then... the actual buyers have modified and modified the rig to make the boat a distance racing machine (since there is no buoys circuit or a racing class for the M20's or the 20 footers in general). It is not one design by any stretch.

Originally Posted by mikeborden

Nacra and Hobie have a HISTORY of producing class killers of their OWN classes. This is just another iteration of building another boat that's "updated". Nacra has already given the middle finger to the 20 owners.
Mike


I completely disagree with this conclusion. The nacra 20 owners screwed themselves. The notion that the nacra 20 owners could do it all ... Week long ocean distance races AND a viable buoys racing circuit proved to not be the answer to forming and growing a one design class. No visible leadership apart from the factory running a NA's for 10 plus years will do that. With just barely enough critical mass for both pursuits the top sailors slowly exited the loosely organized owners group and joined the slowly growing F18 class. Notice, you have no doubt what the F18 class priorities are ...

The factory builds boats and organizes one week long event a year. When the numbers of boat sales and racers attending the NA's falls below some threshold... The factory class is all but dead.... Nacra moves on....

Originally Posted by mikeborden

You can't deny it's a nice boat, and it's fast, but it probably won't sell well here in the US. Not because of people being hesitant to go to a newer 20, but because of price, 30,000??? is that correct?
Mike

Your conclusion doesn't hold up. .... Melges built and promoted the Melges 20 in the last three years... It's a sport boat that is at least 40 to 50K. They already have more boats racing on a published schedule then any 20 foot catamaran in the world. The Viper 640 retooled with a new mast and a national race circuit and it's the sport boat class to be in the USA.

Owners buy into a PROGRAM... That would be boat plus race circuit. That's the take home of looking at the F18 in the USA... The boat is not fun under 10 knots (which is the vast majority of east coast sailing) yet the race program gets racers to buy in and go racing... (who cares if everyone on the water is going slow).

Originally Posted by mikeborden

I know it's different in Europe, but here in the US, F16's are getting more and more questions. There hasn't been a new Nacra 20 sold in the Panhandle of Florida in a couple years, which has a BIG Nacra 20 fleet. And most of the new boats have been F16's. And, most of the Nacra 20 owners are asking about F16's.

I can see where he is coming from, and his opinion is STRONG, and he is entitled to it, just like all of us. Rather he is right or wrong is yet to be seen cause our class is relatively new. Yes, we can use some rule refinements, but that will come with age.


Just my OPINION so don't shoot me! smile


Mike


I conclude that the remains of the nacra 20 class and beginnings of the F16 class are finding common ground at the level of recreational club racing. The 20 guys will down size or not when the crew issues get to the level of PIA. The challenge is to make a recreational club racing program as viable as possible... What that means is the big question for F16's (as well as the N20's).

IIMO, In the USA... the Nacra F20 sales will depend on how many owners want a boat to go distance racing and the viability of the distance races themselves. Several events have died (C100) or barely survived (Hogsbreath and it's successors)moreover, other events are looking at leadership succession in the next few years (Tybee and Steeplechase).

IMO, the N20's should see the writing on the wall and organize all of the 20's.. Tornado's, Supercats, Nacra's Marstorms and the new F20 on a distance circuit under a very loose formula rule/ measurement handicap rule. In order to keep everyone in the game for as long as possible, limit the number of new sails per year to be measured in.

IMO, The F16's should think about racing the single handers against the remains of the Nacra 17 fleet.... the competition is as much about managing the boat around the race course as strait line speed. The fantasy that the one up and two up F16's are fairly competing gets more extreme after each event. My hunch... after you look at the racing for single handers and double handers as separate issues the rules debate gets much easier.

Just my OPINION so don't shoot me! smile


crac.sailregattas.com
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Mark Schneider] #217510
08/13/10 01:21 PM
08/13/10 01:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
M
mikeborden Offline
addict
mikeborden  Offline
addict
M

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
HA!

You are correct that owner's do buy into a program, but(maybe it's the part of country I'm in or something) it seems that mulithull sailors in general don't want to spend as much as the other sailors. It least from what I can see!

You have a point on the singlehanded F17's and F16's, but quite honest, I believe we have tried that in the past. I'm thinking what we might want to do is some type of a race somewhere that's singlehanders only. Kind of what they do in Europe with the "One Up Cup". That would also include A-cats also. I know, you guys probably wouldn't come, cause you guys like to play in your own sandbox sometimes, but at least we would invite you! . smile Notice, I'm smiling, being funny, not serious! smile

I won't shoot you! ....


smile


Mike



Viper USA 132

1984 Hobie 18
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mikeborden] #217522
08/13/10 01:59 PM
08/13/10 01:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 606
Maryland
Kris Hathaway Offline
addict
Kris Hathaway  Offline
addict

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 606
Maryland
Whoa!!!! This thread just took a port tack. Start a new one if you must.


Kris Hathaway
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Kris Hathaway] #217524
08/13/10 02:08 PM
08/13/10 02:08 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
M
mikeborden Offline
addict
mikeborden  Offline
addict
M

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
That's what we are good at! smile

I'm done anyway....

Ready for the Friday afternooner. smile



Viper USA 132

1984 Hobie 18
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Kris Hathaway] #217527
08/13/10 02:26 PM
08/13/10 02:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 606
Maryland
Kris Hathaway Offline
addict
Kris Hathaway  Offline
addict

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 606
Maryland
Nacra and Hobie probably can compete in the F16 Class; however, they would disenfranchise their existing SMOD classes that are "closely" similar, FX-1 & F17. It is only recently that the F16 class has gained any real momentum and it would have been schizophrenic if they jumped in before now. Frankly, I hear very little hype about the FX-1 & F17 anymore and expect that it is an indication of some F16 surprises in the near future.

Whatever the case, it seems as though formula beachcat racing has a strong appeal for the owner and it is here to stay. Ben Franklin promoted "Join, or Die". It may be applicable.

[Linked Image]


Kris Hathaway
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Kris Hathaway] #217533
08/13/10 03:30 PM
08/13/10 03:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
M
mikeborden Offline
addict
mikeborden  Offline
addict
M

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
I like that...ole Ben Franklin....


smile


Viper USA 132

1984 Hobie 18
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Kris Hathaway] #217534
08/13/10 03:35 PM
08/13/10 03:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116
Annapolis, MD
Mark Schneider Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Mark Schneider  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116
Annapolis, MD
Kris

Take a look at the US scene.... the FX-1 never took off as a racing class... The Hobie 17 sailors took a look and said... no thanks.... A racing core never materialized....

The Nacra F17 basically died a year ago... They have one boat at NA's this year... just to the left of Michigan were they started! Hell... Two or three years ago... they were running a gold cup championship series with 17 racers. Bob Curry was spearheading the class.

In the USA... there are no fleets to support or kill.

The EU scene is different... The F104 class in France and it's relationship to F16's two up is one of Macca's points. ...

The one up scene looks (from here) to be mostly a local club scene. That's a good question for the EU guys... What is the level of participation for one up spin sailors in the EU. I wonder how much of a market there is for a single handed spin cat racing program.


crac.sailregattas.com
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: bobcat] #217543
08/13/10 08:40 PM
08/13/10 08:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Chicago, Illinois USA
TEH Offline
enthusiast
TEH  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Chicago, Illinois USA
Bobcat, it was a borrowed boat from a CRAW member. His sails and some modifications to the rigging.


Blade F16 USA 725
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Mark Schneider] #217562
08/14/10 05:07 PM
08/14/10 05:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 893
W
waynemarlow Offline
old hand
waynemarlow  Offline
old hand
W

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Mark Schneider

The one up scene looks (from here) to be mostly a local club scene. That's a good question for the EU guys... What is the level of participation for one up spin sailors in the EU. I wonder how much of a market there is for a single handed spin cat racing program.


For every club sailor, how many of those travel to events other than their own puddle, without a proper survey I guess I could use the F16 park at Datchet with 11 boats, only 1 has travelled to an outside event this year and i would guess that is about the norm.

In my view this is exactly where the manufacturers get it wrong, which market should they sell to, the clubman who often doesn't race or the clubman who races regulalry. At 11 : 1 it is a marketing no brainer but unless they can get the publicity from winning races then the clubman won't buy the product as they need to aspire to own the latest all singing and dancing toy.

As to EU preference to one or two crew, probably a very high number are sailed solo with an occasional crew for comps, sort of the other way around to the States.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: NacraKid] #217743
08/17/10 04:51 PM
08/17/10 04:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,118
Northfield Mn
Karl_Brogger Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Karl_Brogger  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,118
Northfield Mn
There were lots of rumors at Racine that NACRA will be building an F16. I didn't hear it from anyone that had genuine, first hand knowledge though, so chances are its the deep fried mouse story where it always happened to somebody else.

I hope they do, another boat on the market can't hurt anything in my opinion, hopefully its an improvement over what is currently available and it keeps pushing the ball forward.


I'm boatless.
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Karl_Brogger] #217745
08/17/10 05:13 PM
08/17/10 05:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Chicago, Illinois USA
TEH Offline
enthusiast
TEH  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Chicago, Illinois USA
I don't know why somebody didn't ask Jack (?) from Nacra about this. He was there all week.


Blade F16 USA 725
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: TEH] #217746
08/17/10 05:35 PM
08/17/10 05:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,118
Northfield Mn
Karl_Brogger Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Karl_Brogger  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,118
Northfield Mn
That'd be waaaaayyy too simple....


I'm boatless.
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Wouter] #220827
10/05/10 01:18 AM
10/05/10 01:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 22
N
Nacrasailor Offline
stranger
Nacrasailor  Offline
stranger
N

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 22
a little bird told me that the same design team who did the Nacra F20C is working on a F16...the word is that it will be as spectacular as the F20C

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Nacrasailor] #220828
10/05/10 03:47 AM
10/05/10 03:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 893
W
waynemarlow Offline
old hand
waynemarlow  Offline
old hand
W

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 893
Perhaps my musings that a mixed crew F16 boat being the only way we get multihulls back into the Olympics and the agreement by some of the Sailing press, is perhaps sharpening the minds of the marketing boys and girls at the major manufacturers. cool

Last edited by waynemarlow; 10/05/10 03:48 AM.
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: Nacrasailor] #220842
10/05/10 07:45 AM
10/05/10 07:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
M
mikeborden Offline
addict
mikeborden  Offline
addict
M

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
Originally Posted by Nacrasailor
a little bird told me that the same design team who did the Nacra F20C is working on a F16...the word is that it will be as spectacular as the F20C


Great!

That just means it will NOT be F16 compliant, but trying to create their own class that's called F something....


Good marketing! smile

Mike


Viper USA 132

1984 Hobie 18
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #220844
10/05/10 07:53 AM
10/05/10 07:53 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
M
mikeborden Offline
addict
mikeborden  Offline
addict
M

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Memphis, TN
I know...

But the truth hurts and I'm not stirring up poop. smile

I'll believe it when I see one! smile

Mike


Viper USA 132

1984 Hobie 18
Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: pgp] #220846
10/05/10 07:59 AM
10/05/10 07:59 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 893
W
waynemarlow Offline
old hand
waynemarlow  Offline
old hand
W

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by pgp

Wayne if you're lonely get a puppy!


Pete how do you constantly mis-interpret everything we all seem to say, where I come from its called not doing your homework properly and jumping to the wrong conclusions.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: waynemarlow] #220851
10/05/10 08:25 AM
10/05/10 08:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 141
M
mini Offline
member
mini  Offline
member
M

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by waynemarlow
Originally Posted by pgp

Wayne if you're lonely get a puppy!


Pete how do you constantly mis-interpret everything we all seem to say, where I come from its called not doing your homework properly and jumping to the wrong conclusions.


Pete,

You do not have much room to gripe on anyone else’s posts relative to being a friendly representative of the class.

With the 104 seeming to die on the vine, I would think Nacra would be interested in the potential market share the F16 class seems to be tapping. They do have a very long history of F’n up classes though you have to admit (Pun intended)

There is room to do some cool things within the framework of the rules, so it will be interesting how they choose to use that potential. Maybe we will see that 30K class killer Macca keeps droning about. Maybe they will pull a Viper move and build something away from the box edges and then lobby the class to change the rules.

Some added marketing power can be a very good thing for the class. Let’s hope the resulting product is a representative of that and not an ego swing to create yet another new thing.

Re: Why can't Nacra compete in F16 [Re: mini] #220868
10/05/10 10:41 AM
10/05/10 10:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
pgp Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
pgp  Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525
blush I know. But I thought we had turned the corner on that. Things have been amiable for awhile now. I began this thread in direct retaliation for unwarranted attacks on the F16 Class. Those attacks have stopped, so should this thread.


Pete Pollard
Blade 702

'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Damon Linkous, phill, Rolf_Nilsen 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 675 guests, and 102 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,405
Posts267,056
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1