Announcements
New Discussions
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation #241779
12/22/11 06:59 AM
12/22/11 06:59 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,884
Detroit, MI
mbounds Offline OP
Pooh-Bah
mbounds  Offline OP
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,884
Detroit, MI
Clicky

Quote
ISAF is pleased to announce the venue and date for the equipment evaluation for the 2016 Olympic Women's Skiff and Mixed Multihull.
The evaluation will be held from 17 to 25 March 2012 at Prince Felipe High Performance Sailing Centre, Santander, Spain.

Participants will be asked to provide two complete boats at the venue. Preliminary documentation along with Notice of Intent to participate and application fee shall be supplied to ISAF by 20 January 2012.

Guidelines on the Proposals Process can be found here
+ Women's Two Person Skiff
+ Mixed Multihull

Response from ISAF with an invitation to participate will be sent to the manufacturer/supplier teams as early as possible and no later than 20 February 2012.

-- Have You Seen This? --
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241780
12/22/11 07:35 AM
12/22/11 07:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 402
Punta Gorda, FL
J
jkkartz1 Offline
addict
jkkartz1  Offline
addict
J

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 402
Punta Gorda, FL
The application fee is 600 GBP=$940.00

Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241783
12/22/11 08:56 AM
12/22/11 08:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,490
On the Water
P.M. Offline
Pooh-Bah
P.M.  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,490
On the Water
4.(a)
-Two part mast

-Able to be shipped in a 6.1m (20 ft.) container


Philip
USA #1006
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: P.M.] #241785
12/22/11 09:45 AM
12/22/11 09:45 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 285
C
Catfan Offline
enthusiast
Catfan  Offline
enthusiast
C

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 285
Does anyone know which manufacturers sent (are going to send) their application, besides AHPC (Viper), Nacra (F16), Roland Gabler (Tornado), Alex Oudin/Martin Fisher (for the Phantom 18, a lightened F18)?

Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: Catfan] #241788
12/22/11 10:53 AM
12/22/11 10:53 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,658
Florida Suncoast, Dunedin Caus...
catman Offline
Pooh-Bah
catman  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,658
Florida Suncoast, Dunedin Caus...
Should anyone really care?


Have Fun
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241789
12/22/11 10:55 AM
12/22/11 10:55 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969
B
brucat Offline
Carpal Tunnel
brucat  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969
For pure entertainment value, sure.

Who here is directly affected by the equipment choice?

Mike

Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241793
12/22/11 01:25 PM
12/22/11 01:25 PM

X
xanderwess
Unregistered
xanderwess
Unregistered
X



Well, if they pick the Wave I am pretty sure we'll pick up a sh!t-ton more sailors in the racing groups........

Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241794
12/22/11 02:20 PM
12/22/11 02:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,430
california
F-18 5150 Offline
veteran
F-18 5150  Offline
veteran

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,430
california
Really a two person Wave. Come on Chris your better than that.


Richard Vilvens
Brand Ambassador
PSA Capricorn USA
R.Vilvens@yahoo.com
Fairfield, Ca
F-18 5150

http://www.capricornsailing.com/
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241796
12/22/11 03:33 PM
12/22/11 03:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,118
Northfield Mn
Karl_Brogger Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Karl_Brogger  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,118
Northfield Mn
No he isn't.


I'm boatless.
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: brucat] #241802
12/22/11 07:38 PM
12/22/11 07:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217
Palm Harbor, FL
daniel_t Offline
enthusiast
daniel_t  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217
Palm Harbor, FL
Originally Posted by brucat
Who here is directly affected by the equipment choice?


My guess is that anybody who currently has a boat that is picked, and anybody who wants to buy the kind of boat that happens to get picked.


Daniel T.
Taipan F16 - USA 213
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241804
12/22/11 09:27 PM
12/22/11 09:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969
B
brucat Offline
Carpal Tunnel
brucat  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969
That seems quite INdirect to me...

To me, direct would be if the equipment that is picked excludes you from a campaign you were actively planning on doing. While there is no shortage of people here that will swear the sky is falling at times (as various announcements are made), the number of people here directly affected is less than one hand, perhaps less than one finger.

Direct/indirect/no impact are decisions we make daily at work. Same logic applies here.

Mike

Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: brucat] #241810
12/23/11 09:10 AM
12/23/11 09:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217
Palm Harbor, FL
daniel_t Offline
enthusiast
daniel_t  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217
Palm Harbor, FL
Originally Posted by brucat
Direct/indirect/no impact are decisions we make daily at work. Same logic applies here.


Wow, such a restrictive definition of "direct." In that case, the olympic committee's choice impacts me more directly than most of what I hear in the news.

I think it is safe to say that direct vs indirect is not a dichotomy, there are varying degrees of directness and we don't have to agree on where the line is drawn.


Daniel T.
Taipan F16 - USA 213
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241831
12/23/11 09:00 PM
12/23/11 09:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969
B
brucat Offline
Carpal Tunnel
brucat  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,969
In my (heavily regulated) industry, direct vs. indirect is absolutely a dichotomy. There are degrees within indirect.

This is acutally a good thing, it makes other decisions much easier to make.

Mike

Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: mbounds] #241832
12/24/11 12:03 AM
12/24/11 12:03 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,430
california
F-18 5150 Offline
veteran
F-18 5150  Offline
veteran

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,430
california
I hope the Tiger is chosen as the O-class and made illegal to run in the F-18 series. Then I would have to buy a new boat to run F-18 on.


Richard Vilvens
Brand Ambassador
PSA Capricorn USA
R.Vilvens@yahoo.com
Fairfield, Ca
F-18 5150

http://www.capricornsailing.com/
Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation [Re: ] #241846
12/24/11 10:34 PM
12/24/11 10:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 894
Branford, CT
rhodysail Offline
old hand
rhodysail  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 894
Branford, CT
Originally Posted by xanderwess
Well, if they pick the Wave I am pretty sure we'll pick up a sh!t-ton more sailors in the racing groups........


I think it would have the opposite effect, after an initial spike in Wave sailors in the first quadrennium you would see a big drop with a net loss in the number of Wave sailors by the second quad. Historically that’s the way things tend to go.


Moderated by  Damon Linkous 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 420 guests, and 79 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,404
Posts267,055
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
--Advertisement--
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1