| Deciding between a '93 H18sx or a '00 Nacra 6.0 #27519 01/04/04 01:28 PM 01/04/04 01:28 PM |
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 54 PA, Bucks Nieuwkerk OP
journeyman
|
OP
journeyman
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 54 PA, Bucks | I have sailed my whole life (mostly monohulls). Two years ago I purchased a 1985 Hobie 17 to go sailing with my son. Unfortunately I can really only use it single-handidly since I weigh 210 lbs and he is 190 and growing. First of all, with that much weight on a H17, it kills performance. Secondly, it doesn't leave much room for my other 2 children!
So I'm in the market for a cat (with a jib) that can easily carry my family. While I have never raced, my son and I would also like to start competing. So having a boat that performs well would be nice. Over the next 2 years, I expect to race (in the Philly area) about 30-40% of the time, and use the boat recreationally 60-70%.
I have my sights on a 1993 H18SX, but am also interested in a Nacra 6.0 built in 2000. The Nacra is about $500 more.
I'm interested in hearing from other sailors that sail most recreationally, but sometimes compete. What do you think would make the most sense for us? Would the Nacra be too much boat? Is it too delicate for recreational sailing? How about the TheMightyHobie18? Can it carry 4 people well? Is it too dated for racing?
I would appreciate any and all feedback - Thank You!
| | | Re: Deciding between a '93 H18sx or a '00 Nacra 6.0
[Re: Nieuwkerk]
#27520 01/04/04 05:20 PM 01/04/04 05:20 PM |
Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 330 srm
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 330 | Either the Nacra 6.0 or the Hobie 18SX would be a good choice considering your size and number of crew. I've never sailed a Nacra 6.0, but I have a lot of time on a standard Hobie 18 and Hobie 20 (similar to N6.0). I would say at your and your son's size, bigger is better. Even though the SX18 has a slightly larger rig than a standard 18, I think you're still going to be a little bogged down, especialy if you are sailing with 3 or 4 big people. The Nacra is probably a bit floatier. Also, at only $500 more and 7 years newer, unless the thing has been run over by a cement truck, the 6.0 is probably the way to go. As for racing, either one of these boats would almost certainly be raced in the handicaped fleet because there aren't many of either in your area. There is a small but active group of standard (non-SX) TheMightyHobie18 racers that race in the area. And there's a fairly large and active hobie fleet right in your area, up a Lake Nockamixon, fleet 416 which you might check out. | | | Re: Deciding between a '93 H18sx or a '00 Nacra 6.
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#27522 01/04/04 07:11 PM 01/04/04 07:11 PM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... Mary
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... | I agree about the Nacra being the only choice between those two, considering the number of people and the weight you are going to be putting on the boat. I just want to add that there is nothing "delicate" about the Nacra 6.0. It is a very strong, well-built boat. And, even though you are used to monohulls, you will find the Nacra 6.0 very responsive and very easy to tack. | | | Re: Deciding between a '93 H18sx or a '00 Nacra 6.0
[Re: Nieuwkerk]
#27523 01/04/04 07:47 PM 01/04/04 07:47 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 290 Pensacola, Florida / Katy, Tex... Cookie Monster
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 290 Pensacola, Florida / Katy, Tex... | No contest. Nacra 6.0 is the better boat for you. Like posted earlier, unless the 6.0 has been abused, it is most definitely worth $500 more than the Hobie 18SX that is 7 years older. I still have my 1992 Nacra 6.0 and still race it occasionally when not on the ARC. I weigh 240# amd my crew is at 200#. When we double trap, it is blowing, and we go fast!. The boat handles the weight with no problem. We've cruised on it with 5 adults, but that is certainly not the norm.
Buy the Nacra 6.0 and don't look back. It will race, cruise, and like Mary said, it is not fragile to say the least.
Just my 2 cents.
Don Cook
ARC22 #2226
ADRENALIN
| | | Re: Deciding between a '93 H18sx or a '00 Nacra 6.0
[Re: Cookie Monster]
#27524 01/04/04 08:37 PM 01/04/04 08:37 PM |
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 118 St. Louis, MO JoeLeonard
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 118 St. Louis, MO | I spent last summer sailing a TheMightyHobie18 and purchased a N6.0 by the end of the season....the 18 was not an SX, but from what I know about the sx, I think my experience on the 18 Magnum should translate closely. I think everyone else here is giving you good advice so far. THe dif between the two boats is quite significant. If you had little or no sailing experience, I would point you to the Hobie 18 as it is a much more docile boat, however....your weight (especially with your crew) will be a significant problem. The N6.0 has a lot more bouyancy and can handle the weight. As far as performance, when I moved to the 6.0 it was like going from a chevy to a porche!! One thing to be aware of though is that the 6.o having been built as a performance boat will not take as much abuse (running it up on the beach) as the 18 (which is a tank!!). Given what you have said, I would definitely go with the Nacra and although it has a lot more controls, many of them you can just set at max de-powered (so-to-speak) while you learn the boat and then pick them up as you get comfortable. I would also recommend putting a jib furler on if it does not have one already so if you find yourself in a tough situation with heavy wind you can furl it while on the water to depower more.
Good luck, and hope to see you on the race course!!
Joe
JL
N20 # 1041 "Lucille"
A-cat USA 44
| | | Re: Deciding between a '93 H18sx or a '00 Nacra 6.0
[Re: Nieuwkerk]
#27526 01/04/04 11:26 PM 01/04/04 11:26 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | New England is the strong hold for the Nacra 6.0NA...not too far from you (at least not as far as for me!). The 18sx is rated slower than the regular 18 - even WITH the spinnaker on the SX! I had a Hobie 18 and it's a great boat but the 6.0 is king of handling crew weight and like everyone else said, $500 difference for a 7 year newer boat is a no brainer.
Jake Kohl | | | now, now... we do not "hate..."
[Re: MauganN20]
#27530 01/05/04 11:18 AM 01/05/04 11:18 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,293 Long Beach, California John Williams
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293 Long Beach, California | Dude - I don't think it's a anti-Hobie thing at all, and I hope you don't either. There's a HUGE difference between these two particular boats, and $500 is not much money for the jump to the newer one... even through we don't know the prices the guy's working with. And I'm sure we all meant to welcome him to area sailing events regardless of the brand he chooses. It's tough enough to get new folks into the scene without tacit participation barriers. Happy to say we got a new Hobie 16 sailor from New Mexico here in the Panhandle last week.
John Williams
- The harder you practice, the luckier you get - Gary Player, pro golfer
After watching Lionel Messi play, I realize I need to sail harder.
| | | ARC and N6.0
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#27532 01/05/04 03:00 PM 01/05/04 03:00 PM |
Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL waterbug_wpb
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL | If you're asking the difference between the ARC boats and the Nacra boats, there is plenty. Beam width (12' for ARC 20 and 22 vs. 8'6" for Nacra) immediately comes to mind. That's huge when it comes to handling weather, as well as square footage for the family (cooler, radio, etc.). The only drawback is that you can't trailer something 12' wide, so you would have to assemble it if you travel a lot.
As you can see, a well sailed ARC is competitive (BRoberts won Steeplechase two weeks ago) in distance (and has a "sweet" rating), and is (according to the designer's view) built solid (the hole in that red one at Steeplechase notwithstanding - no boat is bulletproof).
Not much of a fleet of ARC here in FL, but they are out there...
Jay
| | | ARC fleet
[Re: Cookie Monster]
#27534 01/05/04 03:31 PM 01/05/04 03:31 PM |
Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL waterbug_wpb
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,590 Naples, FL | You need to talk my "neighbor" into getting his ARC 22 over to the Mug Race! You guys going to have a fleet there this year?
Jay
| | | Re: ARC and N6.0
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#27537 01/05/04 07:15 PM 01/05/04 07:15 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 290 Pensacola, Florida / Katy, Tex... Cookie Monster
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 290 Pensacola, Florida / Katy, Tex... | Pitchpole Dave,
Not sure what you're looking for here specifically, but I'd be glad to answer any question that I could about the boat. I've been on it a little over a year. As far as good points, there are many for me. The deck is clean, and the layout is fantastic. There is one jib sheet and one line for the main traveler. Both exit at the front crossbeam at the base of the mast. The crew takes care of both and can run them both trapped out. In fact, the skipper never has to touch the mainsheet. Once it's sheeted in the traveler takes care of all the de-powering. This system works great. All lines are run underneath the tramp out of the way. We've ran 20 miles double trapped at 22-23 knots and never missed a beat. The boat has a 12 foot beam, so you can imagine the room. We are two big guys and never run into each other like we do on the Nacra. It has a self tacking jib, so there is no adjustment going up wind. It helps to roll tack it. This boat also weighs less than the Nacra 6.0. Come to think of it, we weigh more than the boat. Handling? Well, like a Cadillac. Bad points - none for me, although I'm sure others will complain about set up and take down time. Yes, you do have to disassemble the crossbeams to get it on the trailer, but that doesn't bother me. By two people that know what they're doing, this time can be minimized. It usually takes about 1 1/2 hours +/- each way. A little less to take down.
Hope this helps.
Don Cook
ARC22 #2226
ADRENALIN
| | | Re: ARC and N6.0
[Re: Cookie Monster]
#27538 01/05/04 11:08 PM 01/05/04 11:08 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | The minimum weight for the ARC22 specified is 5 lbs less than the 6.0's specified actual weight (415 and 420lbs) - I'm not sure how correct the terminology is on the websites. While I would be surprised if either weighed to these specs, it would be interesting to see where both boats actually came out - have you weighed your ARC22?
Jake
Jake Kohl | | |
|
0 registered members (),
285
guests, and 52
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,062 Members8,150 | Most Online4,027 Jul 30th, 2025 | | |