| Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: WindyHillF20]
#73356 04/24/06 12:04 PM 04/24/06 12:04 PM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 829 Charleston, SC NCSUtrey
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 829 Charleston, SC | For all the money you'll spend on doing this conversion, you'd be much better off just selling the 18 and buying an F18, Tiger, or the like. If you want a bigger boat, then a Nacra 20 would fit the bill as well. Also, you'll have an actual fleet to race against with the F18's. I have all the stuff for the conversion, including an F18 spinnaker, spin pole, and midpole snuffer (hand made), so I know what goes into it. We had it on a Nacra 5.5. It takes quite a bit of effort and money to do this conversion, and in the end just buying a boat built for a spin is the way to go! Anyway, didn't you just sell the fox?
Trey
| | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: WindyHillF20]
#73361 04/24/06 02:56 PM 04/24/06 02:56 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | Trey, believe it or not NO! I am still trying to sell it, have several offers, but no money yet. I am a beach sailor as you know and none of the new spin boats can take the sand. I sail up and down the coast and with a spin that trip is more fun and faster. The 18 is more durable and with the wings more comfortable. I don't plan to ever race again so how I set up the spin is unimportant. Do you have everything I need, thought Soloman bought your setup for his 16. Thanks, Michael What gives? Why are you hanging it up? You know it's not the clamshell construction but the brand of boat that is having difficulty with the sand. The Nacra 5.0 through the 6.0 have a great history in the sand - the I20 is no slouch either. In my opinion, a Hobie 18 would convert OK to a spinnaker but if you really did mean "F18", it's notable that the curved beams on the TheMightyHobie18 are not F18 legal....but I think you meant more about adding a chute. You may start by referencing the dimensions on the 18 Magnum but I believe it was a bit of an underachiever.
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: Jake]
#73362 04/24/06 03:19 PM 04/24/06 03:19 PM |
Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 1,187 38.912, -95.37 _flatlander_
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,187 38.912, -95.37 | The 18, especially with Magnum wings, is a hell of a cruiser (USN). If my boys weren't so hell bent for racing I wouldn't sell mine. I know when they're gone I'll wish I still had it, a great boat for two couples, but a real pig downwind. I totally relate to the want of the spinnaker...go for it!
Maughan, touche on the board trunks, can't dispute that.
John H16, H14
| | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: WindyHillF20]
#73364 04/24/06 11:03 PM 04/24/06 11:03 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD Keith
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD | 18 with a chute is fun. Good addition for fun sailing. I ran a 12.5' pole, was advised not to go more than 13. 12.5 felt right. If you don't want to sheet to the back beam, look for a newer design high aspect kite. The original SX chute was old style, too much foot to it to sheet anywhere but the beam. A newer F18 chute should have a shorter foot. You can get the main stuff new and spend the cash, or you can shop the Tiger guys for used race gear that is still good for cruising and save a bunch. i just sold all my stuff for $450. I didn't have a square top but I'm guessing that would be a great addition. If you have the original molded plastic rudders, ditch them for some EPOs or a set of new racing blades. Expensive, but well worth the improvement in helm. For those that say the boat is a dog downwind - your mast is raked too far back. Rake killed the downwind performance on mine. Mast all the way forward gave great all around performance. Only time to rake was when it blew big time. | | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: WindyHillF20]
#73365 04/24/06 11:27 PM 04/24/06 11:27 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 425 Toledo, Ohio (western end of ... Mike Fahle
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 425 Toledo, Ohio (western end of ... | I had a Hobie 18 for 19 years. The sails were seriously under-developed. Back before spinnakers were common, I cut the top off a full, mylar, Mystere 6.0 mainsail for the Hobie 18 and the infamous "Mystobie" was born (I made a combined class logo for the sail)! I lost only a few square feet of sail area with a new big fathead sail (I even made a cut out in the head board to gain a few more inches of hoist) and the 18 suddenly would beat any 18 or 20 foot sloop rigged boat in light or medium wind boat for boat. It was very noticeably faster.
Try that option before going to all the trouble with a spinnaker. It is worth it because you always use the main so you get the most bang for your buck and you do not have to change anything. Cutting the top off a bigger sail is the way to go. The class sails were always poorly made, too flat, and of dacron material. Shortly before Hobie quit making the boat, they came out with much nicer sails that made the boat a little faster (doncha just love "strict one design"?) The boat has much more speed potential but was hampered with no "engine" development due to class rule restrictions. So this development makes a big difference, is easy to do, easy to handle, and a good value. | | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#73368 04/25/06 08:57 AM 04/25/06 08:57 AM |
Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 1,187 38.912, -95.37 _flatlander_
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,187 38.912, -95.37 | Keith, That was me or I am "those", look at your picture, the 18 just sits down. Comparitively speaking it is not a bouyant hull design. Don't get me wrong, I loved passing H20 sailors upwind on an old beater, but when you round the weather mark they're gone.
John H16, H14
| | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: Dan_Delave]
#73370 04/25/06 10:35 AM 04/25/06 10:35 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | You may want to check the hoist height before putting an F18 chute on a Hobie 18. F18 mast height is about 28.5' or so and the spinnaker runs only a couple of feet shy of that. I would be a little concerned about doing that to a comptip mast ... but if yours is still aluminum it will probably be OK (as long as the mast height is similar - otherwise you will end up with a masthead spinnaker!).
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: Dan_Delave]
#73372 04/25/06 11:06 AM 04/25/06 11:06 AM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 829 Charleston, SC NCSUtrey
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 829 Charleston, SC | I've got a used 18sx mast here in Raleigh if you decide to go with a bigger mast for the tiger main.
Trey
| | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: Jake]
#73373 04/25/06 11:39 AM 04/25/06 11:39 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 440 Graham, NC WindyHillF20 OP
addict
|
OP
addict
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 440 Graham, NC | Dan and Jake, No comptip crap, all aluminum. Couldn't I have the Tiger chute cut down? Super Sails can make a spin for $500 based on 18sx specs, maybe should use Tiger specs and shorten height. Trey, changing the mast would mean changing all standing rigging and a new main sail, not sure the extra height is worth it. Sold the Fox, gave it away for 5k. Also, would a dacron square top main make any noticable difference in speed. On the ocean 10kt wind is common, 20kt many afternoons and when the small craft advisory is issued its time to raise the sails. Thanks for all the input!!! | | | Re: Hobie 18/F18 conversion
[Re: _flatlander_]
#73374 04/25/06 11:55 AM 04/25/06 11:55 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD Keith
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD | Keith, That was me or I am "those", look at your picture, the 18 just sits down. Comparitively speaking it is not a bouyant hull design. Don't get me wrong, I loved passing H20 sailors upwind on an old beater, but when you round the weather mark they're gone. The 18 does seem to sit deep in the water - the hulls have very little freeboard and the boat is terrible stern dragger. If you race with heavy crew weight the problem is even worse. I usually top 200lbs, and I found that this boat wanted to be lighter no matter what the conditions. Anyway the three rules to make it work were - weight forward, weight forward, weight forward. If you have conditions that involve any waves, you'll be smacking the tramp and crossbeams, and getting the wonderful hull lip in the water which is drag city. But... If you keep the weight forward and the rig forward and get the wild thing going you will piss off some other boats. I ran my 18 for quite a few years in our Portsmouth Fleet and took a bunch of trophies home. I only ran the spin the last year I had it. Without the spin there were days when I hung with the local Prindle-19 (no slouch) and others going downwind. In breeze that meant having the crew to leeward at the front crossbeam playing his weight for and aft as the boat needed, and me sitting in the middle of the tramp or back if the wind was up. Really had to pay attention to getting in sync with the waves or you sit on them and go slow - head up to catch the wave crest, head down to surf, head up before you park in the next one. That having been said, I would not expect to go boat for boat with a 20 unless you have good breeze and flat water. If you're passing H-20s upwind and choking downwind, I believe you have too much mast rake. I could realy feel this - the worst were days when I thought the wind would blow and I'd rake, only to have it go light be left without any downwind speed at all. I even unraked the mast once on the water during a light air race once to undo the pain. Run the mast all the forward. You'll lose some upwind performance, but the downwind will come back to you. With the spin I found I could roll the faster non-spin boats downwind, and then they'd have to catch me going upwind, only for me to get them again on the next downwind leg. It was a great way to put a slower boat right in the middle of the 5.8s, P-19s and such. Also - if you're sailing with old sails, get a new set of sails from Hobie at the very least. The new set I got were awesome, really woke the boat up from the old set. If you go non-Hobie get a decent sailmaker and do a flat top. From my experience the after market sails that claimed to be just like stock were not, and in fact had less sail area (I can send some pics to prove that) and different batten configuration. Also - I've said too many times, but if you have the molded rudders ditch them as fast as can. Even if you are recreational sailing. I can't believe these were ever sold on these boats. You can grab the tip and deflect them by hand. I actually spun the boat out as they flexed under the load of gust going downwind (fortunately it was around a mark and looked pretty cool). The first time I jibed in wind with the new blades I almost threw the crew off the boat - we had never felt the boat carve a turn like that before. | | |
|
0 registered members (),
557
guests, and 51
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,062 Members8,150 | Most Online4,027 Jul 30th, 2025 | | |