I have a VERY hard time taking anything from the IPCC as being impartial science. It was formed with the SOLE intent of PROVING global warming caused by CO2.

It's like going to the Chevy dealer and asking if you should buy a Silverado or a Tundra.... what do you think they're going to say?

Same goes with the people on that panel. Given their history and how they were formed, now if there is not a "problem", there is no reason for them to exist. i.e. no jobs, no money. What interest would they even have in reporting if they had proof that GW was not being caused by man?