Yeah, i know... dead horse. "Test" part two... and like most sequels, never as good as the first. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

I guess that's really my personal gripe. Let's have a real discussion. Don't just tell me (and the rest of the population), "Science has decided." Really? I didn't know it was being talked about and suddenly as quick as the debate has begun, it's over?

A huge problem with the "science" behind the "models" is that they don't even take water vapor into consideration b/c "it's not influenced by human actions". Making the models incomplete and over stating the role of CO2.

Additionally the IPCC was formed with it's sole function to prove global warming and to help a political cause in Britain. (During the coal miners strike of the 70's to give the government another "Pro" towards Nuke plants). Not to mention all of the breeches in science/research ethics. Think about the whole economy surrounding this issue. People are making a LOT of money on it. They HAVE to justify their jobs.

I'm not interested in some emotional argument anymore. Just science and facts. Most people argue and believe the way they do b/c so and so said so. I know most people are not engineers/scientifically minded, but at least educate yourself a little and make the decision that way. Don't be a sheep lead to the slaughter.

Watch "an inconvenient truth" watch "the great global warming swindle" and then decide. Both movies are done to persuade you towards their thinking, but... if you watch them both... and then decide, you made up your own mind. I have watched them both. Their was not much data in Al's movie and I felt as if he was very condescending. I had done my research prior to watching the GW swindle movie and it only solidified my feelings. Sadly though, much of the anti-GW information out there has as much propaganda in it as does the pro-GW stuff. Only problem is that the anti material gets a bad wrap b/c of it. Read the numbers do some study, decide for yourself.