The lead scientist involved with monitoring project was quoted as saying: "The warming that's going on in the (Antarctic) peninsula is pretty clearly tied to greenhouse gas increases and the change that they have in the atmospheric circulation around the Antarctic".
Evidence such as this linking climate change and its associated impact to atmospheric greenhouse gas increases is continually mounting. As an engineer/scientist I have the utmost confidence in the methodology used to establish these links.
Scientists like Bell, Eienstein, Newton spent years in developing proof ( not their hypothesis ) of their theorys and ideas, which won them fame and continued admiration. In contrast to the above quoted scientist that it is " pretty clearly tied " with no cooberating evidence then it gets quoted by you Phile as definative evidence for us lesser mortals to accept as proof.
regards