Now, if you have any reasonable understanding of the “scientific method”, you know it is impossible to prove or disprove the theory of man-made global warming, to the rigorous requirements applied to most scientific experimentation.
Back to the original post on this thread:
If it is impossible to prove or disprove the theory of manmade global warming, why are you asking what "evidence" would convince skeptics?
Also, it bothers me that the word "impossible" would be in a scientist's vocabulary. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" />
