Ahhh, but that is only the way how one presents his or her intentions


We're not threatening anything, just evaluating the benefits of organising ourselves.

We're are not being ungrateful, oh no, we are just extending on their excellent support through other channels. Afterall, it is not fair to them that they have to carry the whole weight by themselves.

We are not being nasty or rude. To the contrary, in official documentation we are most definately requesting them politely to re-evaluated their stance for any unintentional oversights with respect to the IOC stated prefered policy.

A split ? Certainly not, we are quite happy here in our most succesful MHC committee. So much in fact that we need a larger support structure to lessen the burden on these committee members. We think it unfair to put the burnden of this larger organisation upon (insert name of local MNA) so we organise it ourselves. All towards maximizing the effectiveness of the MHC (= working from within), certainly you (insert name of local MNA) support this wholely ? (if opponent says no then he will have caused the split, so he won't say no, which in turn means he has just accepted the additional organisation even if he didn't want to do that.)

That is how you play power and influence games. And I dislike those games with a passion, even when I know how to do it.

Wouter