Originally Posted by Pirate
...yep that's 3mm of filler in there
remember this fact, I'll get back to it later wink


later.....

That gap started me thinking...... right back to the first page of this thread and the crack in the hull that started all this

confused

If..... and I'm just thinking out-loud here, if the rear beam was placed first and had a small amount of tightening done and then the front beam went in with again a small amount of tightening done..... the hulls then squared as we all do....

Now if it were me, I'd then tighten down the rear beam a tad more..... simply because its the easier one to do compared to the front beam, and I'd probably go a little more on the rear beam too if the truth be known before breaking my arm in a dozen spots to tighten the front beam

In Karps case and with that much difference in the beam slots that would have left around a +5mm gap under the front beam on the inside bolt hole

as the bolt is tightened up its pulling against the hull

The hull is resisting but is under a large amount of tension
The more I think about it, the boat rigged and sailing would have been far less stressfull on that part of the hull
add in a badly designed trailer that works at the hulls like cracking a whip

& I guess it was just a matter of when not if


thoughts ??

cool


Yar, & this ere post be done without a sin'le drop o' rum passin' me lips

Kingy
started with Impara Cadet #3 / Mosquito #245
& now Mosquitos #1182 & #1740