Wait, now we're looking at data and saying that the PN numbers are actually pretty good? What are we ever going to do with all of these torches and pitchforks?
Mike
Mike how did you even remotely put together that I'm ok with DPN? I'm saying exacly the opposite and Jakes data shows there is significant differences between SCHRS and DPN so I'm even more motivated to either dump DPN outright or adjust it based on the numbers used in europe. But thanks for taking the issue seriously.
Obviously, you're not happy. I was actually referring to Jake's post.
I was trying to add some levity. It's pretty obvious that I've been taking this seriously throughout the thread.
Kaos: We (MHC) don't get to "tell" the PN committee what to do, we can only advise/recommend.
We CAN push for a different system, just as soon as someone presents a real proposal (no Mark, none of your countless posts here equal a solid proposal worthy of presenting to the board).
Mike
