Do you know how to read in English?
"But I have never ever published actual WC third party text as you have just did."
That means quoted mail text by a third party, a person not being me.
You can´t understand reality and rules, and you want to comprehend this?
extract: 13 décembre published on you blog, one beyond many exemple of internal WC debate, so third party:
"After Nov 26 Paris meeting (decisions were known beforehand) some irregular procedures being officially questioned right now by another WC member"
You want to make believe that the debate in the WC does not involved third party.
Are you serious ?
For sure you did not published the text, only the spirit of it....
This way you can twist the facts, forgetting to write that you were involved, and forgetting to published the response that exists.
Very fair and honnest indeed.
You revealed yourself there.
So please, no more moral/ethical lesson.
