Originally Posted by rexdenton
No. Actually, it was written with the Infusion and Cap in mind...re-read it, and remember that the 'angle of attachment to the beams' is canted 4 degrees on the Infusion. I own one...and, uhhh, had to make a minor repair of sorts that made me very familiar with the design specs...Long story thats all figured out now!
Provide a definition for the "angle of attachment to the beams" because it is not clear to me what that is. Are you suggesting that the attachment (beam landings?) is something separate from the rest of the hull?

Here is the AC72 rule that I like:
Quote

Each hull shall be designed to be symmetrical and shall be symmetrical, within +/- 0.005
m, about its hull centerplane except hull surface that is:
(a) between transverse planes 1.000 m forward and 13.000 m forward of the stern plane that is also 0.400 m or more above MWP as shown in Appendix C;
(b) within 0.250 m radius from the axis of rotation of the rudder and
(c) an area on the surface of the hull not exceeding 1.000 m longitudinally by 0.400 m transverse girth within which a daggerboard opening is wholly contained and
(d) for local reinforcement necessary for fittings.